[RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-07-02 Thread Nathan Bubna
The vote has passed: +1 Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain, Claude Brisson No other votes were recorded. On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-07-02 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Glad it passed. Just a weekend is a bit short. Best regards Henning On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:08 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote: The vote has passed: +1 Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain, Claude Brisson No other votes were recorded. On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-06-30 Thread Claude Brisson
Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 14:25 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit : On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1. (sorry!) There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing ant docs also produces bad docs.

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
will start disappearing in subsequent version minor version releases. Calling this a 1.x release would be quite a stretch. Ahmed. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-VelocityTools-2.0-alpha1-tf3991455.html#a11361412 Sent from the Velocity - Dev mailing list

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-06-29 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs will get support on the list. does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the docs have been updated and so many of them are

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-06-29 Thread Claude Brisson
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok... The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to use it! There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not ready and will wait for the 2.1 release. so, +1 One remark: when fully rebuilding I saw that

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-06-29 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/29/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok... The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to use it! good to hear! There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not ready and will wait for the

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. The test build for this release is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Will Glass-Husain
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-) :-) On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
If you need the extra hour, then you are welcome to it. :) On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-) :-) On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VelocityTools

RE: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Marinó A . Jónsson
I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :) +1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Glass-Husain Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44 To: Velocity Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 Hi -1. ant test

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Will Glass-Husain
Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with ant env and ant -version). * downloaded velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip * unzip and cd to main directory

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Will Glass-Husain
-Husain Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44 To: Velocity Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with ant env and ant -version). * downloaded velocity-tools

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
Turns out the test directory was being left out of the source zips, both in 2.x and 1.x. I'll re-post the vote for 2.0-alpha1 promptly... On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi -1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm running JDK 1.5 and ant

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1 (Take 2)

2007-06-28 Thread Will Glass-Husain
-1. (sorry!) There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing ant docs also produces bad docs. Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious. On the positive side, ant test worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6

[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1

2007-06-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated documentation and has received precious little feedback to date. The test build for this release is available at: