Hi,
as you know I am a big fan of HTML5 and was experimenting a lot with it, I
would also vote to stay with a core css and clean it up, because of a better
backward compatibility. flex is used a LOT in modern layouts and would break
the other option.
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 26.02.2020 um
reiern70 commented on a change in pull request #410: [WICKET-6750] allow to
abort currently executing request for a given …
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/410#discussion_r384522325
##
File path:
reiern70 commented on a change in pull request #410: [WICKET-6750] allow to
abort currently executing request for a given …
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/410#discussion_r384522677
##
File path:
reiern70 commented on a change in pull request #410: [WICKET-6750] allow to
abort currently executing request for a given …
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/410#discussion_r384522325
##
File path:
reiern70 opened a new pull request #410: [WICKET-6750] allow to abort currently
executing request for a given …
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/410
allow to abort currently executing request for a given Ajax channel + example
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:15 AM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:54 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> > > - it's a kitchen-sink for left-over styles (see .wicket--color-red)
> >
> > I agree that for this one Wicket can just add the CSS class (e.g.
> > wicket-feedback-indicator) on
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:54 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> [] leave as is with .wicket--hidden & wicket-core.css
>
> [] use HTML5 "hidden" attribute instead
>
While it is true that Wicket hasn't depended on a CSS file for its own use,
it has been dependent on its own styles, spread out through our
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:53 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
> I am also not big fan of CSP but users ask for it and I see no other way
> but to move all inline styles in such .css resource
IMHO CSP is one of the changes to the web application ecosystem that
Wicket will need an answer on to stay
reiern70 commented on a change in pull request #409: [WICKET-6750] allow to
abort currently executing AJAX request
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/409#discussion_r384385873
##
File path:
wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js
Hi Sven,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:54 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have a disagreement on how to style hidden elements in Wicket 9.x.
>
> Due to the new CSP support we can no longer use inline styling to hide
> elements.
> WICKET-6725 introduces new CSS classes and a file
reiern70 commented on a change in pull request #409: [WICKET-6750] allow to
abort currently executing AJAX request
URL: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/409#discussion_r384373648
##
File path:
wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js
Hi,
Right now I have no enough knowledge to vote in this feature. One thing I
didn't like, and I already mentioned it before, is some of us were waiting
for 9.x to be released some time ago (at least a few months ago I was
preparing some branch of our application and ported it to 9.x, after
[+] leave as is with .wicket--hidden & wicket-core.css
IMO we should sheep the version which will work as expected out-of-the-box
According to my tests `hidden` attribute doesn't work (even `display:
flex` breaks it)
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:22, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>
> +1 to vote. I find
+1 to vote. I find your concerns legitimate
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:54 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have a disagreement on how to style hidden elements in Wicket 9.x.
>
> Due to the new CSP support we can no longer use inline styling to hide
> elements.
> WICKET-6725 introduces new
14 matches
Mail list logo
