are JSPs using Java5.0 syntax supported completely?

2006-10-25 Thread Dies Koper
Hello, I never doubted that Tomcat 5.5 supported JSPs using Java5.0's new syntax and features, until I read the following in the docs: The Java compiler from Eclipse JDT in included as the default compiler. [...] This new compiler will be updated to support the Java 5 syntax as soon as possible.

svn commit: r467599 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk: common/ChannelSocket.java common/JkInputStream.java core/JkHandler.java core/MsgContext.java

2006-10-25 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Wed Oct 25 03:18:02 2006 New Revision: 467599 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467599 Log: Allow variable size of AJP message via packetSize=n in Connector/. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java

[TC6] Double AJP connector implementation

2006-10-25 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Beyond the fact that org.apache.jk.* provides a generator for the mod_jk.conf, is there any reason to have that connector in parallel with org.apache.coyote.ajp.* Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: are JSPs using Java5.0 syntax supported completely?

2006-10-25 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
This question belongs to the tomcat user list, please direct your future questions there, The answer to your question is is conf/web.xml where you can set the language features for the JSP, just search for 1.4 and change it to 1.5 Filip Dies Koper wrote: Hello, I never doubted that Tomcat

svn commit: r467669 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: coyote/http11/InternalNioInputBuffer.java tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java

2006-10-25 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 25 07:31:25 2006 New Revision: 467669 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467669 Log: Code clean up, last pieces to make is a the KeyAttachment object and the Runnable used for addEvent to be non GC objects, as these events happen very frequently

Re: [TC6] Double AJP connector implementation

2006-10-25 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I don't have any preference either way, since we are pretty few active folks at the moment, the less code is usually better Filip Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Beyond the fact that org.apache.jk.* provides a generator for the mod_jk.conf, is there any reason to have that connector in parallel with

svn commit: r467787 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net: NioChannel.java NioEndpoint.java SecureNioChannel.java SocketProperties.java

2006-10-25 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 25 15:11:10 2006 New Revision: 467787 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467787 Log: Documented socket properties Added in the ability to cache bytebuffers based on number of channels or number of bytes Added in nonGC poller events to lower CPU usage

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37239] - HTTP requests that map to filter mapping but not to filesystem path are unnecessarily redirected by Tomcat

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37239. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37271] - Deployer.install()/JMX bug results in HTTP 302 redirect responses

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37271. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40817] New: - servlet-cgi throws index out of bounds exception on certain cgi

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40817. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40817] - servlet-cgi throws index out of bounds exception on certain cgi

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40817. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37277] - long delay in Tomcat startup

2006-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37277. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.