[GitHub] wicket issue #256: WICKET-6517 ajax multipart

2018-02-06 Thread andruhon
Github user andruhon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/256 I created an issue in JIRA with beforeSend issue mentioned above https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6532 ---

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Tobias Soloschenko
Yes it is a very short description. So what I meant is that the client side uses the dynamic proxy which executes a rest action against the server and hand over class / parameters to the endpoint. The repsonse is automatically transfered into the business object with JSON. The server however

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko" wrote: Hi, I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. So what to do: 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Tobias Soloschenko
Hi, I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. So what to do: 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html) with all

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Kamil Paśko
I want it. You have my... umm.. keyboard! ;) W dniu 2018-02-06 o 19:41, Martin Grigorov pisze: On Feb 6, 2018 16:24, "Kamil Paśko" wrote: why not RC1 ? :) Because then we will be one step closer to the final release. And no one really wants that :-) W dniu

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Feb 6, 2018 16:24, "Kamil Paśko" wrote: why not RC1 ? :) Because then we will be one step closer to the final release. And no one really wants that :-) W dniu 2018-02-06 o 13:56, Martin Grigorov pisze: Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9! > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket

[GitHub] wicket pull request #261: Wicket 6523 ajax timers

2018-02-06 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/261 ---

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Kamil Paśko
why not RC1 ? :) W dniu 2018-02-06 o 13:56, Martin Grigorov pisze: Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me! https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andrea Del Bene

[GitHub] wicket issue #266: WICKET-6530: fix possible race-condition for session inva...

2018-02-06 Thread papegaaij
Github user papegaaij commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/266 It has already been backported. The patch applied mostly cleanly on 7.x and 6.x. ---

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Martin Grigorov
But there are few open PRs. Better merge them before the release! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me! https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Changed 8.0.0

[GitHub] wicket issue #266: WICKET-6530: fix possible race-condition for session inva...

2018-02-06 Thread martin-g
Github user martin-g commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/266 This should be backported to 7.x/6.x, no ? ---

Re: [jira] [Updated] (WICKET-6530) Race-condition in session invalidation

2018-02-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Great! My mail client is having trouble keeping up with all the mai :) On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:55:49 CET Martin Grigorov wrote: > Yes, I also noticed. > Fixed! > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me! >

[GitHub] wicket pull request #263: WICKET-6526 check HTTP method for all form submiss...

2018-02-06 Thread martin-g
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/263#discussion_r166287202 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -1203,6 +1203,27 @@ + --- End diff --

[GitHub] wicket pull request #262: WICKET-6526 check HTTP method for all form submiss...

2018-02-06 Thread martin-g
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/262#discussion_r166286917 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -184,6 +184,28 @@ + --- End diff --

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Martin Grigorov
Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me! https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > We need M9 on jira in order to proceed with the

Re: [jira] [Updated] (WICKET-6530) Race-condition in session invalidation

2018-02-06 Thread Martin Grigorov
Yes, I also noticed. Fixed! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me! https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Emond Papegaaij wrote: > On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:49:03 CET Martin

Re: [jira] [Updated] (WICKET-6530) Race-condition in session invalidation

2018-02-06 Thread Emond Papegaaij
On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:49:03 CET Martin Grigorov (JIRA) wrote: > Martin Grigorov updated WICKET-6530: > > Fix Version/s: (was: 6.29.0) >(was: 7.10.0) >(was: 8.0.0) >8.0.0-M9

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Andrea Del Bene
We need M9 on jira in order to proceed with the release. Now all the issues are solved for 8.0.0 On Feb 6, 2018 1:24 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote: Hello All, do we have any blockers for "the very last" M release? On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Andrea Del Bene

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

2018-02-06 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello All, do we have any blockers for "the very last" M release? On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the article I > linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and funny)

Re: getInputAsArray behavior

2018-02-06 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Works as expected! Thanks for the quick fix :) On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > you're right, it was related to multipart requests: > > Empty inputs must be appended as "" to the FormData, otherwise "null" will > be sent to the server. > > Many

Re: getInputAsArray behavior

2018-02-06 Thread Sven Meier
Hi Maxim, you're right, it was related to multipart requests: Empty inputs must be appended as "" to the FormData, otherwise "null" will be sent to the server. Many thanks Sven Am 06.02.2018 um 03:55 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Hello Sven, sorry for delay Here is the quick-start: