Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Sure... But my question was more why are the permission not ok in the
tar file?
Because I messed up ;)
They probably should have svn:executable set on them at some point.
Right.
Regards,
Mladen.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I'm adding my +1 for stable below after some personal testing. If you
want to vote, do so now, as this vote will close in a few hours.
Thanks,
Yoav
Apache Tomcat v5.5.16 is:
[ X ] Stable (no major issues)
[ ] Beta (at least one major issue: please provide details)
[ ] Alpha (multiple
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19864.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: pero
Date: Wed Mar 15 09:20:34 2006
New Revision: 386118
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386118view=rev
Log:
Fix that ReplicationValve set primary flag as no backup exists!
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Wed Mar 15 09:29:02 2006
New Revision: 386120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386120view=rev
Log:
- As suggested by Peter, move getWorkerThread inside the try (an OOM could
occur). This isn't going
to help the server much, though.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks, :-)
Peter
Am 15.03.2006 um 18:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: remm
Date: Wed Mar 15 09:29:02 2006
New Revision: 386120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386120view=rev
Log:
- As suggested by Peter, move getWorkerThread inside the try (an
OOM could occur). This isn't going
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
OK, with that this vote is now closed. I'll send out announcements to
the mailing lists and update the web site to reflect the result.
Yoav
On 3/15/06, Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache Tomcat v5.5.16 is:
[X ] Stable (no major issues)
[ ] Beta (at least one major issue:
Author: yoavs
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:12:11 2006
New Revision: 386136
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386136view=rev
Log:
5.5.16 is now stable.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-55.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-55.xml
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:16:58 2006
New Revision: 386140
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386140view=rev
Log:
Refactored member to be memberimpl, as it is not specific to multicast
Added:
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:17:58 2006
New Revision: 386141
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386141view=rev
Log:
Updated todo list and demo code
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/demos/ChannelCreator.java
The Apache Tomcat Team has voted to certify v5.5.16 as stable.
Binding +1 votes were cast by Mladen Turk, Peter Rossbach, Remy
Maucherat, Henri Gomez, Jeanfrancois Arcand, and myself.
The web site will be updated shortly to reflect the result of this
vote. You can also inspect the:
Release
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 15 11:32:57 2006
New Revision: 386148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386148view=rev
Log:
Refactored so that sender state is handled on a per member basis, and is not
per socket.
as suspicion is handled correctly even in a multi threaded environment
Modified:
Hey Filip,
I thing you must also sync the first get statement :-)
public static SenderState getSenderState(Member member) {
+SenderState state = (SenderState)memberStates.get(member);
+if ( state == null ) {
+synchronized ( memberStates ) {
+state =
I should have checked this before the vote for 5.5.16 was closed, but I
just realized that in 5.5.16 the native connector is still at 1.1.1.
Does the Tomcat native connector have it's own release cycle? How does
that work since it is bundled in the Tomcat release? Thanks.
,
Josh.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38988.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 15 13:57:32 2006
New Revision: 386177
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386177view=rev
Log:
Fixed sender state
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/GroupChannel.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37498.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38795.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Mar 15 22:43:16 2006
New Revision: 386275
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386275view=rev
Log:
Use native 1.1.2
Modified:
tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.properties.default
URL:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
The Apache Tomcat Team has voted to certify v5.5.16 as stable.
Binding +1 votes were cast by Mladen Turk, Peter Rossbach, Remy
Maucherat, Henri Gomez, Jeanfrancois Arcand, and myself.
Just figured out that the 5.5.16 was shipped with tomcat-native-1.1.1,
and it should be
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Mar 15 23:07:46 2006
New Revision: 386277
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386277view=rev
Log:
Fix pessimistic locking mode by removing redundant shm lock code.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Mar 15 23:15:58 2006
New Revision: 386278
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386278view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 38984. Patch provided by Peter Grimshaw.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/OS.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
44 matches
Mail list logo
