Hi,
I have the following patch here:
-public abstract class Page extends MarkupContainer implements
IRedirectListener, IRequestablePage
+public abstract class Page extends MarkupContainer implements
IRequestablePage
{
/** True if the page hierarchy has been modified in the current
I've missed RedirectPage in my search the first time. Thanks!
Here is a better version:
diff --git
i/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/pages/RedirectPage.java
w/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/pages/RedirectPage.java
index 9b60bea..57f6f1f 100644
---
Martin,
Glad to be of some help. Also markup of RedirectPage.html
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org;headmeta
wicket:id=redirect http-equiv=refresh content=0;
url=app//head/html
might be
Since #onRedirect() is final currently, I'm +1 to remove IRedirectListener.
Sven
On 02/20/2014 11:03 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I've missed RedirectPage in my search the first time. Thanks!
Here is a better version:
diff --git
This is the fourteenth maintenance release of the Wicket 6.x series.
This release brings 25 bug fixes and improvements.
Git tag:
release/wicket-6.14.0
Changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12325860styleName=projectId=12310561
Maven:
dependency
IMHO removing final would be the correct thing: this could be useful in
case a user wants to do something on a page when they are redirected from
another. Sample use case.
1- I have a (mounted) page with some functionality. I have used this page
for some e-mail or some URL user keep..
2- I have
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO removing final would be the correct thing: this could be useful in
case a user wants to do something on a page when they are redirected from
another. Sample use case.
1- I have a (mounted) page with
I do agree
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO removing final would be the correct thing: this could be useful in
case a user wants to do something on a page
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, ivaynb...@apache.org wrote:
WICKET-3335 nested borders working. everything should be working. needs
more cleanup and javadoc
Project:
