I've started this work for our project
seems to be doable
Maybe you can share what are the benefits?
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 15:15, Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov
wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/04/02 11:58:02, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start
CDI uses javax.enterprise.inject.Instance to inject optional beans. I
don't particular like this solution, but it works. The downside is
that it depends on the CDI API.
Best regards,
Emond
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:41 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:31 AM Sven Meier
Hi,
> I already removed queuing on an experimental branch, and it was quite
> simple.
>
>
Nice. We have the master branch of our application running on 9.3.0. and a
large set of selenium tests: I will try it against this branch.
Regards
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 02.06.21 08:36, Ernesto Reinaldo
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:31 AM Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't aware that Optional actually isn't serializable:
>
The real problem is that it is `final class`.
Even if it was Serializable we would still wrap it in a proxy that looks up
the real bean on demand / after deserialization.
We
Hi,
I wasn't aware that Optional actually isn't serializable:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24547673/why-java-util-optional-is-not-serializable-how-to-serialize-the-object-with-suc#24564612
"The JSR-335 EG felt fairly strongly that Optional should not be on any
more than needed to
On 2021/04/02 11:58:02, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working on
> Wicket 10 ?
>
> Here are few ideas what to break :-)
>
> 1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.**
> 2) Use @Inject + @Named instead of @SpringBean. If
Hi,
I already removed queuing on an experimental branch, and it was quite
simple.
Regards
Sven
On 02.06.21 08:36, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com>
I am not sure how to react on this '+1'.
Martin Terra, you requested this feature and then never bothered to upgrade
to something newer than 1.4.
Sorry, but your votes don't count anymore! :-)
Martin: I fully agree with you. How this feature was introduced can, at
least, be called "weird".
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:58 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What I mean is to do a table of pros VS cons of dropping this feature. For
> instance, I just remember someone did a profiling of his application and
> reported that wicket (in his application) was slower after this
Hi,
> > >
> > > It is removing + fixing back all things that were changed because of
> > this
> > > feature.I have the impression this implied a lot of minor changes. Now
> it
> > > is reverting all that and making sure everything works again. Thus I
> was
> > > just wondering if it will be
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:44 AM Martin Terra <
martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> ke 2. kesäk. 2021 klo 9.36 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro (reier...@gmail.com)
> kirjoitti:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM
Hi,
What I mean is to do a table of pros VS cons of dropping this feature. For
instance, I just remember someone did a profiling of his application and
reported that wicket (in his application) was slower after this feature was
introduced (a pro of removing it, maybe wicket will be faster). All
ke 2. kesäk. 2021 klo 9.36 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro (reier...@gmail.com)
kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > How much work
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > How much work do you think this will imply?
> >
>
> Removing the component queueing ?
> I am not sure. Removing should be
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> How much work do you think this will imply?
>
Removing the component queueing ?
I am not sure. Removing should be easier than implementing it.
Why do you ask ?
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at
15 matches
Mail list logo