Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: If there's any hope of waiting a day or few, I'd like to ensure this can be configured and built to both 2.0 and 2.2 on windows and unix. Sure, no problem. I wish that we have at least a stable release as 1.2.15 was, so what ever it takes :)

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Sure, no problem. I wish that we have at least a stable release as 1.2.15 was, so what ever it takes :) Quirks; ../common/jk_ajp_common(1627) warning: loop not entered at top. Build is invoking cc (as apxs declared) using the wrong cflags (detected from ./configure

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-20 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: If there's any hope of waiting a day or few, I'd like to ensure this can be configured and built to both 2.0 and 2.2 on windows and unix. Sure, no problem. I wish that we have at least a stable release as 1.2.15 was, so what ever it takes :) Regards, Mladen.

mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk from the 1.2.15: #37469: Fix shared memory close for forked childs. #37332: Fix potential misuse of buffer length with snprintf. #38859: Protect mod_jk against buggy or malicious AJP servers. #38889: Use worker map sorting depending on

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 for that, I can made my tests at weekend. Regards Peter Am 17.03.2006 um 12:37 schrieb Mladen Turk: Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk from the 1.2.15: #37469: Fix shared memory close for forked childs. #37332: Fix potential misuse of buffer length with

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Henri Gomez
+1 2006/3/17, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 for that, I can made my tests at weekend. Regards Peter Am 17.03.2006 um 12:37 schrieb Mladen Turk: Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk from the 1.2.15: #37469: Fix shared memory close for forked

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Yoav Shapira
+1. On 3/17/06, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 2006/3/17, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 for that, I can made my tests at weekend. Regards Peter Am 17.03.2006 um 12:37 schrieb Mladen Turk: Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hey Malden, I have found one compile error: /bin/sh /Users/peter/server/apache2.0.55w/build/libtool --silent -- mode=compile gcc -I/Users/peter/server/apache2.0.55w/include -g -O2 - g -O2 -DHAVE_APR -I/Users/peter/develop/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/ apr/include

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey Malden, I have found one compile error: Can be that we must use jk_shmem.attached instead jk_shmem.hdr.attached ? Right, a stupid copy/paste error from the testing linux box to a windows one I'm using for commits. However, I saw you already commit a patch.

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk from the 1.2.15: #37469: Fix shared memory close for forked childs. #37332: Fix potential misuse of buffer length with snprintf. #38859: Protect mod_jk against buggy or malicious AJP servers. #38889: Use worker map

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: +1, but make sure you test it (I see lots of last minute fixes). Well, I hope I won't be the only one doing testing. I'll create a private .tar.gz so everyone interested (beside myself) could build and test it, before official vote and release. This is for those lazy to

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 Can you please create a windows binaries? I start testing at weekend and I hope Rainer can also do testing at solaris. Thanks peter Am 17.03.2006 um 14:27 schrieb Mladen Turk: Remy Maucherat wrote: +1, but make sure you test it (I see lots of last minute fixes). Well, I hope I

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Peter Rossbach wrote: +1 Can you please create a windows binaries? Sure. Already have them :) I start testing at weekend and I hope Rainer can also do testing at solaris. I'll put that somewhere in the people.apache.org. I'll let you know, when I upload the bins. -- Mladen.

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 for current trunk. On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Peter Rossbach wrote: Hey Malden, I have found one compile error: Can be that we must use jk_shmem.attached instead jk_shmem.hdr.attached ? Right, a stupid copy/paste error from the testing linux box to a windows one I'm

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread Chris Lamprecht
Mladen, Thanks for applying the busyness patch (and the other fixes)! Once 1.2.16 is tagged, I'll try to test it on our setup. We're still running our lb-busyness-patched version with 1.2.14. -chris On 3/17/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There is quite large list of fixed

Re: mod_jk [STATUS]

2006-03-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Chris Lamprecht wrote: Mladen, Thanks for applying the busyness patch (and the other fixes)! Once 1.2.16 is tagged, I'll try to test it on our setup. We're still running our lb-busyness-patched version with 1.2.14. If there's any hope of waiting a day or few, I'd like to ensure this can be