https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ranjit.vadak...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ---
Arguably the this issue isn't a Tomcat issue. This bug is a result of the
application using the work-around of setting the system property. That in turn
is used due to application and/or library issues
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #7 from Chris ---
Hi,
we have a central utility method to create our own instances of
"com.ctc.wstx.stax.WstxInputFactory" that is not the issue.
But we use libraries, that in the depth just call
"XMLInputFactory.newFactory()".
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
Is it possible for you to use your custom XMLInputFactory directly instead of
calling getInstance(), or do you need Tomcat's JSP compiler to use your custom
XMLInputFactory?
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #5 from Chris ---
You are absolutely right. Setting a SystemProperty within a web application is
not a desired approach.
The circumstances of our web application are rather homogeneous: it is always
installed as the one and only
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Chris from comment #2)
>
> System.setProperty(javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory.class.getName(),
> WstxInputFactory.class.getName());
>
The above line of code affects the whole JVM, not
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
:(
Sorry about that. We'll re-evaluate our solution to the opposite problem, which
is ClassLoader-pinning when the webapp's ClassLoader is used to obtain the
XMLInputFactory.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #2 from Chris ---
Yeah, it comes down to these changes:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/a2167e13c19115aecd220cd3be19d43d36126f3b
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/3b8f277a7ffc1193ed6c6d4fff85db6dc7327e39
We set a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Chris ---
I located
10 matches
Mail list logo
