Re: JSSE-based crypto performance

2016-09-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
Rémy, > On Sep 30, 2016, at 09:50, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > 2016-09-30 15:26 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere : > >>> On 09/29/2016 08:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> In the past few years, jfclere has been dong some performance testing

Re: svn commit: r1762955 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ build.xml java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java

2016-09-30 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2016-09-30 22:38 GMT+03:00 : > Author: markt > Date: Fri Sep 30 19:38:36 2016 > New Revision: 1762955 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762955=rev > Log: > Remove unused class now JNDI is no longer used for resource access 1. This class is still mentioned here, in

svn commit: r1762955 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ build.xml java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:38:36 2016 New Revision: 1762955 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762955=rev Log: Remove unused class now JNDI is no longer used for resource access Removed: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java Modified:

svn commit: r1762954 - in /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk: ./ build.xml java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:38:06 2016 New Revision: 1762954 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762954=rev Log: Remove unused class now JNDI is no longer used for resource access Removed: tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java Modified:

svn commit: r1762953 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.xml java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:37:41 2016 New Revision: 1762953 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762953=rev Log: Remove unused class now JNDI is not longer used for resource access Removed: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/naming/JndiPermission.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml

svn commit: r1762949 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeContext.java java/org/apache/tomcat/util/scan/UrlJar.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:33:33 2016 New Revision: 1762949 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762949=rev Log: Remove references to now unused jndi: URLs Modified: tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)

svn commit: r1762948 - in /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeContext.java java/org/apache/tomcat/util/scan/UrlJar.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:33:01 2016 New Revision: 1762948 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762948=rev Log: Remove references to now unused jndi: URLs Modified: tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)

svn commit: r1762947 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache: jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeContext.java tomcat/util/scan/UrlJar.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:32:32 2016 New Revision: 1762947 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762947=rev Log: Remove references to now unused jndi: URLs Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeContext.java

svn commit: r1762946 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/catalina/webresources/WarURLConnection.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:28:31 2016 New Revision: 1762946 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762946=rev Log: Investigating https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60087 If Tomcat is going to start using 'jar:war:file:' URLs as the code source for classes, ensure that the

svn commit: r1762945 - in /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/catalina/webresources/WarURLConnection.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:28:08 2016 New Revision: 1762945 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762945=rev Log: Investigating https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60087 If Tomcat is going to start using 'jar:war:file:' URLs as the code source for classes, ensure that the

svn commit: r1762944 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/webresources/WarURLConnection.java

2016-09-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Sep 30 19:27:37 2016 New Revision: 1762944 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762944=rev Log: Investigating https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60087 If Tomcat is going to start using 'jar:war:file:' URLs as the code source for classes, ensure that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.10

2016-09-30 Thread Violeta Georgieva
Hi, 2016-09-26 19:17 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > > Version 1.2.10 includes the following change: > > - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2j > - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2j > > The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1], > and the build was

Re: JSSE-based crypto performance

2016-09-30 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2016-09-30 15:26 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere : > On 09/29/2016 08:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > All, > > > > In the past few years, jfclere has been dong some performance testing > > with JSSE-based crypto versus OpenSSL-based crypto, and it had always > > been clear

Re: JSSE-based crypto performance

2016-09-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 09/29/2016 08:35 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > In the past few years, jfclere has been dong some performance testing > with JSSE-based crypto versus OpenSSL-based crypto, and it had always > been clear that the pure-Java crypto was slower by orders of magnitude. Correct, it is

[Bug 60087] Bouncy Castle in WEB-INF/lib not working on Tomcat 8 when unpackWars=false

2016-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60087 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas --- Unfortunately, it doesn't appear to be as clear cut as I would like. If we look at how the JRE constructs a code path for a JAR, it returns a "file:" URL to the JAR, not a "jar:" URL.

svn commit: r16040 - /release/tomcat/tomcat-6/KEYS

2016-09-30 Thread violetagg
Author: violetagg Date: Fri Sep 30 11:37:26 2016 New Revision: 16040 Log: Adding code signing key. Modified: release/tomcat/tomcat-6/KEYS Modified: release/tomcat/tomcat-6/KEYS == --- release/tomcat/tomcat-6/KEYS

Re: Time for 6.0.x?

2016-09-30 Thread Violeta Georgieva
2016-09-30 10:23 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > > On 29/09/2016 15:38, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2016-09-29 17:02 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > >> > >> On 20/09/2016 20:07, Mark Thomas wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> It has been a while since 6.0.x and the

svn commit: r1762883 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: ./ KEYS

2016-09-30 Thread violetagg
Author: violetagg Date: Fri Sep 30 11:19:14 2016 New Revision: 1762883 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762883=rev Log: Adding code signing key. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ (props changed) tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/KEYS Propchange: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.10

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 26/09/2016 17:17, Mark Thomas wrote: > Version 1.2.10 includes the following change: > > - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2j > - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2j > > The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1], > and the build was done using tag [2]. > >

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.42

2016-09-30 Thread Keiichi Fujino
2016-09-27 23:23 GMT+09:00 Mark Thomas : > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_42/ > > Source: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/ > > This is a maintenance release with a handful of bug fixes. It also > includes Windows

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.42

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/09/2016 15:23, Mark Thomas wrote: > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_42/ > > Source: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/ > > This is a maintenance release with a handful of bug fixes. It also > includes Windows binaries for IIS. >

[GitHub] tomcat pull request #:

2016-09-30 Thread vmassol
Github user vmassol commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/eb195bebac8239b994fa921aeedb136a93e4ccaf#commitcomment-19237685 In java/org/apache/catalina/Context.java: In java/org/apache/catalina/Context.java on line 1790: Hi Mark, Thanks

Re: Time for 6.0.x?

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 29/09/2016 15:38, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-09-29 17:02 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : >> >> On 20/09/2016 20:07, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> It has been a while since 6.0.x and the changelog is looking a tad long. >>> Any takers for RM'ing a release? >> >>

Changes to code signing API

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Thomas
All, Symantec have sent out notification that they are tightening up the code signing API [1]. The good news for us is that we already send everything, including credentials, as part of the POST body so this should be a NO-OP for us. Mark [1]