Nathan,
On 4/13/11 12:03 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Claude Brisson cla...@renegat.net wrote:
On 2011-04-13 11:57, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hi Claude
2011/4/13 Claude Brissoncla...@renegat.net
...
Then I'd vote for the first solution: have tools-2.1 require
Do you want a new 2.0 release? I can't recall offhand if there is/was
a particular need or demand for one.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nathan,
On 4/13/11 12:03 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Claude Brisson
Nathan,
On 1/31/12 12:39 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Do you want a new 2.0 release? I can't recall offhand if there is/was
a particular need or demand for one.
No, but I was going to make some changes that I need fixing :)
So, the question is whether to commit to trunk and back-port to 2.0.x,
or
I have no active plans to release 2.0.x.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nathan,
On 1/31/12 12:39 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Do you want a new 2.0 release? I can't recall offhand if there is/was
a particular need or demand for one.
No,
