The vote has passed:
+1 Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain, Claude Brisson
No other votes were recorded.
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed
and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry that
Glad it passed. Just a weekend is a bit short.
Best regards
Henning
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:08 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote:
The vote has passed:
+1 Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain, Claude Brisson
No other votes were recorded.
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL
Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 14:25 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1. (sorry!)
There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have
size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing ant docs also produces bad
docs.
will start disappearing in subsequent version
minor version releases. Calling this a 1.x release would be quite a
stretch.
Ahmed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-VelocityTools-2.0-alpha1-tf3991455.html#a11361412
Sent from the Velocity - Dev mailing list
Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After
all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs
will get support on the list.
does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the
docs have been updated and so many of them are
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok...
The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to
use it!
There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not
ready and will wait for the 2.1 release.
so,
+1
One remark: when fully rebuilding I saw that
On 6/29/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok...
The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to
use it!
good to hear!
There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not
ready and will wait for the
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
documentation and has received precious little feedback to date.
The test build for this release is available at:
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-)
:-)
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
If you need the extra hour, then you are welcome to it. :)
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-)
:-)
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools
I'm using the current HEAD and it works fine for me :)
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Will Glass-Husain
Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44
To: Velocity Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi
-1. ant test
Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi
-1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm
running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with ant env and ant
-version).
* downloaded velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src.zip
* unzip and cd to main directory
-Husain
Sent: 28. júní 2007 18:44
To: Velocity Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-alpha1
Hi
-1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm
running JDK 1.5 and ant 1.7. (confirmed with ant env and ant
-version).
* downloaded velocity-tools
Turns out the test directory was being left out of the source zips,
both in 2.x and 1.x. I'll re-post the vote for 2.0-alpha1 promptly...
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
-1. ant test fails for me. Or is there something I'm doing wrong? I'm
running JDK 1.5 and ant
-1. (sorry!)
There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have
size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing ant docs also produces bad
docs.
Again, let me know if I'm missing something obvious.
On the positive side, ant test worked fine under both JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
documentation and has received precious little feedback to date.
The test build for this release is available at:
16 matches
Mail list logo