https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #31 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
2012-02-13 20:24:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Where do we set the startStopThreads parameter value?
In the Engine component:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #32 from Chuck Caldarale chuck.caldar...@unisys.com 2012-02-13
20:41:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
Where do we set the startStopThreads parameter value?
In the Engine component:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #30 from Leslie mmmsleepyt...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 07:31:36 UTC
---
Where do we set the startStopThreads parameter value?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #29 from Guido Leenders guido.leend...@invantive.com 2011-12-04
23:00:39 UTC ---
Some experience figures for 24 contents of which 12 are heavy applications:
* original startup time with 7.0.21: 280 seconds
* with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27772|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27761|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #19 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-10-13
11:32:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created attachment 27767 [details]
Re: startStopExecutor.allowCoreThreadTimeOut(true);
I think that just using 0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #20 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-10-13
11:40:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created attachment 27767 [details]
Re: HostConfig, one more:
-hostConfig.deployWar=Deploying web application archive
On 13/10/2011 12:32, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #19 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-10-13
11:32:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created attachment 27767 [details]
Re:
2011/10/13 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
In one place Future? is used, while I think it could be FutureVoid like
in
other places.
That is the difference between a callable and runnable and I think it is
correct. At least I see errors if I try using FutureVoid there.
Do you need Runnable
On 13/10/2011 13:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/10/13 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
In one place Future? is used, while I think it could be FutureVoid like
in
other places.
That is the difference between a callable and runnable and I think it is
correct. At least I see errors if I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27767|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #22 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
2011-10-13 13:42:01 UTC ---
In ContainerBase#initInternal the ThreadPoolExecutor gets initialized with a
core pool size of 0, but if we call
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #23 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
2011-10-13 14:41:42 UTC ---
With core pool size set to 0 in ContainerBase#initInternal I get no
concurrency at startup. It will be sequential only. If I change it back
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-10-13 15:01:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
With core pool size set to 0 in ContainerBase#initInternal I get no
concurrency at startup. It will be sequential only. If I change it
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27769|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #17 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
2011-10-12 08:45:45 UTC ---
The HashMap HostConfig#deployed is used by multiple threads, but is not
synchronized.
So there could be problems, even if I haven't seen
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-10-11 11:02:10 UTC ---
I'm currently working on combining these two patches into a complete solution
that covers multi-threaded deployment, and container start and stop.
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-10-11 13:39:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 27758
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27758
Threaded start, stop and deployment fo Contexts
This proposed patch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #10 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-10-11
13:48:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
+// Zero == Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors()
+// -ve ==
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27755|0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27759|0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-10-11 15:17:17 UTC ---
I've fixed the +/- issue locally and will include that in the next version of
the patch. Thanks Konstantin for the catch.
Felix, I think you have found one of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27758|0 |1
is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #15 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2011-10-11 18:05:57 UTC ---
There is a new Digester release (3.0), but I have no idea whether it would
significantly improve speed and I suspect it's incompatible so could require
non-trivial
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #16 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2011-10-11
20:32:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
There is a new Digester release (3.0), but I have no idea whether it would
significantly improve speed
From threading
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #6 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
2011-10-10 17:42:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 27755
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27755
starting contexts in parallel using an executor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de 2011-10-10 18:05:29
UTC ---
Hi Felix,
don't want to split hairs or paint bikesheds but the attribute name seems
problematic: in TC 7 we call parallel deployment the possibility to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-10-09 16:31:14 UTC ---
A few comments on the patch.
1. Consider allowing the number of threads to be used to be configured
(probably as a attribute of the host).
2. Webapp start/stop
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #3 from Joe Kislo j...@k12s.phast.umass.edu 2010-11-29 15:14:59
EST ---
I can confirm my patch still works on Tomcat 6.0.29
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #4 from Pid bugzi...@pidster.com 2010-11-30 01:41:00 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I can confirm my patch still works on Tomcat 6.0.29
Would the java.util.concurrency package not provide a more elegant way of
solving this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #1 from Joe Kislo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 09:04:01 PST ---
I propose that during the context shutdown, tomcat use multiple threads to
shutdown the contexts in parallel.
I have attached a patch which will fire off:
2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #2 from Joe Kislo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-21 09:04:50 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22912)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22912)
Proposed patch
--
Configure bugmail:
34 matches
Mail list logo
