Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread jean-frederic clere
Deepak Mishra wrote: hello. pardon me as a newbie if these comments seem to be awkward... i searched the archives, but failed to find any such thing with reference to tomcat6. what i have read till now, i feel WARP to be more faster and efficient than AJP (maybe the book authors were biased

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Deepak Mishra
mod_webapp is not supported since years that is why. Cheers Jean-Frederic this is what i want to ask...WHY is mod_webapp not being worked upon,when WARP sounds better than AJP ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.18

2008-07-24 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.18/ According to the release process, the 6.0.18 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable Yoav

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Henri Gomez
a long long story :-) 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mod_webapp is not supported since years that is why. Cheers Jean-Frederic this is what i want to ask...WHY is mod_webapp not being worked upon,when WARP sounds better than AJP ?

Re: [VOTE] bayeux inclusion

2008-07-24 Thread Henri Gomez
[X] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Deepak Mishra
sir please !!! i am fond of listening looong stories...if you feel tired, perhaps you can provide me a link, would you?? please...please.. On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:22:33 +0530, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a long long story :-) 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mod_webapp

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Henri Gomez
So grab the tomcat-dev archives. To be short warp is a good protocol but ajp was more widely used. 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sir please !!! i am fond of listening looong stories...if you feel tired, perhaps you can provide me a link, would you?? please...please.. On Thu, 24

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 06:34:02 PST --- I think this is a design flaw of the Adobe client. There are plenty of servlets, so adding this to the default servlet is pointless, as it might not be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #5 from Mike Bremford [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 07:08:05 PST --- The Adobe client will request the entire document, but if it finds it's Linearized and the server accepts Ranges it will interrupt that initial request.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #6 from Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 07:50:18 PST --- I'm guessing the Apache web server supports this just fine. If so, then that's both a workaround and a reason to improve Tomcat. Tomcat should strive to be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45442] Thread.currentThread.getClassLoader() wrong when looking up Resources

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45442 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 06:17:29 PST --- I don't see why it would be mandatory to set the context CL simply to lookup static resources. This is done only for resolution through a URL (like

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Costin Manolache
I'm curious - why do you think warp sounds 'better', or 'faster and more efficient' than AJP ? I don't remember any benchmark or major difference. And I think that was the main reason it was abandoned - it was just different, without 'better'. In fact there were even talks to abandon AJP - since

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #7 from Mike Bremford [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 08:13:35 PST --- Yes, the Apache web server sets this header. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Henri Gomez
apart from the topic, can you/anyone tell me the prerequisites for making a connector of my own...i mean what things should i be knowing ?? i dont think i have sufficient knowledge to do this thing at present...but atleast i can start making a knowledge-base to do so.. thanks a lot. You

Re: WARP development

2008-07-24 Thread Deepak Mishra
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:26:57 +0530, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So grab the tomcat-dev archives. To be short warp is a good protocol but ajp was more widely used. i have done some googling, but couldnt find anything specific. how do i search in the archives here ?? apart from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504 Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44382] Need to add support for HTTPOnly session cookie parameter

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #9 from Jim Manico [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 18:47:23 PST --- Thank you for your support to see my HttpOnly session id patch get pushed into a future release of Tomcat. Several of the committers tell me that this patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

2008-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39309 Madhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --