Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-26 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Seperating this one out to its own email as its a bit long... On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote:

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-26 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: One thing from earlier in the conversation was that it was established there could be multiple deployable composites within a contribution and that there may be multiple contributions, the runtime launching needs to be

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Laws
...@gmail.comwrote: It's a different way to classify how an SCA composite application can be launched using Tuscany runtime. Thanks, Raymond *From:* Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:20 AM *To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Laws
7:20 AM *To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching In addition to the various environment, there are two styles to launch an SCA composite application: 1) The Tuscany runtime is not on the classpath and the SCA application doesn't call any Tuscany

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-17 Thread ant elder
application can be launched using Tuscany runtime. Thanks, Raymond *From:* Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:20 AM *To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching In addition to the various environment, there are two

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-17 Thread ant elder
Seperating this one out to its own email as its a bit long... On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Separate launchers vs parameterized launcher. I probably marginally favour a parameterized purely from the point of view that it gives Tuscany a persona

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-16 Thread Simon Laws
*To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching In addition to the various environment, there are two styles to launch an SCA composite application: 1) The Tuscany runtime is not on the classpath and the SCA application doesn't call any Tuscany APIs except

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-16 Thread Raymond Feng
: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:45 AM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: It's a different way to classify how an SCA composite application can be launched using Tuscany runtime

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-16 Thread Simon Laws
Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:20 AM *To:* dev@tuscany.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching In addition to the various environment, there are two styles to launch an SCA composite application: 1) The Tuscany runtime

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Some mechanisms we have used to date. Turns out to be quite long and I expect there are more I have overlooked. Any help to orangize/rationlize this lot is appreciated. Tuscany User == Someone who wants to

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread Simon Laws
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Some mechanisms we have used to date. Turns out to be quite long and I expect there are more I have overlooked. Any help to orangize/rationlize

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Some mechanisms we have used to date. Turns out to be quite long

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:24 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread Simon Laws
In addition to the various environment, there are two styles to launch an SCA composite application: 1) The Tuscany runtime is not on the classpath and the SCA application doesn't call any Tuscany APIs except the SCA Java annotations and APIs. Is this covered by User/Command line without

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-13 Thread Raymond Feng
It's a different way to classify how an SCA composite application can be launched using Tuscany runtime. Thanks, Raymond From: Simon Laws Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:20 AM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching In addition to the various

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-09 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Some mechanisms we have used to date. Turns out to be quite long and I expect there are more I have overlooked. Any help to orangize/rationlize this lot is appreciated. Tuscany User == Someone who wants to

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-09 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Some mechanisms we have used to date. Turns out to be quite long and I expect there are more I have overlooked. Any help to orangize/rationlize

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-09 Thread haleh mahbod
Is what Simon have written a good summary for 1.x user doc? This is missing from the doc. Why is domain in a separate line of its own if it applies to all those environments? On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, ant elder

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-09 Thread Simon Laws
Why is domain in a separate line of its own if it applies to all those environments? On this list I mean running the separate domain manager which currently we only have to do if we want to run distributed.

Re: [2.x] [DISCUSS] Tuscany runtime launching

2009-01-09 Thread Raymond Feng
Good summary. In addition to the various environment, there are two styles to launch an SCA composite application: 1) The Tuscany runtime is not on the classpath and the SCA application doesn't call any Tuscany APIs except the SCA Java annotations and APIs. 2) The Tuscany runtime (or a subset)