Hello,
I never doubted that Tomcat 5.5 supported JSPs using Java5.0's new
syntax and features, until I read the following in the docs:
The Java compiler from Eclipse JDT in included as the default compiler.
[...] This new compiler will be updated to support the Java 5 syntax as
soon as possible.
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Oct 25 03:18:02 2006
New Revision: 467599
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467599
Log:
Allow variable size of AJP message via packetSize=n in Connector/.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java
Hi,
Beyond the fact that org.apache.jk.* provides a generator for
the mod_jk.conf, is there any reason to have that connector
in parallel with org.apache.coyote.ajp.*
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
This question belongs to the tomcat user list, please direct your future
questions there,
The answer to your question is is conf/web.xml where you can set the
language features for the JSP, just search for 1.4 and change it to 1.5
Filip
Dies Koper wrote:
Hello,
I never doubted that Tomcat
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 25 07:31:25 2006
New Revision: 467669
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467669
Log:
Code clean up, last pieces to make is a the KeyAttachment object and the
Runnable used for addEvent to be non GC objects, as these events happen very
frequently
I don't have any preference either way, since we are pretty few active
folks at the moment, the less code is usually better
Filip
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Beyond the fact that org.apache.jk.* provides a generator for
the mod_jk.conf, is there any reason to have that connector
in parallel with
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 25 15:11:10 2006
New Revision: 467787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467787
Log:
Documented socket properties
Added in the ability to cache bytebuffers based on number of channels or number
of bytes
Added in nonGC poller events to lower CPU usage
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37239.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37271.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40817.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40817.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37277.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
12 matches
Mail list logo