Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yoav,
On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few
Hey,
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
as-an-alternate category before doing any real work on it.
Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps anything. I'm
+0 to you (or anyone else) doing the work and
Hey,
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
before which is hosting it.
I don't think that's a problem, and I don't think it has to be hosted
in the
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yoav,
On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
as-an-alternate category before doing any real work on it.
Hi Yoav,
On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
as-an-alternate category before doing any real work on it.
Speaking only for myself, I don't see how waiting helps
John,
On 10/18/07, jkew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
I agree with Costin.
-1 to default
Default is out of the question.
+1 to alternative
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
as-an-alternate category before doing any real work on it.
Some points:
1. I would be a
William,
FYI - I love Gentoo.
On 10/18/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo's vote -1 for Tomcat using Maven to build instead of Ant :)
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 23:26 -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no objection
Bill,
The last thing that I want to be responsible for is introducing a
stumbling block for all of the Tomcat developers and users. This
thread should have also included Maven 2 - Migrate, Integrate, or
Annihilate.
On 10/18/07, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty much going to
On 10/18/07, Mary Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
i have been a passive listener all the while but i feel its time for change.
I vote for Maven
regards,
Mary
Thank you, Mary. However, I believe we are out-numbered. :)
On 10/18/07, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes!
I can't see that maven build is better choice.
Peter
Vote -1 for build with maven!
What if Maven 2 is added in co-existence, instead of as a replacement?
-
To
On 10/17/07, Konstantin Kolinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Paul!
You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure
there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of
svn:externals property. It is called creating a view.
Thanks Konstantin,
I agree with the
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I commit to working on it, and try to show some sort of
proof-in-the-pudding, the issue returns to the problem I mentioned
before which is hosting it.
The place that comes immediately to mind is wush.net... maybe ping
Michael Ching and
I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no objection
to having a maven build as an alternative to the ant build (assuming that it
can do the same thing, which I don't really believe without seeing the pom).
But most mavenized projects that I have see (e.g.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have a distribute to Maven repo in place.
The most current version is in the sandbox, that would allow us to
publish to the central ASF repo with signed JAR's.
This allows(will allow) other
Paul,
I agree with Costin.
-1 to default
+1 to alternative
Some points:
1. I would be a willing tester.
2. Please make sure versions are put on every plugin / dependency.
3. I have a love/hate relationship with maven. It sort of scares me.
Debugging maven hurts.
4. On the positive side, I
Remy, do you think that it would be acceptable as a test branch
(proving ground), a possible integration into a near-future release,
or do you believe that Maven is just not acceptable at all for Tomcat?
On 10/17/07, Rémy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to elaborate more for you, 6.0.x is our current 6.0 release branch.
We are using RTC, Review-Then-Commit policy here, and introducing maven
into a stable release branch like this, is probably not the best idea.
What you should focus
If nothing else comes out of this discussion thread, we will at least
hear build-process opinions from above-average developers. Thank you
in advance to all that reply.
In response to Filip :
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lemme give you my feedback and some
On 10/18/07, Paul Shemansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or
eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally
don't
see a problem with that - as long as it
On 10/17/07, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Shemansky wrote:
Key features that may be useful to us are :
- The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds.
This might make managing individual components easier for catalina,
coyote, naming, jsp/servlet
Dear Fellow Tomcat Developers,
As you may have already noticed, I recently joined the ASF and the
Tomcat Developer's List. I have been a Maven 2 user since 2005, and I
previously used Ant for all of my projects. I suffered through many
hardships migrating from Ant to Maven, but in my humble
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote:
It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven
users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully
use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
switching Tomcat's build process within
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote:
It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven
users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully
use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
switching
lemme give you my feedback and some history
Paul Shemansky wrote:
Dear Fellow Tomcat Developers,
As you may have already noticed, I recently joined the ASF and the
Tomcat Developer's List. I have been a Maven 2 user since 2005, and I
previously used Ant for all of my projects. I suffered
-1 as well on switching to maven as default ( or back to many source tree
'modules' ).
But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or
eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally don't
see a problem with that - as long as it doesn't require moving code
Paul Shemansky wrote:
Key features that may be useful to us are :
- The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds.
This might make managing individual components easier for catalina,
coyote, naming, jsp/servlet api/implementation, connector, etc.
might isn't a compelling
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have a distribute to Maven repo in place.
The most current version is in the sandbox, that would allow us to
publish to the central ASF repo with signed JAR's.
This allows(will allow) other projects that do use Maven,
Hi, Paul!
Just a suggestion how to start (seeing all the opinions around):
You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure
there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of
svn:externals property. It is called creating a view.
Having done that, it will be more
Yes!
I can't see that maven build is better choice.
Peter
Vote -1 for build with maven!
Am 18.10.2007 um 00:45 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Paul Shemansky wrote:
Key features that may be useful to us are :
- The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds.
This might make
29 matches
Mail list logo
