Github user andruhon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/256
I created an issue in JIRA with beforeSend issue mentioned above
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6532
---
Yes it is a very short description.
So what I meant is that the client side uses the dynamic proxy which executes a
rest action against the server and hand over class / parameters to the
endpoint. The repsonse is automatically transfered into the business object
with JSON. The server however
On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko"
wrote:
Hi,
I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces.
So what to do:
1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project
2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy
Hi,
I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces.
So what to do:
1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project
2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy
(https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html)
with all
I want it. You have my... umm.. keyboard! ;)
W dniu 2018-02-06 o 19:41, Martin Grigorov pisze:
On Feb 6, 2018 16:24, "Kamil Paśko" wrote:
why not RC1 ? :)
Because then we will be one step closer to the final release.
And no one really wants that :-)
W dniu
On Feb 6, 2018 16:24, "Kamil Paśko" wrote:
why not RC1 ? :)
Because then we will be one step closer to the final release.
And no one really wants that :-)
W dniu 2018-02-06 o 13:56, Martin Grigorov pisze:
Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9!
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/261
---
why not RC1 ? :)
W dniu 2018-02-06 o 13:56, Martin Grigorov pisze:
Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me!
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andrea Del Bene
Github user papegaaij commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/266
It has already been backported. The patch applied mostly cleanly on 7.x and
6.x.
---
But there are few open PRs.
Better merge them before the release!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me!
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Changed 8.0.0
Github user martin-g commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/266
This should be backported to 7.x/6.x, no ?
---
Great! My mail client is having trouble keeping up with all the mai :)
On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:55:49 CET Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Yes, I also noticed.
> Fixed!
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me!
>
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/263#discussion_r166287202
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1203,6 +1203,27 @@
+
--- End diff --
Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/262#discussion_r166286917
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -184,6 +184,28 @@
+
--- End diff --
Changed 8.0.0 to 8.0.0-M9!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me!
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> We need M9 on jira in order to proceed with the
Yes, I also noticed.
Fixed!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
Looking for a remote position with Wicket ? Contact me!
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:49:03 CET Martin
On dinsdag 6 februari 2018 13:49:03 CET Martin Grigorov (JIRA) wrote:
> Martin Grigorov updated WICKET-6530:
>
> Fix Version/s: (was: 6.29.0)
>(was: 7.10.0)
>(was: 8.0.0)
>8.0.0-M9
We need M9 on jira in order to proceed with the release. Now all the issues
are solved for 8.0.0
On Feb 6, 2018 1:24 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
Hello All,
do we have any blockers for "the very last" M release?
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Andrea Del Bene
Hello All,
do we have any blockers for "the very last" M release?
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the article I
> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and funny)
Works as expected!
Thanks for the quick fix :)
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> you're right, it was related to multipart requests:
>
> Empty inputs must be appended as "" to the FormData, otherwise "null" will
> be sent to the server.
>
> Many
Hi Maxim,
you're right, it was related to multipart requests:
Empty inputs must be appended as "" to the FormData, otherwise "null"
will be sent to the server.
Many thanks
Sven
Am 06.02.2018 um 03:55 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
Hello Sven,
sorry for delay
Here is the quick-start:
21 matches
Mail list logo