[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681178#action_12681178
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-704:
---
Ok, i think that should do it code-wise.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project velocity-engine has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-680.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
This has been obviated by the deprecation/removal of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681380#action_12681380
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-540:
---
I should note that the $macro namespace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-540.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.7
With the addition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-687.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Seems to me that Byron already made the switch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-697.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Byron, i'm marking this resolved, because the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681385#action_12681385
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-695:
---
I think that so long as someone else
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-698.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
1.7
The #stop(parse) is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681415#action_12681415
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-704:
---
Ok, not quite done with code changes...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681451#action_12681451
]
Byron Foster commented on VELOCITY-697:
---
Sounds good, I was leaving it open for any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Byron Foster closed VELOCITY-695.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Better huu? :) Ok, looks like this is going in, so I'll close it. Change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681456#action_12681456
]
Byron Foster commented on VELOCITY-698:
---
yea, no need for this anymore.
If #stop
In 1.x we have:
directive.set.null.allowed = false
I think that we should flip that to true and perhaps even remove the
option in 2.0.
Does anyone out there rely on not being able to change variables to null?
Does anyone out there even remember why it wasn't allowed in the first place?
Hi,
I think we should simply remove the option since it was really a
backwards compatibility hack. Do we have a null object? We should.
In fact, as a general rule for 2.0 I propose we just fix this stuff
and remove the special casing. (Same issue for escaping of
characters, by the way).
WILL
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think we should simply remove the option since it was really a
backwards compatibility hack. Do we have a null object? We should.
We don't need a null object/keyword. $null works fantastically. Keep
it
On Mar 12, 2009, at 18:18 , Nathan Bubna wrote:
In 1.x we have:
directive.set.null.allowed = false
I think that we should flip that to true and perhaps even remove the
option in 2.0.
Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
17 matches
Mail list logo