On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
documentation and has received precious little feedback to date.
The test build for this release is available at:
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-)
:-)
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
If you need the extra hour, then you are welcome to it. :)
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-)
:-)
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools
I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :)
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Will Glass-Husain
Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44
To: Velocity Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi
-1. ant test
Maybe it's a Windows issue?
On 6/28/07, Marinó A. Jónsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :)
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Will Glass-Husain
Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44
To: Velocity
Hi Marino,
Just to clarify... when you tested the build, did you actually download the
binary release candidate and do 'ant test' from there? Or did you just work
from svn head.
Looking at Nathan's recent commit, I think the actual release binary was
missing the test files.
WILL
On 6/28/07,
Turns out the test directory was being left out of the source zips,
both in 2.x and 1.x. I'll re-post the vote for 2.0-alpha1 promptly...
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
-1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm
running JDK 1.5 and ant
-1. (sorry!)
There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have
size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing ant docs also produces bad
docs.
Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious.
On the positive side, ant test worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6
