Hi Mathias,
On Wednesday 30 of April 2008, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Well, my _only_ motivation for the split are the build dependencies - so
if we end up with 20 (sub)packages, or 15, I don't really care :-) Also,
the names are not that big deal for me (though I personally prefer better
Caolan McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 20:25 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Another advantage is that it is also easy for the potential
contributors to install just the
-devel packages of the dependencies, and start with the development in
the package where he/she wants to fix something
Hi Kay,
Apparently I missed your mail - sorry for that :-(
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 15:35, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
just wanted to suggest that re-using one or the other already existing
structure for package re-organization would have some benefits. Possible
candidates
Hi Jan,
just wanted to suggest that re-using one or the other already existing
structure for package re-organization would have some benefits. Possible
candidates IMHO are:
-1- projects
-2- modules
You more or less already ruled out the modules approach, arguing along
the line, that it
Hi Mathias,
On Monday 15 October 2007 17:45, Mathias Bauer wrote:
The advantage of one single 3rdparty package is that you either can
use it as a make yourself happy with one click package or you don't
use it at all and use each library as part of the already available 3rd
party packages
Hi mathias
The point is that people want to get rid of the whole process. That
doesn't mean that we won't be able to build everything in one step but
that shouldn't be the only way to build something that is part of the
OOo code base.
Thanks for your development
laurent
--
Laurent Godard
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Friday 12 October 2007 20:18, Mathias Bauer wrote:
just stumbled about that the report design extension is built during the
regular build process, wouldn't it be better at all to create a source
tarball include jfreereport and reportdesign modules. Where
Martin Hollmichel schrieb:
Hi,
just stumbled about that the report design extension is built during the
regular build process, wouldn't it be better at all to create a source
tarball include jfreereport and reportdesign modules. Where we already
achieved modularization in the sources we
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Eg. the spellchecker (hunspell) itself is in the lingucomponent which I
propose to put to ooo-apps-extensions (and thus to ship it together with the
application). The dictionaries for it are in ooo-libs-3rdparty/dictionaries
- the distros have their own packages, but it
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Rüdiger Timm wrote:
Personally, I do not like spitting up sources at all. But that's my very
personal opinion.
Splitting up source definitely is a good idea. Maybe not for people
building everything anyway but it would be a huge step ahead for the
casual developer like
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 09:05 +0200, Rüdiger Timm wrote:
My feeling is we should first do some work on our code base so that be
really can benefit from a split.
Perhaps a good case study of such a split is the modular X effort which
broke the monolithic x.org build into separately buildable
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Ruediger,
I am sorry, I missed a part of the mail when I was answering previously :-(
No problem.
On Monday 08 October 2007 17:36, Rüdiger Timm wrote:
This would tremendously decrease the learning curve for the new
developers as well. Imagine someone who wants
Rüdiger Timm wrote:
Personally, I do not like spitting up sources at all. But that's my very
personal opinion.
Splitting up source definitely is a good idea. Maybe not for people
building everything anyway but it would be a huge step ahead for the
casual developer like volunteers, distro
Hi,
During the OOoCon, Petr had a presentation about the OOo package splitting.
The most important part for a (Linux) package maintainer was to be able to
build parts of OpenOffice.org separately; the thing is that with all the
localizations, we are unable to get the build times under some 7
Hi Ruediger,
On Monday 08 October 2007 17:36, Rüdiger Timm wrote:
During the OOoCon, Petr had a presentation about the OOo package
splitting. The most important part for a (Linux) package maintainer was
to be able to build parts of OpenOffice.org separately; the thing is that
with all
15 matches
Mail list logo
