Thilina Buddhika wrote:
Hi,
Yes, these modules are available. But earlier there was a web app under this
package which made use of these modules to provide with SCA domain admin
functionality. This was only working with a local SCA domain. So as I feel,
it would be good, if we can get this web
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
One of the steps for TLP migration is to add Tuscany to
http://www.apache.org. We need to have a title (hover text) for Tuscany.
What should we have?
What about A Distributed Composite Application Framework Implementing
SCA?
Looking at other projects, about 4
Simon Laws wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Let's step back and look at the use case first.
Here is a set of assumptions I have:
1) This is a standalone application and there is a deployable composite
file on the classpath
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to reactivate the discussion on how we can improve the
extensibility story based on the following use cases.
1) Be able to discover extensions
ant elder wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
b) A variety of functional components, that
ant elder wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
b) A variety of functional components, that
and what they
contain, was: SCA runtimes
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:43:02 +0100
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
ant elder (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12609501#action_12609501 ]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2445:
This looks like a great
in the Geronimo admin Console
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:31:31 +0100
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(cut)
Hi
I've noticed that a 1.4-SNAPSHOT version has crept into
/binding-ws-xml/pom.xm. I also don't see binding-ws-wsdlgen in
modules/pom.xml. This probably worked locally if you
understand
how the decision is made about whether or not to use WS-RM conversation.
If the current patch is applied, would WS-RM conversation be used
unconditionally? I don't think that would be acceptable.
Simon
Regards,
Yang
2008/7/1 Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sun Yang wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your comment and considering applying my patch. I am thinking
to do a refactoring after this discussion. So please give me a little
time before I make it better. Currently, I want to get the answers for
the following questions based on our discussion in this
haleh mahbod wrote:
Hi Ant,
when you refer to a user, do you mean an embedder or an application
developer?
I am looking at [1] link where the first draft of functional components
were defined. I am assuming it is the embedders.
Let's say I am an embedder wanting to use ejb. What are the
I'm working on some builder fixes to handle various promotion cases
correctly. I have a clean build out of my local copy with the
changes, and I'd like to get them in to the next 1.3 RC if possible.
I should be ready to check them in later today.
Simon
of time to review and regression test the changes, but the downside
is that I won't be able to do the commit until some time around midnight
UK time. I hope this doesn't cause too much of a problem.
Simon
...ant
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Luckily i started RC2 last night but then decided to finish it off
this morning so there's still time to get that in.
Thanks. I'm about to get on a plane so I won't have connectivity for the
check-in until I land at LAX later today. The long flight
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I did some investigation and it turned out it is not a trivial issue.
Recently we now move the Java2WSDL generation to the build phase.
When Tuscany is deployed as a web application, we don't know the HTTP
port number configured when the Tuscany
Scott Kurz wrote:
The root cause here seems to be the same or similar to the one in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2479
(not that pointing that out brings us closer to a solution).
I did also discover that externalizing every schema the way wsgen's WSDL
output does leads to
in tuscany.apache.org?
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:44 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with links to confluence Wiki and Website spaces
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I
but that it wasn't associated with 1.3 in JIRA. I think we need to
delay until tomorrow.
Simon
Hi ant
I'm done with these fixes now. We need to get the go ahead from others
who have been making fixes in 1.3, e.g. Simon Nash, but from my pov we
can go ahead with the respin. Are you
ant elder wrote:
Big +1 from me, i'd probably prefer the messages go to the commit list
but either would be an improvement.
We have clear evidence from the last few weeks that without these
timely public reminders of the status of the build, the trunk is in
a broken state far more often than
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Kurz wrote:
The root cause here seems to be the same or similar to the one in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2479
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just forced the TUSCANYWIKI autoexport to be rebuilt. The
exported content should be consistent with the WIKI now. Please
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just ran a build against the trunk and 1.3 tag and I don't see the
issue related to the binding-ws-axis2.
I already opened a JIRA for wsdlgen test failures:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498.
Does this problem only apply to the 1.3 tag? The
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just ran a build against the trunk and 1.3 tag and I don't see the
issue related to the binding-ws-axis2.
I already opened a JIRA for wsdlgen test failures:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498.
I updated trunk to r679881 and did a mvn clean and
--
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:13 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error building binding-ws-axis2
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just ran a build against the trunk and 1.3 tag and I don't see the
issue related
in the
system ID without the change that you just checked in?
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:13 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error building binding-ws-axis2
Raymond Feng wrote
that was breaking for you with the IBM JDK before you made your
change. However, it was working for me with the Sun JDK.
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:50 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
ant elder wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
The system id was set to namespace + a file name generated by
JAXB, such as schema3.xsd. In the failing test case, it was
http
ant elder wrote:
As we're sorting out the cwiki admins its reminded me of this, what is
the status of this and do we have any continuum admins in Tuscany able
to add committers to the Tuscany group?
As the notifications are going to start being sent to the mailing list
again i think we
I did a complete checkout and build from the latest trunk. The build
failed with the following error. Rerunning the build gave the same
error, so it's not a transient maven repo problem. Any ideas?
Simon
[INFO]
[INFO]
)
at com.google.gdata.client.Service.getEntry(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.gdata.provider.GdataBindingInvoker$Get
Invoker.invoke(GdataBindingInvoker.java:108)
... 38 more
Any suggestions for how to resolve this would be much appreciated.
Simon
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Simon Nash
a load of actual tests and that working out
what's failed is a pain. Why do we have to have a test like this,
which is
in fact a very large pile of subtests?
Yours, Mike.
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a complete checkout and build from the latest trunk. The build
failed with the following error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: antelder
Date: Tue Aug 5 03:44:07 2008
New Revision: 682663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682663view=rev
Log:
Update for latest jms binding code
Modified:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I propose that we move to SDO 1.1.1
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:33 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Re. JMS. I'm a little nervous about putting completely
ant elder wrote:
I don't think we should do this yet. We've only just put Node2 out in a
release and users have just started to move from the SCADomain APIs to
it so to turn around an immediately deprecate it doesn't give a very
good user experience, and one of our users has even replied to
ant elder wrote:
Can you look in the logs folder in the Tomcat install folder and there
should be one of the logs in there which gives more information about
what the problem was that caused the TuscanyServletFilter to fail to
start. If that log info isn't obvious post it back here and we can
this configuration ?
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Can we
get the address changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
haleh mahbod wrote:
Thank you both for the information that you provided. I'll move the
table that Raymond has into the wiki page as a starting point. Let's
work from one place.
Daniel, you raised a good point that I was not covering on the wiki page
and that is the mapping to bundles. I
Adriano Crestani wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted Oscar Castaneda as a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations Oscar and welcome on board!
Adriano Crestani
Thanks Oscar for your valuable contributions, and welcome!
Simon
One question inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
From: Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I see from the design (and also the module name :-) ) that this work
is Equinox-specific and will not work
Simon Laws wrote:
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.2 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC2/
http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/
This
Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I built the source distro without any problems.
I tried running a selection of samples from the binary distro.
Unfortunately I didn't get very far before hitting the first problem.
In samples/helloworld
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.2
release are now available, please review and vote
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Simon.
Best wishes and enjoy the wonderful life! I hope working on Tuscany is
part of the fun :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 9:01 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Mike Edwards wrote:
Ramkumar R wrote:
Hi All,
I came across this requirement, while working with Spring, but I
believe this topic also holds good for Java implementations.
Spring supports Constructor Injection by allowing to inject properties
and objects via the constructors. Not sure if
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, how about we make a step back and think on the sample scenario :
Considering a client application accessing a sca service using a web
service binding, if the
While running a test that launches the Tuscany runtime standalone
from a command line, I noticed that Tuscany always creates an empty
target subdirectory under the current directory. It isn't very
friendly to modify the user's environment in this way, and in some
cases (running from a read-only
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ram has definitely being doing most if not all the RM work for this
release, so +1 for Ram as Release Manager for 1.4
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Ramkumar R
Ramkumar R wrote:
Hi All,
A new branch for 1.4 is created under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.4
Wiki page used to track the 1.4 release info -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Release+-+Java+SCA+1.4
Also we have the above wiki page
When doing a full build of the 1.4 branch, I got a failure in
vtest/java-api/annotations. I reran the build on just this module,
and it succeeded. Any ideas?
Simon
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Apache Tuscany SCA vTest Java
Raymond Feng wrote:
I meant Extension. Some projects such as Axis2 and Woodstox use this
suffix for extended API/SPI.
Thanks,
Raymond
*From:* Simon Laws mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2008 8:44 AM
*To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org mailto:dev@tuscany.apache.org
*Subject:*
Dan Becker wrote:
Ramkumar R wrote:
The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.4 release are now
available, please review and vote to release.
The artifacts are available for at:
http://people.apache.org/~ramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC1/
This includes the signed binary, source distributions
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED
tomorrow and
go for a RC2, so that we will have some time to make a final review.
Here we have the list of pending issues that needs to be resolved before
tomorrow:
Ramkumar: To take care of TUSCANY-2712 , TUSCANY-2707 and TUSCANY-2726
Simon Nash: To pull in r723908 into the 1.4 branch
I marked the failing JMS itest with @Ignore to continue my
build of the 1.4 RC4 source distro. When building the vtest
directory, I got the following failure in the annotations
scope test. Has anyone else seen this?
Simon
Running
environment.
Simon
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
I did not see this error building on Windows
Yours, Mike.
ant elder wrote:
This is working ok for me, whats your environment? Has anyone else
seen this?
...ant
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n
, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 3.297 sec
Results :
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1
Anyways I will try again with the top-down build to see if there are any
issues.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n...@apache.org wrote
Simon Nash wrote:
I rebooted and tried the vtest build again. This time it ran
to completion with no problems. It seems that something in my
environment was interfering with the build. I'm now running
a complete top-level build to see what happens.
This has completed successfully, so my
Kevan Miller wrote:
I wanted to let everyone know that Luciano Resende is a new Member of
the Apache Software Foundation. At the the December ASF Members meeting,
in recognition of his contributions to the ASF, the members voted to
invite Luciano to become an ASF Member. IMO, this was
I have reorganized the directory structure in sandbox/travelsample
so that the code structure is the same as for the rest of Tuscany:
src/main/java/xxxJava code for package xxx
src/main/resources other files: composite, WSDL, BPEL, HTML, CSS, XSD
src/main/resources/META-INF
Raymond Feng wrote:
Yes, the injected proxy for callback decides its target based on the
incoming invocation on the thread. For the concurrent access to the
composite-scoped component, synchronizations may be required for the
business logic but the callback proxy should be able to handle
Scott Kurz wrote:
I thought it was useful to point out that was specifically a problem w/
a callback over binding.sca, as the proxy set up for a binding.ws
http://binding.ws (axis2) callback should be able to call back to the
right client today, right?
It shouldn't make any difference what
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to get a handle on a policy problem where I get a NPE in the
Axis runtime. The NPE is caused because Axis is failing to find a named
operation. It's looking for an operation of the form
{http://helloworld}getGreetings
but failing as the operation is registered in
Simon Laws wrote:
So it affects the namespace of the
binding definition, but it shouldn't affect the namespace of the
global elements used by message parts within the portType
referenced by the binding (i.e., what goes on the wire).
In this example the portType is
Scott Kurz wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n...@apache.org wrote:
Scott Kurz wrote:
I thought it was useful to point out that was specifically a
problem w/ a callback over binding.sca, as the proxy set up
Simon Laws wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n...@apache.org wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
So it affects the namespace of the
binding definition, but it shouldn't affect the namespace of the
global elements used
-contributions.
Are these intended to be the same thing? If not, could one of
them be renamed?
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash n...@apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:53 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Travel sample directory
Simon Laws wrote:
Use 1.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.4 for the travelsample version number
+1, this is separate sample so no requirement for it to be tied to the
Tuscany runtime version
Change maven repo artifact names to travelsample-
+0
This probably needs a bit
ant elder wrote:
oops, didn't go to the dev list...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org
mailto:antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Luciano Resende
luckbr1...@gmail.com mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
-
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
oops, didn't go to the dev list...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org
mailto:antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Luciano Resende
luckbr1...@gmail.com mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote
Simon Laws wrote:
On further investigation, I see that some of the artifacts already
have artifact names like scatours-xxx, not tuscany-scatours-xxx.
I didn't realise this when I sent my previous email. So another
way to achieve consistency would be to rename the artifacts that
Scott Kurz wrote:
Simon,
Just trying to educate myself here...
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n...@apache.org wrote:
For binding-ws-axis2, the callback endpoint from the input message
is resolved at the time the proxy is created, not at the time
and creditcardpayment-jaxb-contribution
to make it clear which version is which.
Is any other code using the JAXB version? I am wondering why it
is part of shared-contributions.
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Nash n...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday
Simon Laws wrote:
Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code
// assume pass-by-values copies are required if
interfaces are remotable and there is no data binding
// transformation, i.e. a transformation will result in
a copy so
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org
mailto:n...@apache.org wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code
// assume pass-by-values copies are required
Simon Laws wrote:
Use 1.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.4 for the travelsample version number
+1, this is separate sample so no requirement for it to be tied to the
Tuscany runtime version
Change maven repo artifact names to travelsample-
+0
Fix up the ant
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On further investigation, I see that some of the artifacts already
have artifact names like scatours-xxx, not tuscany-scatours-xxx.
I didn't realise this when I sent my previous email. So another
way to achieve consistency would be to rename
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
My preference is:
1) scatours-xxx
2) travalsample-xxx
snip...
I'd like to go ahead and make these changes. We have three options
that have been proposed:
1. Use travelsample-xxx for all the maven
Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if we still want to have this release branch just yet
now. If we're waiting for the Axis2 release and it looks like that
will be at least a couple of weeks and there's still
Simon Nash wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Simon Laws
simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if we still want to have this release branch just yet
now. If we're waiting for the Axis2 release and it looks like that
will be at least a couple of weeks
Simon Laws wrote:
I think it's not desirable to do this because it means the travel sample
would continue to depend on a SNAPSHOT version of Tuscany even after
1.5 is released. AIUI, the current SNAPSHOT dependency is there because
of bugs in 1.4 that prevented the travel sample from working.
I noticed that the launcher in chapter02/node-jumpstart puts the
goodvaluetrips-contribution code on the classpath. In general it
isn't a good idea to put contribution code on the classpath because
this prevents the classes in the contribution from being loaded by
the contribution class loader,
I have started to restructure the travel sample code. In the new
structure, all the contributions are grouped together under a
contributions folder and all the launchers are grouped together
under a launchers folder. Each launcher uses a selection of
contributions from the contributions folder.
not change the code in chapter-02/node-jumpstart.
Simon
Simon Nash wrote:
I noticed that the launcher in chapter02/node-jumpstart puts the
goodvaluetrips-contribution code on the classpath. In general it
isn't a good idea to put contribution code on the classpath because
this prevents
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I had a chat with Mike about what to do to improve this and we have a
way that will help for now while we don't have a more comprehensive
approach that works when we've support for distributed domains
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Simon
It's not clear to me from your answer whether you think that
SCAClientFactory is or isn't intended to return an SCAClient
implementation appropriate for the domain you which to retrieve
Thanks for this proposal. It helps to see something concrete.
See questions/comments inline below.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
FYI a full build shows five failures presently:
samples\binding-notification-consumer
samples\binding-notification-producer
samples\simple-callback-ws
itest\exceptions
itest\jms
I'll start with
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Simon Laws
simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
FYI a full build shows five failures presently:
samples\binding-notification-consumer
samples\binding-notification-producer
samples\simple-callback-ws
itest\exceptions
itest\jms
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
I think it is. But maybe what we could do is run though the tests,
legal etc in 1.x before cutting the branch to give a day or so more
for responses. I intend to give the samples a runt through as soon as
I
ant elder wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
I think it is. But maybe what we could do is run though the tests,
legal etc in 1.x before cutting the branch to give
ant elder wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
I think it is. But maybe what we
I don't agree with the change to introducing-launcher in this commit
that puts the client code inline and eliminates the use of the
introducing-client-contribution.
Having the client code as part of the launcher is acceptable for
jumpstart-launcher to keep this sample very simple, but for the
I'm unable to start the fullapp-launcher for the travel smaple.
The build.xml file has some problems so I fixed these locally
using the pattern from build.xml in introducing-launcher.
With this change, I am seeing the following error.
Simon
1 - 100 of 909 matches
Mail list logo
