On 18/05/2017 03:23, Josh Soref wrote:
A client of my employers wanted to know how much life our chosen
application hosting platform has left.
I found Mark's email [1] which suggested tomcat 6 eol [2]. That page says:
The Apache Tomcat team announces that support for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x will
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594
--- Comment #19 from Lulseged Zerfu ---
Hi
We have found that we have problems with some characters that are not allowed
in request URI and would like to know if any filter or valve can be applied to
encode until
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Lulseged Zerfu from comment #19)
> Hi
>
> We have found that we have problems with some characters that are not
> allowed in request URI and would like to know if any filter
On 18/05/2017 06:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/17/17 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I got asked in the corridor at TomcatCon earlier today what the
relative performance of the TLS handshake was with 8.5.x, the NIO
connector and JSSE vs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103
Bug ID: 61103
Summary: StatementCache potentially returning incorrect
statement
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103
Julian Reschke changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103
Julian Reschke changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
Hi all,
after troubleshoting a problem with missing headers in an app respone
i'm not sure if the behaviour that i'm seeing is a bug or the expected
behaviour.
My configuration is fairly simple:
httpd + mod_jk -> tomcat
Versions:
Apache/2.4.10
mod_jk/1.2.40
Tomcat/8.0.18
(I know i'm not using
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61105
Bug ID: 61105
Summary: Roll log files by default
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement