Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same files somewhere.
I believe they
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same files somewhere.
I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch for
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same files somewhere.
I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
I am undecided about how to proceed with the
Hey,
On Nov 9, 2007 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
I am undecided
Didn't someone say earlier that there was a TCK issue?
Best wishes,
Paul
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[X] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
I am undecided about
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the
On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the
values if
required.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the
values if
required.
spec-quote section=SRV.16.1.1.1
... The value can be anything the server
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the
values if
required.
spec-quote section=SRV.16.1.1.1
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100%
the problem is beyond that as well.
for the header
Cookie: name1=value1; Version=1; Path=/testcookies
The cookie parsing mechanism adds 3 server cookies, one for each header
value, the end result is still one valid cookie, when the request
creates javax.servlet.http.Cookie object, since the
ignore the invalid cookie header, I was mocking around too much, I'm
still looking into the parsing a bit
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
the problem is beyond that as well.
for the header
Cookie: name1=value1; Version=1; Path=/testcookies
The cookie parsing mechanism adds 3 server
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
It is seems there are 2 problems... The version (only TCK will complain)
and we are re escaping already escaped strings. I will prepare a patch
later today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
[x ] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Thumbs up for Linux, win32 and win64!
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
Cookie: $Version=1; name1=value1; $Path=/testcookies;
$Domain=localhost
Specifically
Cookies.java - line 490
if( bytes[valueStart] =='1' valueEnd == valueStart) {
since the version is one character, then valueEnd should be
valueStart+1,
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hey,
On Nov 5, 2007 9:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
My usual testing, which is to
Hi
Test Comet NIO API, Cluster and NIO Connector.
Also 6.015 work fine with mod:jk 1.2.25 via AJP.
Peter
Am 05.11.2007 um 15:17 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15
25 matches
Mail list logo