DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39759.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: billbarker
Date: Wed Jun 7 22:06:37 2006
New Revision: 412661
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412661view=rev
Log:
Add missing method to stop Gump from nagging
Sorry, I did forget one file.
Rémy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39663.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 06:58:04 2006
New Revision: 412754
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412754view=rev
Log:
Added constructor that creates a membership that includes the local member
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38768.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Thu Jun 8 07:50:07 2006
New Revision: 412764
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412764view=rev
Log:
- Create clustered managers with the Catalina CL set as the context CL (as
classloading may occur).
- Should fix 39699.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Thu Jun 8 08:00:12 2006
New Revision: 412766
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412766view=rev
Log:
- While it wouldn't be a completely bad idea to switch to an executor, the
black box behavior of an
executor makes it a bit bad to be used with a default lame
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: yoavs
Date: Thu Jun 8 08:01:21 2006
New Revision: 412767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412767view=rev
Log:
Support our friends at ApacheCon EU for a couple of weeks.
(I'll remove the logo/link and re-generate the site once the conference ends).
Modified:
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/MultipartStream.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/MultipartStream.java?rev=412780view=auto
Hi,
To avoid any possible conflicts, I see no choice but to package rename
the JDT subset that is used by Jasper.
Any other ideas ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Could you summarise what conflicts and why do we have to use JDT ?
My understanding was that the main reason is that it's better / faster /
less leaky than
javac - is this correct ? Is it still true for JDK1.5 ? Could we just use
javac as default - and
in case of 'conflicts' ?
Package rename
Costin Manolache wrote:
Could you summarise what conflicts and why do we have to use JDT ?
As usual: version conflicts with people who would use JDT in their webapps.
My understanding was that the main reason is that it's better / faster /
less leaky than
javac - is this correct ? Is it
Hi,
My understanding was that the main reason is that it's better / faster /
less leaky than
javac - is this correct ? Is it still true for JDK1.5 ? Could we just use
javac as default - and
in case of 'conflicts' ?
There's also another reason: if we use JDT then we don't require users
to
I got it, so we have to use jdt.
What about using a separate classloader to load JDT ( child or sibling of
server classloader for example ),
so any jdt in webapps won't be visible ?
Well - if you are comfortable maintaining JDT changes, I don't have a
problem, it just doesn't feel
right. For
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39402.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 09:57:24 2006
New Revision: 412798
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412798view=rev
Log:
Fixed defect 39699
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 10:01:41 2006
New Revision: 412800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412800view=rev
Log:
Fixed defect 39699
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 10:36:19 2006
New Revision: 412808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412808view=rev
Log:
More updates, far from complete
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/doc/leader-election-initiate-election.dia
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 15:36:22 2006
New Revision: 412871
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412871view=rev
Log:
Almost there, debugging the code and the algorithm left
Added:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 15:37:42 2006
New Revision: 412874
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412874view=rev
Log:
One more fix
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/NioReplicationThread.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38768.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 8 18:52:52 2006
New Revision: 412903
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412903view=rev
Log:
played around with the test
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/TcpFailureDetector.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
40 matches
Mail list logo