DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Iso Demirkaya/CH/BALOISE ist außer Haus. Ferien!

2005-11-04 Thread iso . demirkaya
Ich werde ab 04.11.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 14.11.2005. Ferien. Bin zurück am 14. November 2005. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Till Schober 032 626 08 27 oder Roland Käser 032 626 08 24. Disclaimer: The contents of this email and any attachment thereto are

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent xmlValidation Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bob Bronson wrote: Another lazy copout!! Even the web.xml that is distributed w/Tomcat does not validate! Did you even test this before you replied to my note or did you just assume the user was at fault??? When someone criticizes the poor state of an open sores project (as I am doing now),

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37350. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Rewrite features

2005-11-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: The TomcatResolver instance is holding a reference to the Request instance, and is in a TL. As a result (because of the way the ThreadPool works) it will live very much longer than just during the processing of a given Request. This is all fine for all of the current

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37356] New: - Tomcat does not invalidate sessions after session-timeout period has passed.

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37350. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37350. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent xmlValidation Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Ian Darwin
If you don't feel special enough, I can do it in two seconds and can get you a cool membership to the dev-deny list :) Maybe we could just filter out yahoo, hotmail and the other free fake web domains so that people who want to post abusive comments and use really original insults that we've

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent xmlValidation Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Bob Bronson wrote: Comments below, for any of you who care Friendly peoples always care about the needs of other... + CUT ++ I installed a fresh copy of TC 5.5.12 (using JDK 1.5.0 on Win XP). I went into the server.xml that is distributed with TC and changed the