with ASF rules ;)
On Jan 14, 2008 6:57 PM, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the difference is based on an understanding of what
constitutes a release. A tarball in www.apache.org/dist/... is a
release by definition. Files cannot go in that directory or its
children without
On Jan 4, 2008 1:34 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date
for our next release and work towards that
+1.
There are a stack of changes (both committed and proposed) for 5.5.x as
well.
http://www.apache.org/dev/, especially the How the ASF works and
Introduction for contributors pieces.
In a nutshell:
1. Join this mailing list, post ideas / comments / whatever.
2. Put your contributions (code, docs, whatever) into Bugzilla at
issues.apache.org, and committers will get them into
If it's a reproducible problem on a normal Windows operating system
(as opposed to some strange custom version on your PC), please submit
the script diff as a patch to Bugzilla (issues.apache.org) ;) Thanks,
Yoav
On Dec 21, 2007 6:35 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any comments?
On Dec 7, 2007 9:36 AM, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last step is to archive or delete the existing faq pages ..
site/trunk/xdocs-faq
site/trunk/docs/faq (except for .htaccess)
I'm unsure which svn commands to run
svn delete
- or -
svn move TO_WHERE?
Not sure. Maybe tag with a
On Dec 5, 2007 8:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. We'll need explicit mappings since the old names and new pages
aren't the same. Like this:
RewriteRule /faq/classnotfound.html
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Class_Not_Found [R=301]
Unless someone beats me - I'll try to do that this
On Dec 5, 2007 3:28 PM, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. Then if no one objects, I'll add this /faq/.htaccess (Should be
coming as txt attachement)
No objection from me. Thanks for taking care of this.
Yoav
-
To
Vitezslav,
On Dec 4, 2007 8:12 AM, Vitezslav Smid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-asf/issues/detail?id=23).
It has been ready for review for two days and until it is resolved I can't
work on other tasks.
Thank you for your help. I'm not sure
Hey,
On Dec 4, 2007 8:42 PM, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To chuck the FAQ from the site we can do this in one of a few ways
1) Delete the files and watch lots of 404's appear (yuck)
2) Change each faq with a META refresh (ok short term, crappy longer term)
3) Other??
Personally I'd
Sergey,
On Dec 1, 2007 8:24 AM, Sergey Vidyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've plan to write scripts that generate tomcat dependency for jars and
classes and submit it to you.
Can you explain how you would like to see it and who can help me with
details about that task?
This entire list
On Nov 29, 2007 12:33 PM, Vitezslav Smid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just claimed GHOP Issue #23 so I'm writing for more information.
How should the printer-friendly version look? Should it simply copy the
current layout?
I know CSS very well, but with XSLT I'm rather a beginner.
Tim, I
... at http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ
I think it looks pretty good. The question is, what's next: do we
(HTTP 301) redirect from tomcat.apache.org/FAQ to the wiki?
--
Thanks,
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
One of the tasks we put out for the Google Highly Open Participation
contest (http://code.google.com/opensource/ghop/2007-8/) is Tim's
idea, to move our FAQ from static files to the wiki.
A student, Gianluca Varisco, is taking on that task. He has just started work.
This is just an FYI for
On Nov 28, 2007 12:34 PM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why?
Think we can all discipline ourself.
Even if someone commits he must be aware that his commit
won't be on the wiki.
OK, fair enough ;)
Yoav
-
To
On Nov 28, 2007 3:16 PM, Gianluca Varisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to inform all of you that the first step of the migration has
been completed: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ
Thank you very much Gianluca! Great work so far. And I know it will
look even better when we start taking
On Nov 27, 2007 4:51 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently created some skeleton implementations of the above packages to
stop Eclipse complaining all the time about not being able to compile the
entire TC6 source tree.
Is there any interest in adding them to trunk to join the
Yo,
On Nov 13, 2007 5:07 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of Harmony stability... We have rather big list of
applications which are working with Harmony including Eclipse,
To be clear: I have no doubt of Harmony's quality and stability. I've
used it, it's great.
I want
Hey.
On Nov 13, 2007 6:22 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an effort to make my life easier (and that of anyone else working on
Windows) I'd like to change the STATUS files to STATUS.txt files since this
will allow me to use the default text editor for them. At the moment every
Hey,
On Nov 9, 2007 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to suggest you to create Tomcat out of the box bundle on top of
Harmony.
I've created such a bundle with the previous Harmony milestone release
[2]. It works but has areas for improvements... For example it's
Hey,
On Nov 5, 2007 9:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
My usual testing, which is to
Hey,
On Oct 29, 2007 9:46 PM, Lucas Galfaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
snip /
Just work on what you feel like doing. Scratch your itch. Have fun.
Don't wait. Send in good patches with accompanying test cases, if
applicable. Your help is welcome in any and all areas.
Any action
Hey,
On 10/22/07, Dave Rathnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way we can do the same thing with Tomcat? It's simple for us
to measure the number of byte in the payload of the HTTP
request/response, however that isn't enough. We need to know the total
number of bytes being sent and
Hey,
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
as-an-alternate category before doing any real work on it.
Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm
+0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and
Hey,
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
before which is hosting it.
I don't think that's a problem, and I don't think it has to be hosted
in the
Hey,
On 10/18/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat
5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is:
+1.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi DI,
On 10/17/07, DI Roman Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If misunderstood: Change line to
Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.5.x) from:
If error:
search for it?
It's an error: the build is intended to work with Java 1.5 and later,
including Java 1.6, but it
Hey,
On 9/26/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please advice what's needed to be done to get the ECCN numbers.
Read that page, please raise any questions that you have after you've
covered it. You'll be glad to know once these notices are sent, you'll
never need to check in
Hey,
On 9/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ X ] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
as well as the problems which started this whole
thing.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe,
Hey,
On 9/18/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another more precise draft.
snip /
than discussions about the validity of the disagreement). It would
introduce a small delay for committing certain patches and a minor
slowdown for development pace in theory, but in practice I've
Hey,
On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the
attributes of tags.
Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla?
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hey,
On 9/10/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
o CTR on trunk
o Various release branches are made (ala httpd, apr, etc...).
These include a STATUS file.
o All code applied to the release branch is under
lazy consensus but *must* be specified in
Hi,
On 9/6/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant.
I agree with that.
We had CTR policy till now and it was working.
It's still working. We've already voted to move the current trunk
into a special sandbox, with no loss of
Hey,
On 9/6/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the comments were that it was too annoying to do for casual
bugfixing, and it's true it's not justified for all patches. Maybe a
finer rule could be devised, something like using a RtisTC (tis = the
important stuff) model.
To
Hey,
On 9/4/07, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also propose that we take an handling of release branches
similar to httpd.
snip /
The votes will get in a file named STATUS file and once accepted in a
file named CHANGES.
The proposal of backports/fixes should be a
Hey,
On 9/3/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to file the board report by next week for a board
meeting on September 19th.
Here is my draft, so please fill in the gaps, since it's my
first one :)
Looks good to me ;)
Yoav
Hey,
On 8/31/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
calling for a second vote to move it to the sandbox, where Filip could
ballot
[ X ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
/ballot
Let's get done with this and move on ;)
Yoav
-
To
Hey,
On 9/2/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following on from my previous over eager attempt to clean up the
duplicate code in connectors I would like to propose the following
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/CHANGES
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/proxy
- move
Hey,
On 8/31/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hey,
On 8/24/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Release candidate can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.25/
Looks good to me after some cursory usage testing.
Yoav
-
To
Hey,
This thread is interesting stuff. I don't see myself using it, but
it's cool to see your level of effort and the results. Are you
actually using it for a production system? Is anyone else?
On 8/21/07, Johnny Kewl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted a pure fast binary HTTP based protocol,
Hey,
On 8/21/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beyond withdrawing the silly vote, asking for the code you veto to be
removed, and moving forward, don't you think you should hold a vote to
make trunk R-T-C first?
The latter is definitely a vote. (And I'd be -1 on it).
input
Hey,
On 8/20/07, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all. I'm
backing Remy's suggestion to send the current trunk to the sandbox:
[ ] +1 Let's end the revolution
[ X ] +0 What revolution?
+0 on this specific proposal.
-1 on
Hey,
On 8/13/07, Vivek Chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what the procedure for this is (File a bug?),
but I would like to request an addition to the books
list at http://tomcat.apache.org/resources.html.
I've added your book to the resources page. The change will show up
on the live
Hey,
On 8/9/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, you are right. We certainly can drop some of them. Maybe the
following list is better?
Catalina
Cluster
Connectors
Documentation
Jasper
Native:Integration
Native:JK
Hey,
On 8/10/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there enough interest to see a 5.5.25 release?
5.5.24 never happened as there we're not enough votes.
I think it's worth doing, for the security fixes alone.
Yoav
Hey,
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, you are right. We certainly can drop some of them. Maybe the
following list is better?
Catalina
Cluster
Connectors
Documentation
Jasper
Native:Integration
Native:JK
Native:Packaging
Servlet JSP API
Webapps:Examples
Hey,
On 7/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.14/
According to the release process, the 6.0.14 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
TCK?
Yoav
Hey,
On 7/31/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really curious on what approach you used to inline all your 3rd party
deps into org.apache.tomcat.util. Curious if you took them as is, or
trimmed them down to just what you need. Were any tools used to
help? Any disadvantages that
Hey,
On 7/31/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC we take a known version of a library and do a string replace on
package names, essentially. It's all done in Ant tasks: look for how
the Tomcat build handles Jakarta Commons DBCP for example. We don't
trim them down AFAIK, nor
Hey,
This is the wrong mailing list: please use the Tomcat users mailing
list. See instructions at http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html to
subscribe. Please post followup, if any, there.
On 7/31/07, CW (Chi Wo) Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any configuration setting in Tomcat that I
Hey,
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Tomcat 5 we had the following list of components:
Catalina
Catalina:Cluster
Catalina:Modules
Connector:AJP
Connector:Coyote
Connector:HTTP
Jasper
Native:Integration
Native:JK
Native:Packaging
Servlet JSP API
Servlets:CGI
Hey,
On 7/27/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JK 1.2.24 has been available for testing for some days as a svn
snapshot. Only very small bugs have been found and fixed. So I would
like to proceed with the release vote.
The bugs were fixed and 1.2.24 retagged with the same tag?
[ X ]
Hey,
On 7/24/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New binaries are available (in case nobody found them):
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.14/
Looks solid to me after some basic testing, including the examples webapp.
Yoav
Hey,
On 7/14/07, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think if Tomcat also supports PHP scripts, it could be wonderful!.
Google is your friend :) http://www.google.com/search?q=php+servlet.
I don't think that there is
Hey,
On 7/9/07, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The examples (servlet and JSP) have caused a list of security issues.
I think we should remove them from the Tomcat binary packages (6.0 and
5.x at least).
Any comments?
I'd like to leave them in, as they're amazingly useful,
heretofore appointed Yoav
Shapira to the office of Vice President, Apache Tomcat, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors is in receipt of the resignation
of Yoav Shapira from the office of Vice President, Apache Tomcat;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Yoav Shapira
On 7/3/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yo all,
I've started a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat in sandbox.
Cool, +1.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Apache Tomcat Board Report, June 2007
Summary
--
The project continues to be active on a number of fronts. There are
no issues requiring Board attention at this time.
Releases
-
We cut a number of releases incorporating all our active branches.
Tomcat 5.5.22 was out a
Also, this reminds me: is anyone interested in taking over the Apache
Tomcat PMC Chair role for next year?
Yoav
On 6/8/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Below is a first draft of our report to the Board for this month.
This report covers the time since the last one, about 3 months
Hey,
On 6/7/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yo,
I was gonna create a Bayeux implementation for Tomcat,
I am thinking it might be good for us to work with the Jetty and
Glassfish folks to use the same org.dojox interfaces.
I like the idea!
Question: Where should I do
Hi,
On 6/7/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fail-fast the connection using an IOException (the servlet would
effectively only handle clients which are fast enough if using the
Comet API like in Tomcat 6.0, which avoids a lot of issues)
This is an interesting assumption, but I think
Hi,.
On 5/30/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent change to ErrorReportValve is causing a problem with TCK.
From the commit log it seems that the change was not supposed to
introduce any new behavior:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=535915
But the valve's
... by June 18th at the latest, because the Board meeting is on June
20th. But since I'll be leaving the country on vacation the preceding
weekend, our deadline is a bit earlier, let's say June 15th.
This is just an early heads-up. Anyone have comments on what should
go in, besides the
Hey,
Use ServletContextListener's contextInitialized method. In it you can
do your Class.forName call or whatever other way you want to load the
class. This is portable and doesn't depend on Tomcat's internal
implementation.
Also, this is not a question for the dev mailing list, but for the
of presos around tomcat,
some from non committers as well if I remember correctly
Filip
- 2 mod_jk releases (1.2.22, 1.2.23), 1.2.23 was a security release
Yoav Shapira wrote:
... by June 18th at the latest, because the Board meeting is on June
20th. But since I'll be leaving the country
Hi,
On 5/30/07, Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing a quick scan, it looks like a good number of small fixes to 5.5.23
have accumulated over the last number of months. [See
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-devw=2r=1s=5.5.24q=b]
I know the Tomcat developers are largely focused on 6.0 now, but
George,
Did anyone get back to you about this?
I myself don't have much of a clue, as I haven't run Tomcat 5.5.x
Tomcat under a security manager.
Yoav
On 5/21/07, George Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Tomcat 5.5.23 under a security manager, and I'm hitting this
error on a call to
Marc,
On 5/22/07, Marc Lustig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are there any plans to implement the Deployment API in Tomcat?
I'm not aware of any concrete plans, nor have I seen much recent
discussion around the topic. That's not to say it won't or can't be
done, of course.
Yoav
Hi,
On 5/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible when new versions of Tomcat native be announced on list?
Seems Tomcat 6.0.13 requires 1.1.10. First I became aware of it, was
when user reported the problem. Granted I should have discovered it
before them when
Hi,
Yes, it could maybe be the cleanest, but too annoying to do IMO. I
would prefer the easy way you suggested and move current development
to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/ until there's a
release plan and it is moved to a /tcy.y.x/trunk/ with the appropriate
name.
I like
Hi,
On 5/18/07, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody? :-)
There's typically a time lag between the release announcement and the
appearance of the files in the Maven repositories. Want to contribute
scripts/time or otherwise help in making this faster?
Yoav
Hola,
On 5/18/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http(s)://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/branches/tc6.0.x ?
Or
http(s)://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/branches/annotationsAndComet
Yoav
-
To
Hi,
On 5/17/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea
to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it
acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ?
Like Filip and Mladen, I would prefer a new branch. It's pretty
Hi,
On 5/17/07, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we're calling the existing one 6.0.x,
wouldn't it be reasonable to call the new one 6.1.x?
6.1 or 6.5 ? Like 5.0 and 5.5 :)
Exactly my point -- the version number is not something we need to
decide now ;) The branch can be named for its
Hola,
On 5/8/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.13/
According to the release process, the 6.0.13 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Based on quick testing, no TCK etc.
Yoav
Hey,
On 5/4/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new (and most likely cursed) candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.13/
Casual testing (running a home-brewed app with some JMeter scripts)
looks good to me. Shall we have a stability
Filip,
On 4/27/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not quite the same as Comet. Main difference is that the
Asynchronous Servlets (AS) are not registered with the Poller.
It just means that when a HTTP request comes in, the Request/Response
pair can be handed off to a
On 4/25/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries in which I suppose a horrible bug will be found
in about 5 minutes are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.12/
Looks solid to me. Thanks for cutting it.
Yoav
Hi,
On 4/25/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll do it if no-one else steps forward.
A vote is needed to elect a new RM, so if you're candidate for the job,
you can post the vote.
Why is a vote needed? We have to vote on the release itself
obviously, but I think any committer
Hi,
On 4/24/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Frederic wrote:
Hi,
Does someone plan to release a TC 5.0.x for the last security fixes?
I have arranged jasper and the build and I still have to patch the code
for the latest security fixes. (I have already ported the
Hi,
On 4/13/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer
After playing with these candidate binaries for just an hour or so,
things look good to me.
Yoav
On 4/11/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.11/
Rémy
Hi,
On 4/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ ant tester
Buildfile: build.xml
BUILD FAILED
Target `tester' does not exist in this project.
You're right, it's gone from the 6.0 trunk. It's been in the 4.x and
5.x build.xmls, e.g.
Hi,
On 4/3/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following Remy's suggestion I implemented web.xml overrides of
annotations but although the result compiles I have no very good way
to determine if it works. I looked around a bit but didn't see any
unit tests or integration testsuite. What
Hi,
On 3/30/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied before
then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
+1.
Yoav
Hi,
The svn:externals hookup for svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current
points to the 5.5 branch trunk, as it has been for a while. Now that
we have a stable 6.0 release that would be considered current by
most definitions of the term, should we update
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current to
Hi,
On 3/25/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
The svn:externals hookup for svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current
points to the 5.5 branch trunk, as it has been for a while.
No it doesn't. /current contains three directories one for each of
tc3, tc4, tc5
Hi,
On 3/20/07, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the impossibility to guarantee that all URLs are handled by
Tomcat as they are in proxy servers, Tomcat should always be secured as
if no proxy restricting context access was used.
Comments ?
+1 to your reworked text, I like it.
Hi,
On 3/18/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.35.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-4.1.35/apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz
Surely the distro file name is wrong? Should be 4.1.35-src.tar.gz...
Tomcat 4.1.35 is:
[ X ]
Hola,
On 3/13/07, Phillip Thurmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a bug. It significantly hinders scalability under certain
workloads, and it should be fixed. As you are aware, there are many
solutions (Read/Write lock, partitioned hashmap, etc..) that do not
involve an additional
well.
Yoav Shapira, on behalf of the Tomcat PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hola,
On 3/12/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Filip, did you see that the missing MailSessionFactory bug popped back
up in this one?
I ran into it this morning, but by that time 40668 had already been
reopened.
Hi,
On 3/12/07, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are
missing for that release.
It's my fault, I apologize. I'll try to fix it ASAP.
Yoav
-
To
Hi,
On 3/12/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was downloading TC 6.0.10 and noticed that the md5sum files are
missing for that release.
It's my fault, I apologize. I'll try to fix it ASAP.
The files are there now
Hi,
This is more suited to the Tomcat users mailing list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please post follow-up there.
On 3/7/07, gregory oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is unclear to me is:
1. Is it possible to run the tomcat manager application on its own
without tomcat itself?
No.
2. How do I
Hi,
On 3/5/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.23-2/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.23 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Looking
Hi,
On 3/2/07, Steve Joynt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible/feasible to add finer control over the java compiler
used by JspC when compiling jsps?
It's probably possible, and most likely to get done if you write the
code and send in a patch yourself ;)
The ant Javac task
I get a 404 at http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
The release notes that ship with the 6.0.10 binary downloads are fine.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
in the loop please. I also told him to ask
questions, if any, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] C'est tout,
Yoav
On 3/1/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
I've contacted the Tomcat developer group, and apparently no one is
interested enough or has the time to help out with this effort right
now
101 - 200 of 475 matches
Mail list logo