I can see some value in this process, but not enough that i really care either way for myself. I'll do whatever pleases. :)
On 1/11/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I just reopened and resolved some issues. Reason for this is: I'd like to follow the proposed status lifecycle as shown on http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/v3.7.1/issues.html#StatusTypes. That means, we don't close issues immediately but resolve them with a "resolution" (Fixed/Won't fix/Later/Can't reproduce etc.). Once we to a particular release, we then close all issues that have been marked "resolved" for that release. Reason for this is to distinguish between issues for the current release and historic ones. It might be that this is too artificial / I am too anal here. If you think so, please speak up. ;-) Best regards Henning -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy "Save the cheerleader. Save the world." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
