https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 8|Tomcat Modules
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
Can you try 8.5.95 ?
Otherwise this change could cause it (but it looks ok to me though):
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/d54915ea205659f76108d4cd11808a9f31892ca3
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68092
Bug ID: 68092
Summary: Failed to connect database after upgrading to
tomcat-8.5.94 in linux
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.94
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
Anurag Dubey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anura...@amazon.com
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
Bug ID: 68089
Summary: ApplicationHttpRequest.getSpecial() and
removeSpecial() use linear scans
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
--- Comment #6 from lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr ---
Thanks for your quick fix.
But if you call toStringType() and after toString() method, your toString()
method has not the same result because type attribute has been updated. Maybe
it's
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
Changes to the behaviour of MessageBytes has previously introduced subtle bugs.
I am therefore extremely reluctant to make the changes suggested in comment #0
or comment #3.
Caching the values as suggested
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65111
--- Comment #2 from Roman ---
Thanks, this solved the issue for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68068
--- Comment #1 from John Engebretson ---
Perhaps a simpler solution is to change Node from an interface to an abstract
class, then have SimpleNode extends Node rather than implement it. This
achieves the same ends with more targeted
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
--- Comment #5 from Channa ---
Thank you for the fix.
Would like to know, When Tomcat version 9.0.83 is available ?
Thanks
Channa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68068
Anurag Dubey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anura...@amazon.com
OS
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68068
Bug ID: 68068
Summary: Hotspot in Ast*Nodes: itable method calls
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Many thanks for the clear, reproducible test case. I am able to reproduce this.
I haven't confirmed the analysis but it looks right.
I'm looking at potential fixes now.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67080
John Engebretson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #21 from John
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927
--- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov ---
I have been running the change now for couple of hours on HP-UX and Windows on
Tomcat 9.0.x. I cannot make it crash anymore.
Anyone else? This issue may have been satisfied.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #8)
> Just tested. From a documentation PoV, this is fine now, though I wonder how
> many people will run OpenSSL from main instead of the LTS branch.
I s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
--- Comment #8 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
> Fixed in:
> - 11.0.x for 11.0.0-M14 onwards
> - 10.1.x for 10.1.16 onwards
> - 9.0.x for 9.0.83 onwards
> - 8.5.x for 8.5.96 onwards
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #6 from adwsingh ---
To be clear I don't expect the async and sync version to work the same way. I
do however expect to be able to achieve the same result using async that I was
able to do using sync.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927
--- Comment #14 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #13)
> I've pushed the fix to all the branches. I've been running the test with a
> reload interval of 5s and have not been able to trigger the issue for a
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ---
I've pushed the fix to all the branches. I've been running the test with a
reload interval of 5s and have not been able to trigger the issue for a while
with this patch in place.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas ---
I can reproduce it and I think I have a fix. Whether it is a complete fix is
TBD. I need to tidy things up before committing and then others can test.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #5 from adwsingh ---
@remm is there a way to do it in a non-blocking fashion then?
I want to send back a 408 on a SocketTimeoutException while reading the
request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #4 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
These checks are needed, feel free to post on the user mailing list for further
help.
Ok for optimizing
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/de69069ae4c847165a9f68754faf02dbc106b21d
but it is a very
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
Jens Zurawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.0.52 |9.0.50
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
Jens Zurawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Jens Zurawski
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
--- Comment #3 from lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr ---
Or maybe just update with this code to keep the behaviour described in the
getType() Javadoc ?
public void setBytes(byte[] b, int off, int len) {
byteC.setBytes(b, off, len
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
Bug ID: 68054
Summary: DirResourcesSet: getCanonicalPath is very slow in
windows
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.52
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
--- Comment #2 from lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr ---
Maybe, it's possible to cache in the caller ?
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/main/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java
For all coyoteRequest.*.toString() calls ?
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #3 from adwsingh ---
@markt do you know why we check here [1] if its an asyncError and only then
choose to process the SocketEvent?
[1]
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/9.0.x/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProcessor.java
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #2 from adwsingh ---
@markt do you know why we check here [1] if its an asyncError and only then
choose to process the SocketEvent?
[1]
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/9.0.x/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProcessor.java
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
brandg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from brandg
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Higgs ---
Reproducer Steps
This reproducer creates an artificially large ClientHello that causes Tomcat to
respond with an SSL alert on TLS 1.3 session resumption. In this test case, a
certificate
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
--- Comment #6 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5)
> If we pass ciphers directly to OpenSSL then we get different behaviour
> between JSSE and OpenSSL. This is the issue the current design is trying to
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
If we pass ciphers directly to OpenSSL then we get different behaviour between
JSSE and OpenSSL. This is the issue the current design is trying to avoid - or
at least highlight when it happens.
What you
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
I think there are two separate issues here.
1. When Spring sets jakarta.servlet.error.exception that triggers Tomcat's
internal error handling. Whether Spring should do that and whether that should
have
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Nils Kohrs from comment #4)
> Here is a minimal project to reproduce it:
> https://github.com/nilskohrs/tomcat-bug-66875
Thanks. This reproduces the issue as originally described with
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
The simpler test case behaves as desired if the response buffer is flushed
after the application provided error response is written.
I'm not convinced that the test case completely reproduces the reported
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
adwsingh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adwsi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #1 from adwsingh ---
I traced the problem to this line in AbstractProcessor :
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/9.0.x/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProcessor.java#L121
This will not dispatch if the container thread is the one
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
Bug ID: 68037
Summary: Async Servlet implementation doesn't allow setting a
response status
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.82
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
Bug ID: 68035
Summary: Deploying a directory from Host appBase fails
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.15
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Servlet |Catalina
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
--- Comment #3 from Channa ---
Hi Tomcat Team,
Any update on solution or future release which resolves this issue.
Thanks
Channa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
lucas.pou...@lpoconseil.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |regression
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Bug ID: 68026
Summary: org.apache.tomcat.buf.MessageBytes.toString() is no
longuer cached
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.15
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68005
Bug ID: 68005
Summary: yyyrty
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68004
Bug ID: 68004
Summary: ffgghh
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Bug ID: 68003
Summary: ggdf
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68002
Bug ID: 68002
Summary: rdrrt
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67993
Bug ID: 67993
Summary:
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68001
Bug ID: 68001
Summary: r
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68000
Bug ID: 68000
Summary: r
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67990
Bug ID: 67990
Summary: tttr
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Bug ID: 67989
Summary: trttt
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
Bug ID: 67999
Summary: e
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67998
Bug ID: 67998
Summary: rrt
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67997
Bug ID: 67997
Summary:
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67996
Bug ID: 67996
Summary: rtt
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67995
Bug ID: 67995
Summary: ttyyy
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67994
Bug ID: 67994
Summary:
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
Bug ID: 67992
Summary: eee
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
Bug ID: 67991
Summary:
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67988
Bug ID: 67988
Summary: ttt
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67987
Bug ID: 67987
Summary: azaa
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67986
Bug ID: 67986
Summary: azaa
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67981
Bug ID: 67981
Summary: aaa
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
Bug ID: 67985
Summary: azaa
Product: Tomcat Modules
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: jdbc-pool
601 - 700 of 46974 matches
Mail list logo
