Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 08:32 schreef Martin Grigorov : > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij > wrote: > > > Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov >: > > > > > Please update > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 > > > that

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:18 AM Korbinian Bachl < korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > When looking at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 > > I wondered what Jakarta version is required? Any. > > Is Jakarta 9.0 enough? Because, it says Java 17

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov : > > > Please update > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 > > that the Component Queueing is gone > > > > Before releasing M1 I think we need

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Korbinian Bachl
When looking at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 I wondered what Jakarta version is required? Is Jakarta 9.0 enough? Because, it says Java 17 needed - this is even above Jakarta 9.1 abd 10 that both have a JDK 11 baseline? Oh and also what does

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov : > Please update > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 > that the Component Queueing is gone > > Before releasing M1 I think we need to: > 1) update all dependencies to their latest stable version > 2)

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
Please update https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 that the Component Queueing is gone Before releasing M1 I think we need to: 1) update all dependencies to their latest stable version 2) copy over commons-fileupload2 classes to wicket-util or a new Maven

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Hi Sven! On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:30 PM Sven Meier wrote: > I've removed queuing on branch > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing > Still ready to be merged. > > We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we? > Yes! Many many thanks for your work. I remember someone

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
+1 :) from mobile (sorry for typos ;) On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, 05:41 Andrea Del Bene wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 8:31 PM Sven Meier wrote: > > > I've removed queuing on branch > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing > > Still ready to be merged. > > > > We agreed to remove it

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Andrea Del Bene
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 8:31 PM Sven Meier wrote: > I've removed queuing on branch > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing > Still ready to be merged. > > We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we? > the hell "yes" :-) Sven > > > On 08.02.23 12:54, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Sven Meier
I've removed queuing on branch https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing Still ready to be merged. We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we? Sven On 08.02.23 12:54, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing...

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Afaik the only blocker for m1 is fileupload2 ... from mobile (sorry for typos ;) On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 18:55 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: > No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing... No > idea if that landed on the master branch? > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing... No idea if that landed on the master branch? On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:03 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen that lately there have been some activities and questions related > to Wicket 10. Although we have some

Time for Wicket M1?

2023-02-08 Thread Andrea Del Bene
Hi, I've seen that lately there have been some activities and questions related to Wicket 10. Although we have some pending issues before proposing a release candidate, I think it's the right time for a first milestone release. What do you think? -- Andrea Del Bene. Apache Wicket committer.