Re: tomcat native documentation

2008-02-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Costin Manolache wrote: Yes, JVM is not so good because it changes, I agree /usr/local/lib ( and the JVM dir ) are only good for people with root access. What about having 2 options: - 'system' installation - /usr/local/lib - 'local' - TOMCAT_HOME/lib/native ( or TOMCAT_HOME/lib/`arch` if same

svn commit: r627689 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/ManagerBase.java

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 01:55:23 2008 New Revision: 627689 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627689view=rev Log: fix NPE java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.catalina.session.ManagerBase.processExpires(ManagerBase.java:682) at

svn commit: r627693 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 02:01:48 2008 New Revision: 627693 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627693view=rev Log: new proposal and vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r627695 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 02:04:18 2008 New Revision: 627695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627695view=rev Log: I'm an idiot, put on my head backwards this morning :) Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44405] - regression with tomcat 6.0.16, NullPointerException on getServletContext().getResourceAsStream()

2008-02-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44405. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43925] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.BodyContentImpl causing huge memory allocations

2008-02-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r627743 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContext.java java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/ServerCookie.java webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 05:59:00 2008 New Revision: 627743 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627743view=rev Log: Add STRICT compliance flag to impact cookie value handling to provide backwards compatibility Add STRICT complanice flag to impact ServletContext.getResource(AsStream) to

svn commit: r627744 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 06:01:15 2008 New Revision: 627744 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627744view=rev Log: regression proposals Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r627745 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS.txt java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputBuffer.java

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 06:03:10 2008 New Revision: 627745 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627745view=rev Log: implement fix Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputBuffer.java Modified:

svn commit: r627747 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS.txt java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/DeltaManager.java java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/DeltaRequest.java java/org/apache/catalina/ha/sessi

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 06:04:10 2008 New Revision: 627747 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627747view=rev Log: Fix dead lock during round robin non sticky lb Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/session/DeltaManager.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30624] - unable to load tiles-definition.war when running embedded tomcat

2008-02-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30624. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r627751 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 06:09:52 2008 New Revision: 627751 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627751view=rev Log: changelog for last two commits Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL:

embedded tomcat 6

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Webb
I have written a program that embeds tomcat 6.0.14 into it. The problem is that once I call Embedded.start(), the program does not keep running and just terminates normally. I have placed the program in the eclipse debugger and all looks fine, but the program just exits. What can I do to ensure

embedded tomcat 6

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Webb
I have written a program that embeds tomcat 6.0.14 into it. The problem is that once I call Embedded.start(), the program does not keep running and just terminates normally. I have placed the program in the eclipse debugger and all looks fine, but the program just exits. What can I do to ensure

Re: embedded tomcat 6

2008-02-14 Thread Johnny Kewl
--- HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm The most powerful application server on earth. The only real POJO Application Server. Making the Java dream come true.

Re: embedded tomcat 6

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Webb
Thanks for the information. Looking at the code, it does not look like the setAwait(boolean) does anything. I ended up writing a test GUI tool that will start/stop my embedded Tomcat. From what I can tell, the embedded tomcat API relies on the calling thread(s) to keep things going b/c with the

svn commit: r627884 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 14 14:05:32 2008 New Revision: 627884 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627884view=rev Log: Propose fix Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r627883 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CoyoteAdapter.java

2008-02-14 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 14 14:02:41 2008 New Revision: 627883 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627883view=rev Log: Fix ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException reported on users list. Patch provided by Charles R Caldarale. Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44423] - invalid duplicate listeners warning

2008-02-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44423. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r627887 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 14 14:12:38 2008 New Revision: 627887 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627887view=rev Log: Vote Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r627886 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 14 14:12:05 2008 New Revision: 627886 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627886view=rev Log: votes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

[Proposal] Remove status page from the docs

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Thomas
All, Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib - lib etc) I cam across this page. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/status.html It is horribly out of date and duplicates information that is elsewhere.

Re: [Proposal] Remove status page from the docs

2008-02-14 Thread Yoav Shapira
+1. On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib - lib etc) I cam across this page.

svn commit: r627911 - in /tomcat/trunk: NOTES-FOR-TOMCAT-6.2.txt NOTES-FOR-TOMCAT-7.txt

2008-02-14 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Feb 14 15:54:39 2008 New Revision: 627911 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627911view=rev Log: Add a file to track possible 6.2 features so I can refer to it from the wiki. Added: tomcat/trunk/NOTES-FOR-TOMCAT-6.2.txt (with props) Modified:

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of TomcatVersions by markt

2008-02-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Tomcat Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by markt: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions -- * markt:

[PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Thomas
All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on the users list but I think it is time to draw a line under 3.x.

[PROPOSAL / POLL] Issue a de-support notice for Tomcat 4

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Thomas
All, Tomcat 4 has been in maintenance mode for some time now with nearly all changes either updating libraries or fixing security bugs. I am happy to continue acting as release manager for as long as there are three +1s when there is a release. However, there will come a time when it makes

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 Filip Mark Thomas wrote: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on the users list but I think it is

Re: svn commit: r627911 - in /tomcat/trunk: NOTES-FOR-TOMCAT-6.2.txt NOTES-FOR-TOMCAT-7.txt

2008-02-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1. AnnotationProcessor - InstanceManager replacement (used by Geronimo) this is already in trunk, is that what you meant? Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [PROPOSAL / POLL] Issue a de-support notice for Tomcat 4

2008-02-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
yes, a the timeframe of 16 months heads up sounds like a good plan. still many instances of 4 running, another way to look at it, is to have no more than 3 versions active at any point, so when TC 7 comes out, TC 4 goes to bed. I think it's too hard for us to try to maintain more releases than

svn commit: r627921 - /tomcat/trunk/PROPOSALS.txt

2008-02-14 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Feb 14 16:36:29 2008 New Revision: 627921 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627921view=rev Log: one more feature Modified: tomcat/trunk/PROPOSALS.txt Modified: tomcat/trunk/PROPOSALS.txt URL:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding a note that 3.x is no longer supported / removing much of the 3.x info from: /index.html /security-3.html /whichversion.html /bugreport.html Thoughts? +1. Yoav

Re: [Proposal] Remove status page from the docs

2008-02-14 Thread Rainer Jung
+1 Mark Thomas schrieb: All, Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib - lib etc) I cam across this page. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/status.html It is horribly out of date and duplicates

Re: [PROPOSAL / POLL] Issue a de-support notice for Tomcat 4

2008-02-14 Thread Rainer Jung
I agree with both of you. Forgive me that I didn't check myself: I run into a 4.0.x release every now and then, especially bundled with some apps. Has 4.0 ever been put into end of live? I think EOL for 4.0 should be announced like for 3.x if this didn't happen anytime in the past. Regards,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Rainer Jung
+1 We could include the info about no release for almost 4 years in the official message, so that users understand that this is not a message of bad support in general. Regards, Rainer Mark Thomas schrieb: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Bill Barker
Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 4 years ago the last version, about 8 years ago the first (or 3.0) release... I wish we also had a '6.x-minimal' release for people wanting something very small ( and not using jetty ). Costin On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, The last 3.x release

Re: [PROPOSAL / POLL] Issue a de-support notice for Tomcat 4

2008-02-14 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 Are you going to make any difference between 4.0.x and 4.1.x ? I think we should drop 4.0.x sooner. Costin On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Tomcat 4 has been in maintenance mode for some time now with nearly all changes either updating libraries

Re: [Proposal] Remove status page from the docs

2008-02-14 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mark Thomas wrote: All, Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib - lib etc) I cam across this page. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/status.html It is horribly out of date and duplicates information