On 22/05/2013 17:35, Luciano Resende wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted and the Board has confirmed Jean-Sebastien
Delfino as the new Tuscany PMC Chair.
Congratulations !!!
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129641#comment-13129641
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3962:
---
The interface does contain overloaded
On 14/09/2011 01:10, Greg Dritschler wrote:
These questions have come up before, and in the past we've looked at the Common
Annotations for the
Java Platform specification (aka JSR 250) for guidance. The rules being
proposed here appear to be
in opposition to one of those guidelines:
(page
On 15/09/2011 22:59, Jennifer A Thompson (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jennifer A Thompson updated TUSCANY-3947:
-
Description:
In
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SCA Java Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3
tuscany-node-manager has a series of dependencies on the javax.ws.rs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-3944.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved by adding an import declaration for javax.ws.rs package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100115#comment-13100115
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3942:
---
Folks,
For OASIS, this is illegal, pure
On 25/08/2011 18:03, Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:49 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking to fix TUSCANY-3931 about the clients not working with the
wsdl in the domain registry for async services and i wonder what the
wsdl should really look like. For example with the
On 25/08/2011 20:53, Greg Dritschler wrote:
I agree that the DomainRegistry should have the equivalent synchronous version.
While we're on this subject, I happened to be wondering today whether
@AsyncInvocation obligates the
service implementation to use the async service interface? Obviously
On 23/08/2011 23:23, Simon Nash wrote:
This sounds like the right approach. One small point is that the description
talks about redeclaring fields and methods in the subclass. This is possible
with methods, but it doesn't work for fields as this results in a separate field
with the same name in
Folks,
Commenting on this JIRA:
On 19/08/2011 01:32, Vijai Kalathur (JIRA) wrote:
Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties
snip
In the scenario where the Service impl class extends a class which has no SCA
annotations in it, protected fields in the base class are
On 09/08/2011 23:33, Greg Dritschler wrote:
New question: What is the scope for resolving a COMPOSITE reference target?
It seems like it is
resolved in the context of the using composite.
I recall seeing something about this somewhere but all I can find is this:
On 08/08/2011 14:56, Greg Dritschler wrote:
I have the following test case:
Composite A:
- is deployable
- has a component reference with a reference target pointing to some
top-level component outside of A
- does not promote the component reference
Composite B:
- is deployable
-
Greg,
I'll try to address this with some inline replies, but I get the feeling that maybe a conf call will
be needed to interactively work on your concerns.
Yours, Mike.
On 05/08/2011 16:12, Greg Dritschler wrote:
Simon,
You seem to be saying there's an equivalence between binding.sca
On 04/08/2011 10:27, Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the following composites:
Composite A has a component reference myService with binding.sca uri=X.
The reference is promoted.
Composite B has a component that uses A
On 04/08/2011 14:27, Greg Dritschler wrote:
From the assembly spec on component references:
900 binding : Binding (0..n) - A reference element has zero or more binding
elements as children. If no
901 binding elements are specified for the reference, then the bindings
specified for the
Folks,
Simple answer to Scott's questions:
On 26/07/2011 16:08, Scott Kurz wrote:
Trying to understand myself as the spec doesn't seem crystal clear...
I assume we'd agree also that the answer should be the same for this variation:
composite B with component C2
service name=S1Promoted
On 30/07/2011 20:02, Eranda Sooriyabandara wrote:
Hi Raymond,
Can you model them as SCA properties? We support constructor based
injection.
Is there a example code which explain how to use it? Or can you explain a bit
how can to do it.
thanks
Eranda
Eranda,
The OASIS SCA Java CAA spec
On 19/07/2011 11:26, ant elder wrote:
Ok following the discussion last week about doing a beta3 release i've
created a release branch and built the distros from that which are
presently uploading to:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-review/
I've done a little clean up and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13068847#comment-13068847
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3893:
---
The Policy test suite at OASIS has been
Folks,
An OASIS Java TC issue has been raised for these problems:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-243
along with the proposed updates, which can be seen in Section B.1.3 of this
updated spec:
Folks,
An OASIS Java TC issue has been raised for these problems:
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-243
along with the proposed updates, which can be seen in Section B.1.3 of this
updated spec:
PS Next I think we should look at context information being passed from the
application code to the
code involved in a reference invocation...
Folks,
OK, time to delve into this piece of function.
The basic capability of both ComponentContext and RequestContext is to supply information to
On 15/07/2011 12:08, Simon Laws wrote:
Commenting on the last two posts. Generally I prefer the strong typing
of context and the ability to have that type injected into an
implementation. I do though accept that there is no API alternative to
injection for anything other than RequestContext or
Raymond,
Can you explain why you prefer strobgly types context extensions?
Why is this JAX-RS mechanism a good thing?
Can you paint a picture of what this would look like:
a) for the application components
b) for the runtime/binding components
Yours, Mike.
On 15/07/2011 17:35, Raymond
On 13/07/2011 22:48, ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Mike Edwards
mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011 21:44, Raymond Feng wrote:
Don't we prefer to use a JAX-WS based implementation as the default
binding-ws-runtime?
Thanks,
Raymond
On 13/07/2011 16:37, Simon Laws wrote:
Yes, it's a shame we don't pass round a TuscanyContext rather than the
ExtensionPointRegistry when we configure extension factories. We could
look to do that but that's possibly a little orthogonal to how we pass
context along the invocation chain. Although
On 12/07/2011 21:44, Raymond Feng wrote:
Don't we prefer to use a JAX-WS based implementation as the default
binding-ws-runtime?
Thanks,
Raymond
/
Folks,
No problem with the renaming - but as for preferring the JAX-WS impl, I
Folks,
I understand that there are some problems with the standard OASIS Java Client API that are affecting
Tuscany.
I'd be grateful if people who know about these problems could list the problems and the proposed
fixes - there is a short window of opportunity to get the OASIS code updated,
Folks,
I'd like to see us do a full 2.x release - not another Beta.
2.x has been around for a while and it's in pretty good shape. A full release is called for in my
opinion. If some samples aren't of the right quality, then leave them out for now - they can be
added back later once they
Nirmal,
I did an Update followed by a full build this morning and I don't see this error - the build works
fine for me, with only a couple of known test failures relating to some Policy function that is
under development.
Yours, Mike.
On 02/07/2011 08:35, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
Hi,
FYI:
On 04/07/2011 14:31, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
Did I make a mistake by running mvn compile before mvn install?
I tried to run mvn install, it ran out of java heap memory. :(
Nirmal,
You need to adjust the Maven OPTS for the Java heap size, as described here:
Nirmal,
On my machine, that testcase works fine for me - I do not see the error that
you see.
My local copy was updated ~3 hours ago and I am not missing any recent changes relating to that
testcase.
I am running on Windows XP.
Yours, Mike.
On 04/07/2011 16:00, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
Ant,
The lack of documentation is the reason I will not vote in favour of this.
Having done releases without documentation before is no justification in my opinion. How is anyone
supposed to learn how to use something if there is no documentation?
I'll be happy to help create documentation,
Scott,
I think that it is best if you put the sources of the Contributions into some separate modules that
are built separately to create Contribution ZIPs that are then used as dependencies by the tests.
This is effectively what we do in the OASIS testcases, where there are loads of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050964#comment-13050964
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3877:
---
I think that the key material
Ant,
Why is this famed README not in either of the jar files:
tuscany-zip-plugin-alpha3.jar
tuscany-zip-plugin-alpha3-sources.jar
Yours, Mike.
On 17/06/2011 11:32, ant elder wrote:
The most comprehensive doc is in the README file, IIRC thats mostly
written by your good self Mike.
On 04/03/2011 13:46, Simon Nash wrote:
Who is planning to attend this meeting?
Simon
Folks,
Sorry, but a couple of customer related meetings mean that I shall not be able to make the London
meetup.
Yours, Mike.
On 28/02/2011 09:58, ant elder wrote:
snip
It might be worth looking at what the binary distribution is actually
for though, perhaps not in this thread so it doesn't bog down the
sample discussion. The binary distribution isn't used by any of the
Maven builds of the samples or running them.
On 24/02/2011 14:28, Florian Moga wrote:
I was thinking that if we use blogging as the primary way of describing
samples, it's not even
necessary to include a README in each and every sample, people can just search
the blog knowing that
information will be there (I'm trying to keep things as
Folks,
Comments inline...
On 28/02/2011 11:40, Simon Laws wrote:
I was initially assuming that we would retain a way for users to
(re-)compile sample contributions from the source provided in the
binary distribution. The complicating factor in these conversations
seems to be Maven as it leads
On 23/02/2011 13:13, ant elder wrote:
The current Tuscanyimplementation.spring code is still using the
old OSOA namespace for the sca extensions to the Spring context files.
As FYI I plan to update that shortly in trunk, which does mean any
existing sca spring applications would need updating
On 14/02/2011 09:11, ant elder wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Florian Mogamoga@gmail.com wrote:
Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/
The release tag is at:
Folks,
What is the status of these 3 modules in 2.x please?
It looks like their contents have been merged into other modules - shouldn't
these modules be deleted?
Yours, Mike.
On 14/02/2011 10:29, ant elder wrote:
Ok it sounds like this is going to happen on the 7th, where shall we
do it? If there are no other suggestions I could try to see if there
are any rooms available at IBM Southbank.
...ant
Ant,
You may well find Southbank difficult at the moment as
On 10/02/2011 12:15, Simon Laws wrote:
I'd like to move the SCABindingMapper interface from
binding-sca-runtime / org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.provider
to somewhere like.
core-spi / org.apache.tuscany.sca.provider
So that people wanting to implement a default binding mapper don't
have
On 07/02/2011 10:56, Florian Moga wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com
mailto:simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
So when you do a full build the build always hangs?
Yes.
Is that test still in the build as I don't experience that.
Yes.
What
On 09/02/2011 10:56, Simon Nash wrote:
On interesting idea (taking up the theme of @RequiresPassByValue) would
to require @AllowsPassByReference to always be present (specifying true
or false) on every service method and every reference. That would
force developers to think about the issue and
On 08/02/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I can see that relaxing the current spec restrictiveness would be
difficult as things would break in some circumstances, but it does
seem like there will be situations when the
On 08/02/2011 11:17, Simon Nash wrote:
I'm very dubious about the wisdom of this. I bear the scars from a
previous life of a situation where a flag was added to an enterprise
application server (which shall remain nameless) to override the PBV
semantics required by the architecture in the
On 08/02/2011 14:12, Simon Nash wrote:
Actually in its first incarnation the force PBR override setting was a
global flag that applied to the whole runtime, was set on by default,
and was poorly documented. (Hard to believe, I know.) After some
lobbying from myself the default was changed to off
On 05/02/2011 09:51, Florian MOGA wrote:
Thank you for the information Ant. I was wondering more about the checks each
developer is doing
before voting a +1. I'd like to choose a set of checks to perform myself when a
vote is called but I
can't think of tests other than the ones that I stated
On 07/02/2011 12:05, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Simon Nashn...@apache.org wrote:
snip
I think we're in violent agreement here! Let's pick a small and
useful set of high-quality samples to include in the release, then
make sure (by automated tests as far as possible)
On 04/02/2011 15:47, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Florian MOGAmoga@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to volunteer at QCon London next month in order to be able to
attend the sessions and tutorials. The conference and tutorials take place
between 7-11 March. It would be
On 07/02/2011 15:09, Simon Laws wrote:
An idle question somewhat motivated by recently touching on the sample
docs in another ML thread.
Are we going to convert from Confluence to CMS [1]?
If we are eventually going to have to do this (when the autoexport
stops working?) we should probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards closed TUSCANY-3817.
-
Tuscany fails OASIS Java CAA Testcases 10029 10030
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards closed TUSCANY-3816.
-
iTest Callback SeparateThread violates the OASIS rules for COMPOSITE scope
components
Extension
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.x
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
Tuscany fails testcase BWS_2016.
Basically, this test has a binding.ws element with a non-existent WSDL file
referenced via a wsdli attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990080#comment-12990080
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3831:
---
The problem arises from
On 02/02/2011 18:30, ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Mike Edwards
mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2011 09:04, ant elder wrote:
I'll guess that Raymond will want to get the pass-by-reference
improvements into this release so what ever happens we'll need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards closed TUSCANY-3829.
-
Test Failure whe building trunk - iTest WS Launcher Axis2 testscases all fail
On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC2/
The release tag is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC2
Here's my +1
On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC2/
The release tag is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC2
Here's my +1
On 01/02/2011 13:12, Florian MOGA wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on multiple response support for the comet binding. I
have an initial
implementation but I'm using the thread context to store some internal state
between forward and
callback calls and this leads to some limitations. So I was
On 01/02/2011 13:55, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mike Edwards
mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany
On 01/02/2011 22:43, Luciano Resende wrote:
This always assume PBV, which will cause extra and unnecessary
transformation and degrade performance. Instead of hacking the core
runtime, we should really look into the root cause of the issue and
fix it. I'd rather really disable the conformance
On 01/02/2011 22:53, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I would rather that we ignore the failing test cases with JIRA
tickets so that we won't forget to fix it.
Raymond,
On that point, at this stage, I totally disagree.
Fix the function so that it passes the tests BEFORE putting it back in.
I will be
On 30/01/2011 10:08, ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on RC2 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC2/
The release tag is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC2
Here's my +1
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany as a subject system in my research,
I
On 26/01/2011 10:23, Mike Edwards wrote:
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany
On 24/01/2011 18:13, César Couto wrote:
Dear developers,
I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am
making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the
FindBugs bug finding tool.
Since I am planning to use Tuscany as a subject system in my research,
I
On 23/01/2011 23:56, ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on RC1 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release.
The artifacts are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC1/
The release tag is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta2-RC1
Here's my +1
On 25/01/2011 17:38, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:33 AM, dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
I would say TDD and static code analysis are complementary.
Cheers
Daniel
Agree, I have been playing with Sonar, which provides various metrics
and below you can find
On 22/01/2011 14:25, ant elder wrote:
The problem with doing that is that now the OASIS repo is also checked
for every artifact when building online which could add significantly
to the total build time.
Looking at the current repository definitions i think most of those
are old historical
On 20/01/2011 21:17, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Scott Kurzscottk...@gmail.com wrote:
I recreated that MediatorImpl.copyInput failure now... Maybe the
problem was that earlier I ran offline and had something stale in my
mvn repo???
Anyway..looking into both problems
On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurzscottk...@gmail.com wrote:
I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
It made the copyInput IndexOutOfBoundsException in
sample-implementation-extension go away... (will give some more
thought to whether
On 21/01/2011 11:07, Mike Edwards wrote:
On 20/01/2011 23:29, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Scott Kurzscottk...@gmail.com wrote:
I just committed what I hope is a fix in r1061531.
It made the copyInput IndexOutOfBoundsException in
sample-implementation-extension go away
Folks,
I think that the recent work on Holder support has revealed something worth
discussing.
The OASIS specs define a specialized form of Java interface for service implementations that are
asynchronous - ie where the response may be delivered from a separate thread long after the request
On 21/01/2011 14:13, Scott Kurz wrote:
I saw that too and manually installed it after finding an earlier
thread on this ML (too lazy to link).
Got the JAR here:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-j/Release/org/oasis-open/sca/j/sca-caa-apis/1.1-CD04/sca-caa-apis-1.1-CD04.jar
-task
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12984277#action_12984277
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3821:
---
Perform this in 2 stages:
1) Enable Axis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12984281#action_12984281
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3821:
---
Stage 1 (including fixup of callback
On 20/01/2011 21:05, Scott Kurz wrote:
I see the problem in JavaInterfaceImpl.isAsyncServerOperation. The
output type will be an empty list in this case, so I can tweak the
check.
The issue with MediatorImpl concerns me more since I ran the same
tests and didn't notice that problem. One thing
On 19/01/2011 10:25, ant elder wrote:
I've renamed this to use
org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.TuscanyRuntime. I like that name and it
seems most appropriate. If that doesn't work for you in the DomainNode
module where would you like it - core/core-spi?
...ant
Ant,
It isn't the class name
On 19/01/2011 22:57, Yang, Gang CTR US USA wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi, Urso,
Thanks for the reply. Please excuse me for my ignorance (I just came over to 2.0), but
how do you select axis2 or jaxws at the first place? In 1.6, if you specify
binding.ws then axis2 used
Folks,
Can someone explain why there is now a split package org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime in the modules
domain-node and in core-spi, please?
It looks like this has come about due to changes in domain-node.
Split packages are at best confusing and to be avoided, in my opinion.
For OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12982633#action_12982633
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3811:
---
Updated deserialization code
: OASIS Compliance - TUSCANY
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
Tuscany fails OASIS Java CAA testcases 10029 10030, which concern detection
of @Remotable annotations in invalid locations within
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-3817.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix to JavaInterfaceIntrospectorImpl in interface-java provided
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-3816.
---
Resolution: Fixed
A basic fix to the test is committed in:
1058211
However, this test
/TUSCANY-3816
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Integration Tests
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
The iTest Callback SeparateThread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980033#action_12980033
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3816:
---
The initial step is to disable this test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980111#action_12980111
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3786:
---
Some separation of the Java code from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980113#action_12980113
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3801:
---
Further changes to core, core-spi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980115#action_12980115
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3811:
---
Upgraded support for local binding.sca
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3813
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: OASIS Compliance - TUSCANY
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
Priority: Minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-3813.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix to the ServiceProcessor class in implementation-java introspect.impl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978765#action_12978765
]
Mike Edwards edited comment on TUSCANY-3813 at 1/7/11 7:50 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973586#action_12973586
]
Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3807:
---
AsyncResponseInvoker made generic to deal
Reporter: Mike Edwards
Assignee: Mike Edwards
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
1 - 100 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
