Title: Message Title
There's 1 new comment on this page
Servlet TCK 5.0
Remy Maucherat
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/338/files#diff
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 16:03 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
I disagree since:
- this is only in 8.0.x and we haven't had a stable release yet.
- the user has to create the gzip'd version which is unlikely to exist
be default before this feature does anything
I also think it should be disabled by
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 06:34 -0700, Mark Thomas wrote:
Non-blocking IO with non-upgraded streams still uses the standard
buffering mechanisms.
I agree some clarification is required. When section 5.1 discusses
buffering, it does so in the context of the ServletResponse object so it
isn't
Hi Mark,
Unless I missed something, Websockets 1.0 on Servlet 3.1 upgrade doesn't
do much flushing, so that the IS/OS used in upgrade must effectively
just write immediately the data (and ensure it is really sent over the
wire).
I find that a bit weird, since during the design of Servlets 3.1,
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 08:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
a) The container defined SCIs need to be loaded first. Any other
solution places an unnecessary burden on application developers. It is
reasonable for application developers to expect that if a container
advertises support for WebSocket,
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 17 14:14:28 2013
New Revision: 1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
Log:
Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
order and modify JasperELResolver so the
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 28 14:14:09 2013
New Revision: 1518214
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1518214
Log:
Add new resolvers to default resolver (bug spotted by remm)
DefaultResolver = new CompositeELResolver();
+
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Mark Thomas wrote:
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.0-RC1/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-048/
The svn tag is:
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:36 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Once all that is done I was thinking about some form of alpha release
before starting work on the EL stuff.
I tested the EL 3 RI with Jasper, and (as expected) it is still as
pluggable as it used to, and it works well.
The amount of new
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 13:54 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
What has made changes in this area difficult in the past is a) a lack of
a clear definition as to what the expected behaviour is and b) a lack of
test cases to validate that behaviour.
a) is very true ...
Anyway, I think it's very good to
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:17 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.37/
According to the release process, the 6.0.37 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_37 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X]
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 21:41 -0400, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/04/2013 09:43, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Are there any good Servlet 3.1 tests around ? (besides the websockets
impl)
Not yet. We have Filip's initial implementation and a few associated
tests but that is it. The Servlet 3.1
Hi,
Are there any good Servlet 3.1 tests around ? (besides the websockets
impl)
I doubt the Servlet TCK will have that sort of stuff, Servlet 3.0 wasn't
very good for that beyond testing of a few specific aspects.
Rémy
-
To
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 20:46 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 20 20:46:04 2013
New Revision: 1459043
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1459043
Log:
Add new methods
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/core/TesterContext.java
Sorry about that ...
I'm
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 20:52 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I mean check for Socket.setsbb somewhere after the socket is
returned from poller. Either the new buffer has been set or
the buffer address is different because of Socket.sendbb's offset param
(in this case it would be -11530560 so some
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 00:25 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have been tracking down a problem with the Autobahn test suite and
APR/native connector when using SSL (all is fine with non-SSL).
In the test Autobahn sends a 16MB frame to the server which the server
echos back to the client.
The
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 13:25 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. I tried a few of them (the less invasive ones)
with no luck. I'm putting together a test case that demonstrates the
problem. That should make it very simple to determine if the root cause
lies in APR or my code.
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 20:36 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I expect to have a similar discussion about request bodies once URIs are
resolved where I have essentially the same view - a decoding error
should lead to a request failure.
Thoughts?
It may not be useful. UTF-8 is THE most used
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 05:19 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/2/8 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
Hi!
FYI, there are a lot of checkstyle errors in o.a.c.storeconfig package,
a) tabs in server-registry.xml
b) a lot of trailing whitespace
Fixed.
Thanks !
Further
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:24 +, kfuj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Feb 8 08:24:36 2013
New Revision: 1443872
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1443872
Log:
Don't use a hard-coded domain name.
Actually, I'm not sure this is a good plan. This was most certainly
hardcoded on
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 21:19 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/2/8 kfuj...@apache.org:
Author: kfujino
Date: Fri Feb 8 08:50:24 2013
New Revision: 1443891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1443891
Log:
Improve ContextSF description.
Remove unused attributes engineName and
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 19:27 +0900, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
Hi.
I do not understand about StoreConfig well, but I have a question.
As long as I read the code (r1442161), I think that storeconfig() seem
to trigger a redeployment of Web applications.
For example, new context.xml will be
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
One issue I'm wondering about is the build system. After all that time,
I've starting using Maven instead of Ant (unbelievable, I know ...), and
while I am fine continuing using existing Ant build systems, I find
adding ones to newer
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 12:33 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.01.2013 17:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Version 1.1.26 is bug fixing release.
The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
and the build was done using tag [2].
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 18:55 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/01/2013 16:44, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I have ported a refactoring of character encoding (and decoding) to
trunk, using NIO rather than the creative hacks that are used. It makes
the IO nice and symmetrical, but I haven't
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 09:19 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jan 22 09:19:26 2013
New Revision: 1436814
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1436814view=rev
Log:
Add license
tabs - spaces
remove trailing whitespace
Thanks for all the beautifying.
Rémy
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:52 +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
mod_rewrite is definitvly HTTPd Swiss Knife and having it in Tomcat is
definitivly a good news.
This valve is for Tomcat 8 and higher or could it be used with Tomcat 7 ?
It will probably not build as is but as with almost everything, it
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 07:50 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/15/2013 02:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
3. Currently, we have no record of which Poller a socket is registered
with. This makes 2) more expensive as we have to iterate through the
Pollers to find the socket. Tracking the
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 09:35 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
That would be really nice. What I'd need is this:
int removeFromPollset(long socket)
where the return value is either -ve for an error code or +ve for the
current flags.
Looking at the code, by the time I have finished the other
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 11:43 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Using multiple pollsets is only needed on some platforms (Windows ...),
and it is possible it is not supposed to be mandatory now (Windows
should be able to handle large pollsets now). So if you accept to drop
support for running
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 12:08 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
It is not really a bug: only the newer Windows (Vista+) have efficient
polling. With previous versions, small pollsets have to be used because
(apparently) it can only poll over 64 sockets at a time. If the size is
over 1000, there is a
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 15:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
This is untested (I don't have an OSX build of the native lib handy right
now). I'll test later today.
I'm not sure native on OS X is 100% stable, for whatever reason (due to
apparent concurrency issues with the poller once read +
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 13:29 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
I think I am going to need to refactor the APR Poller code. Before I get
to far down that road I wanted to get a sanity check from those that
understand the APR/native connector better than I do.
The main problem:
- I need to be
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I had to solve each of these issues in the web container of JBoss.
Although this is not going to be quite 100% compatible with Tomcat, it
is very similar.
I recommend looking at the branch that is in AS 7 trunk:
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 18:34 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
I only had a look at the code and didn't play with it yet. I'm
positively impressed how complete w.r.t. mod_rewrite compatibility it
looks and personally I think it is nice and useful.
Thanks !
One question that came to my mind and which
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:16 -0500, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I haven't looked at the code but my first reaction was why not use
url-rewrite? When you say that it can re-start request processing, you
mean that you can essentially perform internal rewrites/forwards/etc.
without having to use
Hi,
I ported a valve providing mod_rewrite functionality (most of it) for
Tomcat 8, and committed it in the sandbox. This could be easily placed
in the main repository, where it would provide an additional item in the
new features department for this major release.
I have a documentation page
Hi,
I would be willing to start maintaining again storeconfig, along with
Jean-Frédéric. So after a hiatus, we would be able to bring back this
functionality which allows tweaking the configuration (through JMX in
particular) and then saving it to server.xml and context.xml files to
make changes
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:26 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposal would be to move storeconfig7/trunk from the sandbox to
modules/storeconfig in the Tomcat 7 branch [a port to trunk, aka
Tomcat 8, would be coming shortly, since I believe its container API
would now start to be more
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 10:52 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.36/
According to the release process, the 6.0.36 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_36 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X]
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:19 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
If we do go this route I'd like to change the scheme from jndi:// to
tomcat://. This is for several reasons:
- I believe there was a complaint that jndi:// clashed with another
component.
- It makes clear the old and the new are very
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:34 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
One use for a resource API is if it provides different backends - like
Hadoop filesystem abstraction
does. Than you could serve from hdfs/db/etc, and someone could use the same
api in deploy tools
or general programs.
One of the
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be only 4 threads
used with that test, which means decent sync performance.
Although with NIO the executor count can remain lower
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 16:59 -0600, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
I posted some feedback to the expert group:
http://java.net/projects/servlet-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-06/message/15
You can find all the discussions about the API in the archive, which
hopefully explain nearly all of
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 13:54 -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
Some initial patch for SPDY - using the NPN SSL extension, as required by
chrome/firefox.
I used github so it's easy to add comments or test:
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/commit/e97def3314216c083cc4b68ad9731e5a94b2af28
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:28 +, Pid wrote:
Of course, I'm even less sure about websockets since it's kind of a mess.
I'd say it was the other way round. WebSockets finalised before Xmas,
and there's lots of interest from various communities to judge from the BZ.
Websocrap is a bad
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 07:22 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jun 28 07:22:28 2011
New Revision: 1140463
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140463view=rev
Log:
Fix the remaining instances of new String(byte[] b, String enc) that can be
fixed
It is possible this
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:21 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jun 5 10:21:25 2011
New Revision: 1132367
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1132367view=rev
Log:
Correctly handle range requests when using sendfile and the APR/native HTTP
connector.
-
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:15 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Doh. Got it. We do need to modify the length to handle range requests,
but not like that.
What's the issue exactly ? When actually sending data, pos is set to
start and the length is used as the usual end - pos.
Rémy
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 22:25 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Apr 16 22:25:28 2011
New Revision: 1094069
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1094069view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51042
Don't trigger session creation listeners
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 20:37 +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X]
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:34 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 20 18:34:18 2011
New Revision: 1061442
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1061442view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50620
Exceptions calling session.endAccess should
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:18 +0300, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
We indeed do not have our own classes that implement InstanceListener,
but if you search for o.a.c.InstanceEvent, it is used in a plenty of places
(to implement this feature actually).
So it is not just throwing away classes, it
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 16:33 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I wouldn't call it bad. It doesn't do any harm (apart from adding a very
small amount of overhead), and it would help if the random source
selected ended up not being that random.
I thought the trade-off of protection against bad choices
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 19:59 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Nov 18 19:59:11 2010
New Revision: 1036595
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036595view=rev
Log:
Fix expiration statistics broken by r1036281
Add session creation and expiration rate statistics based
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
So we have two queues that can essentially grow up
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:13 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1035699view=rev
Log:
Session manager performance
Narrow sync - few % improvement
- * 1 thread - 2,422ms
- * 2 threads - 5,047ms
- * 4 threads - 13,188ms
- * 16 threads -
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:31 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
We might be able to avoid that be limiting the version to just integers.
I think that is reasonable but would like to hear some feedback from others.
That does raise the issue of whether to convert the provided version to
a (zero padded)
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:26 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.11.2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'll up that to -1, with another concern I've just thought about: if
using a session id path which includes more than one webapp, the version
numbers will have problems matching between the two
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 22:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Yes, this is stupid but it is what the spec requires.
I have to disagree, there was agreement in the expert group that
wildcard mappings and welcome files cannot be mixed at the moment,
unless for specific proprietary hacks, or if a static
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 07:57 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
I remember many years back I was arguing in favor of DirContext - pro
arguments were
it's a standard, bundled in JDK, probably more target implementations will
be available, etc.
I think Remy was arguing that it's too complex and not
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 08:43 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
But I hope you agree you were right, at least in the long term :-)
Who cares about the long term, nobody uses 10 years old code. Oh,
wait ;)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:44 +1300, Tim Whittington wrote:
I can have a look at this.
Is there a preferred way of making this configurable?
Given the caches are static, it's either going to be system property,
or changing to using an instance cache retained somewhere appropriate
(at the moment
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:31 -0700, Mark Thomas wrote:
I agree the spec isn't crystal clear.
I took the use of the word partial to refer to requests and URIs in
the welcome file to mean that the complete request was the result of
adding the welcome file. With that in mind, it seems natural
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:15 +0200, Wesley Acheson wrote:
So to get this straight Rémy you think it should be a WONT FIX too?
For the actual resolution, you have to talk with Mark.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:26 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
You need to be able to quote the section of the spec that demonstrates
it is wrong. Having quickly scanned the 2.5 and 3.0 specs I think you
are going to find that there is no clear definition of whether filters
are processed before or
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:02 +, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Aug 24 07:02:44 2010
New Revision: 988409
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988409view=rev
Log:
Make 1.4.x mandatory at build time as well
This requirement is not possible, even F13 is still at 1.3.9.
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:23 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
This is for trunk (tcnative 1.2.x)
Branch 1.1.x will have apr-1.3.x dependency with those
functions backported after found stable.
Pool pre cleanup is easily backportable and is
already part of RHEL-5 apr-1.2.7, so I added extra
check for
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:30 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
Work in progress ...
Will be used in new Poll.interrupt API so we can remove all
that clumsy pollTime/maintainTime logic for adding new sockets
to the pollset.
It should lower the accept latency, remove the need for
socket add queue and
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:56 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Well the accept is done in a different thread anyway. Additionally with
defer accept we won't see any changes accept latency.
Indeed, no change. But Windows is different enough that it would need
significantly different code to be
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 15:05 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
This appears to fix the crashes on my Mac. Need to test on Windows as
well since that is where I first saw the issue.
I confess to not understanding why this works, just that it appears to
do the job.
Assuming it really does something,
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:11 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 14 22:11:30 2010
New Revision: 964219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964219view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48998
Add the ExpiresFilter, a port of mod_expires
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 19:33 -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -1 (vote, not veto) on having validate be a dependency for compile.
I'm pretty sure Costin will never ever be able to contribute a single
line of code with that check in place :P
Rémy
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 11:18 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
IMHO for any serious application of async the developer will need to
adjust the timeout.
I am responsible for the fact that setting the timeout is separate, as I
did not understand how it was meaningful in most cases to have it be
anything
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 21:36 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
I take it that this means you think there is room for simplification.
I'm still trying to get my head around the Async implementation so if
you have any pointers on how it could be simplified, they would be much
appreciated.
Ok, so for
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:02 +0200, Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hi,
after the discussion about code style
(http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/2c7lkzmpcuxqpgjj
), I think that we must vote for this fix:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
It includes a starting point for a
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:28 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/04/2010 11:02, Óscar Frías Barranco wrote:
What do you think ?
Seems reasonable but I'd like to hear from some of the other committers
before making any changes.
If the change is made, it needs to be made for all connectors, not
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 11:05 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
2. Since it calls dispatch() before it calls request.setAttribute, it
ends up in a loop
For 1), unless the Servlet does startAsync again in the dispatch, it is
complete, even if the servlet does not call complete.
For 2), this
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:35 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 10 17:35:43 2010
New Revision: 921464
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921464view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
If compilation fails, always try to
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 09:19 +, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 09:19:45 2010
New Revision: 917931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917931view=rev
Log:
With unsafe reneg, minimum required is 1.2.21 caused by API change
As long as you don't set the new flag
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 11:36 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have some rough code that implements this scheme. I am in the process
of integrating it into Jasper for trunk. I can see this taking little
while to iron out the wrinkles before I'll be ready t propose a
back-port for 6.0.x. I don't think
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 21:51 +, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Dec 21 21:51:29 2009
New Revision: 893001
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893001view=rev
Log:
Fix second part of Comment 8 in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47413#c8
Coerce
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:18 +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Rémy
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:03 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote:
I've done some more digging and I think I have found what was causing this.
I'll
have a fix for trunk shortly and (after some testing) I'll re-propose.
No, what I meant is that, if you want to go the strict route and use '/'
as a separator
Hi,
I think cookies are still broken, and this is getting more and more
complex. The apparent issue is that the parser applies v1 parsing rules
when parsing v0 cookies (which are generated using a much more lenient
character exclusion), resulting in cookies that cannot be parsed back.
A simple
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 16:45 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote:
I really do loath cookies right now. I've pulled the proposed patches for
5.5.x
and 6.0.x until I (or someone else) can take a look at this.
I do too. v0 cookies is 15 years old stuff that Netscape hacked out of
thin air without thinking
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:46 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Nov 2 18:46:21 2009
New Revision: 832039
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=832039view=rev
Log:
StringBuffer - StringBuilder for o.a.naming
So I did not test or anything, but is SBuilder faster than
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 12:59 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Oct 31 12:59:51 2009
New Revision: 831536
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=831536view=rev
Log:
Add an explicit configuration option for cookie version switching and update
test cases and docs to
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:55 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Rémy
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:57 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 21 20:57:14 2009
New Revision: 828212
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=828212view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47987
Limit size of not found resources cache
I
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.20 stable. This release includes many bugfixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.18.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 13:22 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote:
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released?
If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/?
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Ok, so with one exception, all voted stable
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 17:02 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I do not see any issues with the release, except the one
of the tgz sources archive.
Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following:
The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip
archive are
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 10:49 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
// Acquire global JNDI resources if available
-Server server = ServerFactory.getServer();
+Server server =
+
((Engine)context.getParent().getParent()).getService().getServer();
Ouch, not pretty.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:42 +1000, mcto...@gmail.com wrote:
In a nutshell, we discovered that under Windows, the maximum size of the
I think with Windows, APR will have scalability problems sooner or
later, as poller performance is bad on that platform (the code has a
hack to use many pollers
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 08:50 +1000, mcto...@gmail.com wrote:
A few followups on this. It's only now that I have realised that the
the tomcat apr handler in JBoss is subtly different from the one in
Tomcatie that whole piece of tomcat has been forked into JBossWeb,
and they're starting
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. The request is already read and buffered.
We 'just' need to renegotiation to require an SSL cert.
I'll try and take a look at this but I'll probably need some help with
the C code. First step will be to get
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:09 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
Having now read Roy's comment on 39727 I'm leaning towards reverting
this patch and seeing what is possible following the Transfer-Encoding
route. I'll sleep on it in case a better idea occurs to me and come back
to this tomorrow.
If you
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 17:13 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 14 17:13:16 2009
New Revision: 764884
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=764884view=rev
Log:
Add a TODO to review the synchronisation around background processing
Ok, so I get two more email messages
1 - 100 of 1007 matches
Mail list logo
