+1
On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
Ok, here's the corrected tally, sent at the proper time. :)
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron Austin
Will Glass-Husain
Henning Schmiedehausen
Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
RAT looks good, builds for me with JDK 1.6.0_10 on i386 Linux (Fedora).
+1
Ciao
Henning
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 07:08 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron Austin
Will Glass-Husain
Henning Schmiedehausen
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAT looks good, builds for me with JDK 1.6.0_10 on i386 Linux (Fedora).
+1
Ciao
Shoot. Meant to save that as a draft and send it first thing
tomorrow. Just consider this to have been sent about 12 hours from
now. :) Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron
+1.
Ran ant test with JDK 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 on WinXP. Really great work, Nathan.
Saw a small item I didn't catch the other day-- only needs to be fixed if
you reroll the release. The POM file refers to the devel path in a couple
of places. Example:
urlhttp://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel//url
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6/
Please vote regarding
+1 from me.
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
+1 from me
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available
+1 test build works great for us :)
-- Ilkka
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
I suppose i should officially vote too... +1!
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote...
The test build is still available here:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0
rat reports some files missing license headers:
./src/java/org/apache/velocity/util/introspection/LinkingUberspector.java
+1 from me.
Nathan Bubna wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote...
The test build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta1/
Please vote regarding your support for releasing
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote...
The test build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta1/
Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as
Velocity Engine
Cool!
I didn't have a chance to look at test build but will poke and prod this
one.
July 3 is more than 72 hours away. Time to flip your calendar. :-)
WILL
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback
Oops. I was copy/pasting an old CfV email. I saw that the Thursday
part was correct and missed the date. The correct date would be the
infamous 11th of Sept.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Will Glass-Husain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool!
I didn't have a chance to look at test build but
16 matches
Mail list logo