Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on the users

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-18 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 Peter On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-15 Thread Henri Gomez
+1 (sic). A 6.x light edition is a very good idea 2008/2/15, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 4 years ago the last version, about 8 years ago the first (or 3.0) release... I wish we also had a '6.x-minimal' release for people wanting something very small ( and not using jetty ).

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-15 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the way Apache is structured, it is impossible to say that 3.x is no longer supported. If three PMC members were to show an interest in expanding it in the future (say myself, Costin, Henri), then the rest would

RE: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-15 Thread Larry Isaacs
I'm fine with either approach as well. Larry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yoav Shapira Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:10 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported On Thu, Feb

[PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Thomas
All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on the users list but I think it is time to draw a line under 3.x.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 Filip Mark Thomas wrote: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support question on the users list but I think it is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding a note that 3.x is no longer supported / removing much of the 3.x info from: /index.html /security-3.html /whichversion.html /bugreport.html Thoughts? +1. Yoav

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Rainer Jung
+1 We could include the info about no release for almost 4 years in the official message, so that users understand that this is not a message of bad support in general. Regards, Rainer Mark Thomas schrieb: All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Bill Barker
Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] All, The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been one security patch made available in source form and that was more an application issue than a Tomcat one. There is still the odd support

Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported

2008-02-14 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 4 years ago the last version, about 8 years ago the first (or 3.0) release... I wish we also had a '6.x-minimal' release for people wanting something very small ( and not using jetty ). Costin On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, The last 3.x release