Bill Barker wrote:
Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.5.14 is:
[ ] Stable
[X] Beta - At least one significant issue preventing stability (please
elaborate)
[ ] Alpha - Multiple significant issues (please elaborate)
BZ 37852 is about as
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36911.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tino Schwarze wrote:
What do you think about this issue?
It's a fine solution for your problem, I suppose. Thanks for the
patch, but we are not going to use it.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36591.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37854.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
What do you think about this issue?
It's a fine solution for your problem, I suppose. Thanks for the
patch, but we are not going to use it.
So could you please give me a hint, why you are not going to use it? My
problem is a
Hi Tino.
Have you searched the tomcat lists (user mostly I would say) for memory
related issues? There have been a large number of posts, including many
with pointers - not just assigning more JVM Heap - but actual tewaks,
settings, approaches to solving issues in varied cirumstances.
I think
One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
size of the buffers, and only reset it if it is indeed 'huge'. This
would take care of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37956.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36591.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36591.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: billbarker
Date: Sun Dec 18 16:48:43 2005
New Revision: 357589
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357589view=rev
Log:
Restrict jsp:getAttribute / to only look in PAGE_SCOPE.
This is per the JSP spec section 5.3. It would be nice to be able to do this
at translation time (as
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: billbarker
Date: Sun Dec 18 17:39:19 2005
New Revision: 357605
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357605view=rev
Log:
doc change
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All,
What is required for a servlet to be able to
behave like the JMXProxyServlet in tomcat manager
application?
Thanks In Advance
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Look at the literature on JMX. Interesting stuff!
On 12/18/05, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
What is required for a servlet to be able to
behave like the JMXProxyServlet in tomcat manager
application?
Thanks In Advance
Anita
22 matches
Mail list logo
