this
attribute to https for an SSL Connector. The default value is http.
See SSL Support for more information.
Rainer Jung
Tino Schwarze wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:24:52PM -0800, Casey Haakenson wrote:
We have a customer who is hitting our web GUI through a fairly
complicated SSH proxy
Hi Mladen,
are you sure? I have the impression default is
c-options = JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULT;
and
#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULTJK_OPT_FWDURICOMPAT
#define JK_OPT_FWDURICOMPAT 0x0001
but needed is
#define JK_OPT_FLUSHPACKETS 0x0020
It looks like JK_OPT_FLUSHPACKETS is
Hi Filip, hi all developers,
I think TC clustering from a users perspective got more robust in the
last two years. Whe we started playing around with it in 2004 it was
great, that we all basic functionality already worked, but you might
remember, that I contributed a couple of fixes to make
Hi Filip,
thanks for taking it seriously!
1. If we don't primary/secondary will not be available until TC.6
3. Many people are opting out of clustering today because of lack of
primary/sec. all-to-all is too inefficient for the general public
I understand your primary motivation. It#s
+1 (non-binding)
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
+1 from myself
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Sounds like there is a consensus amongst folks. So to summarize
everyones thoughts, let me know if this sounds like a solution
agreeable to everyone.
1. Keep 5.5.x as a maintenance module as it
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=380835view=rev
Log:
Fix for bug
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740
looks like we got trigger happy with the resetDeltaRequest
Thanks to Nick Wesselman and Rainer Jung that pointed this out.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules
Hi,
I started to trace TC cluster with DTrace. I did a first simple exam for
the mcast subcomplex. CPU usage and especially elapsed times might be
slightly larger than expected, because I used the more intrusive
extended DTrace probes.
All tests were done with JDK 1.6.0 build 72 on Solaris 10
synchronized calls locking down the sockets, the code is somewhat
cluttered then I am gonna move on to serialization. In the current
cluster module, too much gets serialized, in the new module ha I have
already removed a lot of serialization and will continue stripping it out.
Filip
Rainer Jung wrote
I have a small patch that I think improves the session listing in the
manager webapp:
The doc says
Session Statistics
Display the default session timeout for a web application, and the
number of currently active sessions that fall within ten-minute ranges
of
Hi Remy,
I saw you taking over classes from commons modeler into tc 6. Just
yesterday William Barker commited a very small and non-risky patch I
submitted two years ago to bugzilla against Registry.convertValue():
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31608
The method has
While playing around with svn checkout of mod_jk trunk (1.2.16-dev) I
saw, that in jk/native/configure.in there is still a line
VERSION=1.2.14
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
to be relevent for distribution
building, which Mladen said does not exist. So we might be able to throw
it out completely.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
While playing around with svn checkout of mod_jk trunk (1.2.16-dev) I
saw, that in jk/native/configure.in there is still a line
VERSION
Some hints, although I didn't go deeper into it and most of it might
still be experimental:
1) Java Isolate API JSP-221
http://java.sys-con.com/read/99716.htm
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=121
2) Building on top Java Resource Consumption Management API JSR-284
I logged a bug a couple of days ago:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39218
Since nobody gave any response, I wanted to ping the list.
The current implementation of the server, common and shared class
loaders use the catalina.properties file to make the group of
repositories
svn: Commit failed
...
403 Forbidden (http://svn.apache.org)
Seriously: I would like to, but I'm only a contributor :)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
I logged a bug a couple of days ago:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39218
I found this was a reasonable
Hi List, hi Mladen (master of mod_jk):
a year ago we changed to algorithm in mod_jk, that counts weighted
requests in the lb worker to decide, which balanced worker should
receive the next request.
The new algorithm three main advantages:
a) using only integers
b) using only a limited range
OK, I expect to send the patches late Friday german time (tomorrow, but
in 3 minutes today).
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Good news.
Will you cut another mod_jk version close to 5.5.17 (it will be to late
for that one), or are you planning to keep 1.2.16 in development for at
least 1
Hi Mladen,
I've got another one for that file. You optimized the original Solaris
contribution by changing division with a value to multiplication with
the reciprocal value. Unfortunately we are in integer land and the
divisor was bigger than 1, so now we always multiply by 0 :(
Patch attached
I sent a patch for the Solaris part of tcnative to Mladen and the list
this morning which is not yet included. The Bug is *not* critical (CPU
used and idle in the manager status page for Solaris will be 0 always).
Rainer
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Is tcnative 1.1.3 ready? The default build
If you are going to build it yourself, it will work with versions much
older than 2.0.54. I checked the change list for API changes of apache
and found nothing that's related to what mod_jk uses at least back until
2.0.41. I think 2.0.54 is pretty save.
But: If you are simply downloading
Hi,
I shortly want to remind everyone, that our release vote for mod_jk
1.2.19 will start tomorrow.
So all users still have some time to give us positive or negative
feedback on the release candidate. Until now, no issues have been found.
You can find 1.2.19 under:
Hello to all Tomcat project members,
mod_jk 1.2.19 has been available for testing for nearly 4 days now.
For those interested, these are the download numbers for the first three
days:
10 source/jk-1.2.19/tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-src.tar.gz
1
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.19 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Rainer
-
To
The results of the vote are:
Stable: 4+1 votes (Mladen, Henri, Peter, Rainer and Jim mailed a +1
before the vote started)
Beta, Alpha: None.
I'm now going to move everything to the download area, updating docs,
updating cgi, mailing announcement ...
The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of version 1.2.19 of the Apache Tomcat mod_jk web server connector.
mod_jk is a connector which allows a web server such as Apache HTTPD
to act as a front end to the Tomcat web application server.
This version contains
The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of version 1.2.19 of the Apache Tomcat mod_jk web server connector.
mod_jk is a connector which allows a web server such as Apache HTTPD
to act as a front end to the Tomcat web application server.
This version contains
Thanks for the hint. I fixed it. Unfortunately SetEnv takes a space and
SetEnvIf an equals sign. That's were I broke the doc.
Jeff Johnson wrote:
It took me a while to figure out why the example at the very bottom of
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/apache.html kept throwing
an
ballot
[X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
fredk2 wrote:
The question is - how can you set secret in mod_proxy_ajp ?
Not at the moment.
If this feature is not (yet) implemented, can this be easily added - aka can
we expect this in a later version :) ?
Please let me know if this post should be made on apache-httpd dev forum.
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I plan to tag 6.0.0 late friday.
Is it ok ?
OK for me.
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Filip,
the fluctuation reminds me of something: depending on the client
behaviour connections will end up in TIME_WAIT state. Usually you run
into trouble (throughput stalls) once you have around 30K of them. They
will be cleaned up every now and then by the kernel (talking about the
request over 1 connection, and repeat.
Every time I did the single connection request, it does a 1sec delay,
this cause the CPU to drop.
So basically, the NIO connector sucks majorly if you are a single user
:), I'll trace this one down.
Filip
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip
Sorry: Solaris VALUE_IN_SECONDS - VALUE_IN_MILLISECONDS
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Hi Filip,
that's one of the not so nice things with linux. As far as I know it's
not configurable with standard linux. There exist kernel patches for
this and there is an ip filter module that lets you do
a 1sec
delay, this cause the CPU to drop.
So basically, the NIO connector sucks majorly if you are a single
user :), I'll trace this one down.
Filip
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
the fluctuation reminds me of something: depending on the client
behaviour connections will end up
Hi Bill,
Bill Barker schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
@@ -68,7 +62,6 @@
c = (unsigned int)*++k;\
checksum |= c; \
} \
-
Hi,
Sandy McArthur schrieb:
The way it works is the StandardSessionFacade is referenced like it
was with the facade field in StandardSession and a WeakReference to
the StandardSessionFacade is added the the field facadeReference.
After the maxInactiveInterval the facade field is set to null.
Hi,
follow the list. I expect, that we will prepare 1.2.20 for release
during this month.
Regards,
Rainer
Sven Köhler schrieb:
i see, you're developing Tomcat 6.0.
Will Tomcat 6.0 send flush packets, when the flush()-method of the
OutputStreams or the Writers are called?
Yes. It's done in
Hi Filip,
I think Mladen prepares for native 1.1.7. He updated the
build.properties earlier today from 1.1.6 to 1.1.7.
See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=116342212016165w=2
and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=116324833720513w=2
It looks like you have fallen into
I added a comment concerning a little experiment I did to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-66
Regards,
Rainer
Darryl Miles schrieb:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I disagree: if the security manager is there, then there should be no
way to get the internal object.
Yes. Maybe the
Hello Jean-Frederic,
there is a problem with the instdso.sh you checked in. It removes a
couple of files at the end, including the mod_jk.la file. When we run
make install afterwards, apxs again tries to run instdso.sh from it's
apache installation and complains about the missing mod_jk.la.
as it is at the
moment is a release show stopper (and I plan to start releasing next week).
Regards,
Rainer
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Hello Jean-Frederic,
there is a problem with the instdso.sh you checked in. It removes a
couple of files at the end, including the mod_jk.la file. When we run
make install
Hi Takayuki,
Thank you. I committed your suggested patch. It will be released with
version 1.2.20, which should be available for tests in a few days.
I added a couple of warnings to the documentation:
Please note, that session stickyness and perfect load balancing are
conflicting targets,
Mladen Turk schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
((rc = ajp_connection_tcp_send_message(ae, op-request,
l)) != JK_TRUE)) {
if (rc != JK_FATAL_ERROR) {
-jk_log(l, JK_LOG_INFO,
+jk_log(l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
(%s) error
1.2.19.
Regards,
Rainer
2006/11/21, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jean-frederic Clere schrieb:
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 06:52 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
E.g. if one empties the uriworkermap.properties, reloading it does
not
change the internal mount list. Temporarily
Takayuki Kaneko schrieb:
Thank you for pointing out!
I'll try this setting next time. Actually, I patched mod_jk to output
the every worker's lb_value on every requests. In my analysis, it was
the following situation.
(Of cause the numbers of lb_value aren't real.)
* before test
tomcat1
Hi,
I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturday.
Anyone else
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
me in the next days, but I would
) on the
copnfig dir adding to workers.properties, Apache and IIS a fourth menu item.
Regards
2006/11/23, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
additions to the status worker, and only
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'm doing extensive use VirtualHost and no-jk directive on our Apache
2.0.x servers so I'm very carefull about any changes in these area.
There is one strange thing concerning apache and JkEnvVar. The mod_jk
code handles them, as if it would make sense to have the same env
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve. The rest of the things, I want to work on (depending
on time) concerns only much smaller code areas:
- checking consistency for logging/%R/NOTES concerning worker name
versus jvmRoute
- XML and txt mime
Hi Mladen,
very nice idea making things easier for users. I like it. But dots are
standard separation characters in host names and host names might not be
totally uncommon as jvm routes. I know, that they can be symbolic, but
we might break configs or deny using such a simple way of matching
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve.
Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really great!
I think we'll have a best ever mod_jk.
Thanks for the credits, I hope they work.
However I
. So I don't see a big difference.
But maybe I overlooked something.
I find this discussion helpful!
Regards,
Rainer
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve.
Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really
Gotcha. OK.
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
very nice idea making things easier for users. I like it. But dots are
standard separation characters in host names and host names might not be
totally uncommon as jvm routes. I know, that they can be symbolic, but
we might
OK, convinced. I'll change that tomorrow and add a respective note to
the docs fpr ajp retries in relation to lb.
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
In my opinion the only change is:
- old code: retries=2 means first try to close all conns and second try
with new connection
- new code
Hi Mladen,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
@@ -1220,12 +1220,25 @@
...
/* Connect to the backend.
* This can be either uninitalized connection or a reconnect.
*/
if (ajp_connect_to_endpoint(ae, l) == JK_TRUE) {
+/* should we send a CPING to
Tim Whittington schrieb:
The JK docs state:
If the value 4 is added to the recovery options, the connection between the
webserver and tomcat will be closed if the client connection to the webserver
is terminated during the request/response cycle. This allows to inform the
servlet engine
Hi Mladen,
since this has already been out in the wild for a few month, I'd prefer
to add the old one to the deprecation list in jk_util.c and in the docs
and to have the get function fall back to the original one, if the new
attribute is empty (like for disable/stop - activation).
Regards,
From a very personal view I'm tempted to share Mladens dislike of
trailing spaces. If I try to express, why I don't like them, then it all
comes back to diffs.
Trailing spaces increase the potential of diff lines with no functional
differences. Nevertheless one wastes time to check very
Hello Chris,
thanks for your original Busyness contribution.
I'm not a big fan of transporting container meta information on top of
usual request/response traffic. I know we don't have anything else we
could easily use yet.
1) There is no built in protocol support in ajp13 for other types
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anthony Vromant wrote:
Would it be possible to integrate such a feature in the original
mod_jk ? If yes, we may contribute to the development by providing our
code.
There is no need to ask something like that.
Just like for any other patch bring in the code,
and we'll
of days to report problems early, before we tag the
release. Again, all changes will be contained in the configuration
reference guide.
Regards,
Rainer
Anthony Vromant wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anthony Vromant wrote:
Would it be possible to integrate such a feature
Hi Mladen,
the different notations confuse me: some parts use retry_on_status,
and some http_status_fail. I think the implementation does fail on
configured status code, whereas the name of the config param suggests
retry=do not fail on configured status code.
I would suggest, to rename the
Hi,
I think Mladen and I completed our code change plans for the next
release of mod_jk. Since over all we had more changes than we expected
when we started for 1.2.20 I would like to give the opportunity of
testing, before I do the tagging. In case no show stoppers will be found
I suggest
Hi,
Mladen Turk provided Windows Binaries for win32 (Apache mod_jk, IIS
isapi plugin and Netscape nsapi plugin) and for win64 (AMD+IA64 isapi
plugin):
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries
Thanks Mladen and happy testing to everybody.
Regards,
Rainer
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if ((session != null) !session.isValid())
session = null;
if (session != null) {
+if(!requestedSessionId.equals(session.getId())) {
+Cookie cookie = new
My impression now is, that we should backout the commit and the user
should instead first try to use the existing Valve as described by Peter.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if ((session != null
If noone finds a reason for it, I can go into it during the weekend. I
would try to reproduce and research on Solaris. Concerning your data for
Solaris: Apache and Tomcat were both on Solaris? The same machine or
different? Network between Client (Browser?) and Apache was 100MBit or
1GBit?
, but making available all the maps to it will be a major
refactoring in the jk code (for apache, IIS can already see all the maps).
Regards,
Rainer
David Rees schrieb:
On 12/6/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- reworked status worker (see new docs page)
On my status worker page, I get
Hello to all Tomcat project members,
mod_jk 1.2.20 has been available for testing during the last week. No
new bugs have been reported so far, so I would like to proceed with the
release vote.
If you want to take a look, the source distribution can be downloaded from:
Hi,
yes I looked at the animation. Although I must confess, that I don't get
much out of it technically. What's the reason for the need to test
session validity? Is it needed to find out, if a node already got
upgraded to a new app version, so the session needs to get routed to a
node, still
Henri Gomez schrieb:
people.apache.org seems to be down ;(
and up again. Hopefully stable (p.a.o).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK with me, thanks for doing this.
Yoav Shapira schrieb:
Hi,
Here's an updated draft with PMC feedback. Take a day or two to
comment if you'd like: I'm aiming to send this in to the Board by 5pm
EST tomorrow (Monday).
Yoav
--- Begin Draft ---
Apache Tomcat Board Report, December
Hi Jess,
I did some simple tests and was not able to reproduce your performance
observations. Nevertheless I could observe a couple of strange things,
but I doubt, if they are relevant to most use cases.
First my setup:
Apache 2.0.59 worker with mod_jk 1.2.20 and Tomcat 5.5.17 with normal
Hi Anthony,
Anthony Vromant schrieb:
Here is the explanation about the session validity checking :
This test aims to have users with expired sessions and URL encoded
bookmarks
(or long running browsers with cookies cached) redirected to a node
hosting the new version of the application.
Anthony Vromant schrieb:
Hi,
The scenario you explained me doesn't work in my env. I'm trying to find
out the reasons below :
Here is the code :
jk_lb_worker.c : find_bysession_route()
candidate = find_by_session(p, name, l);
if (!candidate) {
uses_domain = 1;
You are right. I fixed it in svn HEAD.
Thanks for spotting that!
Regards,
Rainer
Takayuki Kaneko schrieb:
Hi,
I found a mismatch between the document and source code about the
default value of retries.
It's my understanding that the default value was changed from 3 to 2 at
r420266.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.20 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
... and now proceeding to the announcement ...
The results of the vote are:
Stable: 5 votes (Henri, Yoav, Mladen, Jean-Frederic, Jim, Rainer)
Beta, Alpha: None.
I'm waiting for the automatic copy from p.a.o to t.a.o before announcing.
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of version 1.2.20 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors.
It contains connectors, which allow a web server such as Apache HTTPD,
Microsoft IIS and Sun Web Server to act as a front end to the Tomcat web
application server.
This
Oh, I overlooked that one. Changes it too for 1.2.21 and on the web
site. The web site needs a few hours to sync. Thanks again for spotting it.
Rainer
Takayuki Kaneko wrote:
Hi, Rainer
I saw three in the description column. :)
Regards,
-Takayuki
This has been done on October 29th in revision r468936 fpr TC 5.5 too.
It should be part of 5.5.21, which hat not been scheduled yet.
Regards,
Rainer
Sven Köhler wrote:
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
i see, you're developing Tomcat 6.0.
Will Tomcat 6.0 send flush packets,
Hi Bill,
I took the changes over from jni to jk just for the same reasons. I hope
Mladen will sync with apr. No commit rights on my side.
Regards,
Rainer
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hello Jakarta folks,
the apr folks would appreciate if improvements were pushed back to
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
Hi,
6.0.7 is:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have to
do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code I
find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial.
The behaviour needs to be described depending on
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I want to find out how to correctly fix BZ 41430 and 36121. They have
to do with the way mod_dir and mod_jk interact. Before fixing the code
I find it necessary to define the correct behaviour, which seems to be
non-trivial
I think we agree, that DirectoryIndex should not replace the
welcome-file list on the Tomcat side.
This means at least: if non of the entries in the DirectoryIndex list is
visible by Apache, it should not try to prepend any of them to the URL
and send to Tomcat, even if this would match a
Hi Henri,
there have been two bug fixes concerning string formatting, which have
core dump potential. Both only occur with log level info or above. I
think they are *not* the reason (see below). The code is in
common/jk_ajp_common.c:
1) Wrong order of arguments; should only be relevant, if
Hi Eric,
maybe your observation is in fact related to Henri's, since you also get
core dumps (segmentation faults), which is quite unusual. See further
comments inline.
Eric Wertman wrote:
Sorry to jump in, I'm new here. I started watching this list because of
a problem I'm having with the
Yes, thanks mark. I didn't build it, because I told Peter about the
changes and he needs to do some cleanup for the jkstatus ant taks any ways.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 31 16:59:17 2007
New Revision: 502062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502062
Log:
Only depending on the number of workers (including load balancing sub
workers). The unit is Kilobytes and the default is calculated for 64
workers, although, it might be slightly less at the moment. If you
assume 1KB per worker, you should be on the safe side.
Regards,
Rainer
Eric Wertman
Hi Jean-Frederic,
shouldn't we be able to find out about the necessity to include it via
configure? At least HP-UX should be able to use the configure mechanism.
I think we mostly use the hard coded defines for the platforms, where we
can't use the configure mechanism.
Regards,
Rainer
to rebuild configure via buildconf.sh after
changing configure.in.
Regards,
Rainer
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Don't we also have a HPUX11 specific check like
the 2nd line after this one? Seems consistent to me :/
On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
shouldn't we
You are right.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try:
-#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) !defined(AS400) !defined(CYGWIN)
!defined(HPUX11)
+#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) !defined(AS400) !defined(CYGWIN)
!defined
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:
1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6
2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
3. wait 2-3 days for testing
4. call for alpha/beta/stable vote
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Fix bug in adding content-length header (BZ 41610).
Analyzed and patch contributed by Boris Maras.
if (need_content_length_header
-!strcasecmp(s-headers_values[i],
content-length)) {
+
Hi Mladen,
until 1.2.19 JkEnvVar would throw apache configuration error, if only
called with one argument. The behaviour of 1.2.20 and 1.2.21 is the same
as before, if you use a second argument.
It was only in 1.2.20, that we introduced the possibility to omit the
second argument, so give
Please read my reply describing the detailed consequences of this change.
The behaviour only changes n a corner case, which only exists since our
latest version 1.2.20, wihch is not very old. everything that was
possible with JkEnvVar before 1.2.20 neither changed in 1.2.20 not due
to this patch.
What is still open:
A Henri's core dumps on iSeries
B The other user with protocol corruption on AIX for worker MPM
C Porting 41439 from IIS to Apache
and maybe
D New design of interaction of mod_jk ForwardDirectories and httpd
DirectoryIndex (BZ 41430, BZ 36121)
E BZ 41330/40310
F
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
What is still open:
I would like to give A-C a chance until end of the week and would then
This week or a next?
We have a Security issue that requires release ASAP.
This week.
I would be interested in the Security issue. If appropriate use direct
1 - 100 of 2003 matches
Mail list logo
