[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-engine-test (in module velocity-engine) failed

2007-10-30 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-engine-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: performance improvements

2007-10-30 Thread Stanislaus
Hi.. This is Stan from India.. I have recently upgraded velocity 1.4 to velocity 1.5 And all the related jar files are updated.. I face a problem that.. the performance is down when updated from 1.4 to 1.5 in the development environment.. I mean that I have configured my project in

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-texen-test (in module velocity-texen) failed

2007-10-30 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-texen-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Schultz updated VELTOOLS-88: Attachment: VELTOOLS-88.diff Patch to implement this feature. It implements the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24375] - VMs that use a large number of directives and macros use excessive amounts of memory - over 4-6MB RAM per form

2007-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-engine-test (in module velocity-engine) failed

2007-10-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 10/30/07, Velocity Gump dev@velocity.apache.org wrote: ... [junit] Running org.apache.velocity.test.BuiltInEventHandlerTestCase [junit] Caught invalid references (local configuration). [junit] Caught invalid references (global configuration). [junit] Correctly escaped HTML

Re: [veltools] Unnecessary toEncoded method in struts.SecureLinkTool?

2007-10-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
from looking at the source code, there is a comment within the method that implies that SSLExt also supports this sort of toEncoded() behavior, but handles anchor/query string ordering differently. any idea how response.encodeURL() handles those (if it does at all)? i didn't write that code, so

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-engine-test (in module velocity-engine) failed

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
Will, Will Glass-Husain wrote: I can't figure out why this happened. ant test passes on my local machine. What changed? Messing around with the VELOTOOLS build (and test) scripts, I saw that the junit element has this sub-element: formatter type=plain / I also found that no errors are ever

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-engine-test (in module velocity-engine) failed

2007-10-30 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Good catch! It's here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-363 and the svn update here http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/StringEscapeUtils.java?r1=560660r2=588534 That's annoying. Our current test breaks with commons-lang trunk,

[veltools] Unit testing best practices

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, I recently added a JIRA enhancement and included a patch. I want to add a unit test (for my changes to the LinkTool) to the existing tests, but I'm having trouble doing so. First, the test system itself is cumbersome (to me). It tries to start servlet container instances and stuff like

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538881 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-88: -- Nice feature. It sorta overlaps the self() method when

Regarding Velocity 1.5

2007-10-30 Thread Stanislaus Prabu
Hi.. This is Stan from India.. I have recently upgraded velocity 1.4 to velocity 1.5 And all the related jar files are updated.. I face a problem that.. the performance is down when updated from 1.4 to 1.5 in the development environment.. I mean that I have configured my project in

Re: [veltools] Unit testing best practices

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: two ideas: 1) find out what other projects with similar needs use. 2) search google for libs to support this Yeah, I googled for mock servlet and found a bunch of things. Nothing really jumped out at me for a good solution. Since my needs are slim (testing this

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538905 ] Christopher Schultz commented on VELTOOLS-88: - The use of addQueryData for each of the parameters was a

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Schultz updated VELTOOLS-88: Attachment: (was: VELTOOLS-88.diff) LinkTool could easily be modified to

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Schultz updated VELTOOLS-88: Attachment: VELTOOLS-88.diff Replaced deleted patch for historical pusposes.

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Schultz updated VELTOOLS-88: Attachment: VELTOOLS-88a.diff Updated patch addresses Nathan's concerns. Take a

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-88) LinkTool could easily be modified to support current-request parameter duplication

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Schultz updated VELTOOLS-88: Attachment: LinkToolTests.java Unit test to exercise new ignore and add all

Re: [veltools] Unit testing best practices

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: hmm. i haven't run a full ant test on the trunk lately, though ant test.generic worked recently when i checked in the RenderTool fix. i'll try it out. probably something broken. i've been pretty focused on 2.x lately. Er... should I be working in a branch and

Re: [veltools] Unit testing best practices

2007-10-30 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 10/30/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: hmm. i haven't run a full ant test on the trunk lately, though ant test.generic worked recently when i checked in the RenderTool fix. i'll try it out. probably something broken. i've been pretty

Re: [veltools] Unit testing best practices

2007-10-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: On 10/30/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: hmm. i haven't run a full ant test on the trunk lately, though ant test.generic worked recently when i checked in the RenderTool fix. i'll try it out. probably something