Re: [2.x] split package in domain node

2009-09-02 Thread Simon Laws
Thanks Raymond I'm seeing missing import-package headers too. The issue is far deeper than just the split packages. It creates quite a few dependencies to the internal implementation classes. We need to find better ways to handle such things. +1 I fixed the obvious ones under r810317 and

[2.x] split package in domain node

2009-09-01 Thread Simon Laws
I note that the domain-node module defines the package... org.apache.tuscany.sca.node Which is also defined in node-api. Is this necessary? How about org.apache.tuscany.sca.domain.node I can't get my Eclipse PDE workspace to settle down with the latest 2.x code (I do get a clean maven build)

Re: [2.x] split package in domain node

2009-09-01 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: How about org.apache.tuscany.sca.domain.node That seems fine for now so go for it. We can rationalize all the domainy modules and packages later on. ...ant

Re: [2.x] split package in domain node

2009-09-01 Thread Simon Laws
I'm also getting lots of manifest problems in the domain-node and endpoint-wrapper area. Are the manifests in svn intended to be correct? Simon

Re: [2.x] split package in domain node

2009-09-01 Thread Raymond Feng
simonsl...@googlemail.com Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:01 AM To: dev@tuscany.apache.org; antel...@apache.org Subject: Re: [2.x] split package in domain node I'm also getting lots of manifest problems in the domain-node and endpoint-wrapper area. Are the manifests in svn intended