Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/09/2016 16:29, Jarosław Górny wrote: > Hi, > > > 2016-09-19 16:10 GMT+02:00 Coty Sutherland : >> OK, I've read over what I proposed again and it looks correct to me. I >> only made one change after you provided further explanation and that >> change was to add

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-19 Thread Jarosław Górny
Hi, 2016-09-19 16:10 GMT+02:00 Coty Sutherland : > OK, I've read over what I proposed again and it looks correct to me. I > only made one change after you provided further explanation and that > change was to add 'finalized' in the Alpha release description: > >

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-19 Thread Coty Sutherland
OK, I've read over what I proposed again and it looks correct to me. I only made one change after you provided further explanation and that change was to add 'finalized' in the Alpha release description: +functionality required by the finalised specification and/or significant bugs I did this to

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-17 Thread Jarosław Górny
2016-09-16 15:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass >> at a patch to update the page. I'm not sure I have a solid grasp on >> why we're doing milestones in tc9 (other than

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-16 Thread Coty Sutherland
Ahh. That makes a lot more sense; thanks. I'll amend my patch and attach it again in a bit. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass >> at a patch

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote: > I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass > at a patch to update the page. I'm not sure I have a solid grasp on > why we're doing milestones in tc9 (other than to prevent a bunch of > revisions from being releases pre-beta)

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 15/09/2016 17:26, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 15 September 2016 16:32:36 BST, Coty Sutherland > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the >> versioning scheme for tomcat 9. I looked at the >>

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-16 Thread Coty Sutherland
I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass at a patch to update the page. I'm not sure I have a solid grasp on why we're doing milestones in tc9 (other than to prevent a bunch of revisions from being releases pre-beta) so this might need some changes to convey the

Re: Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 15 September 2016 16:32:36 BST, Coty Sutherland wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the >versioning scheme for tomcat 9. I looked at the >http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html page and it has some good >information there,

Should we update version scheme information for tomcat 9?

2016-09-15 Thread Coty Sutherland
Hi all, I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the versioning scheme for tomcat 9. I looked at the http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html page and it has some good information there, but it doesn't mention what the milestone releases are or how they fit into the