Le 5/10/2016 à 16:25, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> Also, there's an issue with the Java 9 constant that is used in Tomcat,
> CompilerOptions.VERSION_1_9 -> CompilerOptions.VERSION_9. This creates a
> compatibility problem where the new vs old build cannot be drop in
> replacements.
The
2016-10-04 19:41 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>:
> Le 4/10/2016 à 19:19, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
>
> > Does anyone have info on Java 9 support in ECJ ? This is going to be
> needed
> > for JSP support (obviously). I tested 4.7Ms [good news: it's a drop
2016-10-04 20:41 GMT+03:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>:
>
> Le 4/10/2016 à 19:19, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
>
> > Does anyone have info on Java 9 support in ECJ ? This is going to be
needed
> > for JSP support (obviously). I tested 4.7Ms [good news: it's a drop
Le 4/10/2016 à 19:19, Rémy Maucherat a écrit :
> Does anyone have info on Java 9 support in ECJ ? This is going to be needed
> for JSP support (obviously). I tested 4.7Ms [good news: it's a drop in
> replacement for our current 4.5] but there's no change in that area.
There is a Java
Hi,
Does anyone have info on Java 9 support in ECJ ? This is going to be needed
for JSP support (obviously). I tested 4.7Ms [good news: it's a drop in
replacement for our current 4.5] but there's no change in that area.
Rémy
