Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop comet support in Tomcat 9 onwards

2014-12-02 Thread Nick Williams
On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: 2014-06-18 23:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop comet support in Tomcat 9 onwards

2014-12-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 6/18/14 5:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO. I would like to propose dropping support for Comet in Tomcat 9

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop comet support in Tomcat 9 onwards

2014-12-02 Thread Mark Thomas
On 02/12/2014 22:17, Christopher Schultz wrote: Mark, On 6/18/14 5:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO. I would like

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop comet support in Tomcat 9 onwards

2014-06-19 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2014-06-18 23:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO. I would like to propose dropping support for Comet in

[PROPOSAL] Drop comet support in Tomcat 9 onwards

2014-06-18 Thread Mark Thomas
I have been thinking about connector refactoring for Tomcat 9. Currently BIO is planned to be dropped due to the number of features in the servlet spec that rely on non-blocking IO. I would like to propose dropping support for Comet in Tomcat 9 onwards. The reasons are: - WebSocket is already far