https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #35 from Justin ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #34)
> Created attachment 33247 [details]
> Test patch
>
> With debug.
Excellent, this patch has resolved the problem. I tested both HTTP and HTTPS. I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #33
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33243|0 |1
is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #27 from Justin ---
Created attachment 33240
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33240=edit
Client exceptions for /trunk@1711734
Thanks for the patch! I exported, applied, built, ran.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #29 from Remy Maucherat ---
The debug info is not there however.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33234|0 |1
is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Justin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33241|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #30 from Justin ---
Created attachment 33242
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33242=edit
stderr for /trunk@1711734 with debug code
Previous attachment was catalina.out. stdout has only:
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Justin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32830|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #26 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 33234
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33234=edit
Debug code
If the exception does not occur, the code can be added to SecureNio2Channel.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #22 from Remy Maucherat ---
Investigating another issue, it seems possible this one is caused by a timeout
exception that gets swallowed, followed by a new read attempt. It is not really
a Tomcat bug if the theory
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #23 from Justin ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #21)
> This could use another trunk retest.
Built, ran /trunk@1711357. Client now throws exception connected to non-SSL
port too...
2015-10-29
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #25 from Remy Maucherat ---
When I say in the channel read, I mean here for the debug code:
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.Nio2Channel.read(Nio2Channel.java:133)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #24 from Remy Maucherat ---
Hum, it's not trunk, it's branch 8 head. Anyway, the SSL thing was just
coincidental, never mind.
It would be nice in the channel read to capture the previous stack trace (throw
and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #21 from Remy Maucherat ---
This could use another trunk retest.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Yilong Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #19 from Robert M ---
We are running into this same issue in our application and I just started to
debug the problem. The one additional piece of information I can add is that I
only get this error when I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Robert M from comment #19)
> We are running into this same issue in our application and I just started to
> debug the problem. The one additional piece of information I can
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #16)
Without a relatively simple test case, I think this should be closed for the
time being. There has to be some concurrency involved and the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #18 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
Without a test case this is going to sit in the NEEDINFO state.
Understandable. Regardless of whether there is a test case, there is a bug
causing exceptions in Tomcat 8 latest. I may not be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #14 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 32830
-- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32830action=edit
Exceptions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #15 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
Retested and reconfirmed problem with /trunk@1685924. Attached exceptions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #16 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
Without a relatively simple test case, I think this should be closed for the
time being. There has to be some concurrency involved and the framework really
gets in the way.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Any update now 8.0.23 is released? Still waiting on a test case or steps to
reproduce.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #12 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
Since there's no test case, it is worth retesting again [with trunk] since the
previous fix caused a regression.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #11 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #9)
Also, testing on Tomcat trunk may not be useless.
Same errors with Tomcat 8.0.21. When I build/run /trunk@1675728, I get:
23-Apr-2015 17:55:46.105
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #9 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
Also, testing on Tomcat trunk may not be useless.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
So the pending flag seems correct. The difference with non SSL is thus
unexplained, and this needs a (simple) testcase.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #7 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #6)
Unrelated (but useful) fixes merged in Tomcat 8 as r1672626.
I exported from ^/trunk@1672808, removed both throw ReadPendingException from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org ---
As part of the investigation I fixed some issues (r1672297) which will be
backported to Tomcat 8, but I don't see any way for the read pending flag to
have a bad state. Without some test,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #2 from Justin cry...@yahoo.com ---
There are no such problems when dropping SSL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
34 matches
Mail list logo