Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-04-05 Thread Ted Husted
So, did this get released? I I've been working in DocBook myself lately. -Ted. On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] This is the CfV for the first release of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] This is the CfV for the first release of the Velocity DocBook Framework. It is intended for creating and maintaining high

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Marshall Schor
Hi everyone - The UIMA project has embraced the docbook process, starting with setup that Velocity had. We use it to produce our documentation in HTML (single) and PDF. We've perhaps improved it in some small ways, but haven't found the time to clean up what we've done quite yet. I would

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Will Glass-Husain
+1 from me. Looking forward to seeing this approach become more widely adopted. WILL On 3/22/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While I think a point by point debate would be silly, I think it'd be really useful if you could

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Robert Koberg
it is always wise to run in the opposite direction to get next door On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:08:57 -0400, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi everyone - The UIMA project has embraced the docbook process, starting with setup

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Will Glass-Husain
This makes a lot of sense to me. Released projects have visibility (and an implied ease-of-use) that a labs type effort does not. I think you'll be more likely to get adoption (and contributions) as a visible subproject of Velocity. Nice documentation, by the way. (Like the PDF file). Though

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-21 Thread Robert Koberg
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:07:46 -0400, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] u... 'bored out of my mind' after taking a very simple thing and making it extremely

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/21/07, Robert Koberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:07:46 -0400, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] u... 'bored out of my mind' after taking a

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-03-21 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Ouch - that's a pretty unfriendly and non-productive email. Henning, you made a great case for DocBook at ApacheCon US 2006 in your lightning talk. I'm looking forward to downloading and taking a look at your proposed release. While I think a point by point debate would be silly, I think it'd