Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Remy, I think the patch is incomplete this line seem not correct: +else + JRE_HOME=/usr +fi better +else + JRE_HOME=/usr/bin/java +fi The path to the Java executable is $JRE_HOME/bin/java, so

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Remy, but is'nt /usr/lib/java the correct value to JRE_HOME ? Regards Peter Am 17.10.2007 um 13:10 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Remy, I think the patch is incomplete this line seem not correct: +else + JRE_HOME=/usr +

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Tim Funk
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to java. -Tim Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 for that env variable, but also autodetection must be implemented Peter Am 17.10.2007 um 13:28 schrieb Tim Funk: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to java.

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread Rainer Jung
jean-frederic clere wrote: Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can symlink

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
Rainer Jung wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter

svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-16 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Tue Oct 16 18:11:39 2007 New Revision: 585313 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585313view=rev Log: - Propose a shell script update. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-10-16 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi Remy, I think the patch is incomplete this line seem not correct: +else + JRE_HOME=/usr +fi better +else + JRE_HOME=/usr/bin/java +fi Peter Am 17.10.2007 um 03:11 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Author: remm Date: Tue Oct 16 18:11:39 2007 New Revision: 585313