Hello dev,
About a half a year ago I've found that my webapp works fine in
development environment, but leaks memory in production one.
I've searched through all the code, found a few minor errors, but it
didn't help.
(of course, tag pooling are disabled completely)
So then i've tried to use
Costin Manolache wrote:
Assuming that most of the pages use 'huge' buffers - you're right.
However, if you have few pages that need large buffers - and most
don't - this will help.
And you would pay the price of System.arraycopy on the bad pages - i.e. normal
pages will be faster, and jsps that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37977.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 20 09:02:33 2005
New Revision: 358036
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358036view=rev
Log:
- Add two system properties (as given the JSP API, there is no easy solution to
retrieve configuration parameters elsewhere) to allow configuring Jasper
memory
Hi there,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:02:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Dec 20 09:02:33 2005
New Revision: 358036
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358036view=rev
Log:
- Add two system properties (as given the JSP API, there is no easy solution
to
Hi,
Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not seem too
overwhelming, most of the specification work is on support of JSP 2.1. I
am happy to report that Jacob Hookom is willing to contribute code to
add the necessary JSP support in Tomcat (he has done such an
implementation
+1
Costin
On 12/20/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not seem too
overwhelming, most of the specification work is on support of JSP 2.1. I
am happy to report that Jacob Hookom is willing to contribute code to
add the
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:32 PM
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat 6 plans (JSP 2.1)
Hi,
Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not seem too
overwhelming, most of the
There was some talk of merging the modules in 6, is there any objection
to that?
Keith
Bill Barker wrote:
I agree that the changes for Servlet 2.5 aren't that bad, but we might as
well branch Container while we are at it.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Slight juxtaposition of your message:
This certainly seems a lot more limited than the way it worked in TC
5.0. I wonder if I need to file this as a bug or a feature enhancement.
If you have any ideas, I'd love to hear them.
second step that I don't
Hi,
PS: Question to the developers: I'd like to have a Host without
appBase (only 1 app and outside) - is this supported?
AFAIK, no: a Host must have an appBase, explicitly or implicitly.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
Great idea-- where can I find this method
ServletContext.getContextName? It appears non-existent. There is a
method ServletContext.getServletContextName()
That's the method I meant, but I'd forgotten it returns the
description and not the name. getServletPath() is a hack as you
Hi,
Replying to three messages n one: see inline.
Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not seem too
overwhelming, most of the specification work is on support of JSP 2.1.
My observation as well.
am happy to report that Jacob Hookom is willing to contribute code to
add the
Jason Novotny wrote:
Hmm, can you tell me where this convention is defined anywhere? This
is not just a problem for my portal but a few others out there that have
presented instructions that no longer work. If say three portal projects
including Pluto and Jetspeed claim this is a problem
The EL implementation that I would be rolling in was one I wrote for the
JSP-EG/WebTier alignment and was licensed within Sun's Glassfish server
and used within Sun's Facelets technology for JavaServer Faces. It's a
complete depart from commons-el in implementation and optimized for
expression
Yoav Shapira wrote:
If they explain their desired functionality exactly, we can certainly
discuss it further. I still wouldn't call it a bug because it's
functioning as designed for 5.5 (as noted previously, this is slightly
different from 5.0).
The point was to remove redundant information
Does anyone know how to unsbubscribe from this list? I have sent 20 mails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but nothing helps!
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20. december 2005 22:41
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: TC 5.5.12 WARNING: A docBase XXX
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21440.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
24 matches
Mail list logo
