Re: Wicket Weld into wicket 1.5?

On Tuesday 23 August 2011 16:17:43 Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: On Tuesday 23 August 2011 09:04:00 Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote

Re: [vote] Restructure Packaging for OSGi

(non-binding) 1) -1 Breaking the API in such a drastic way is simply not done between RCs. It's not as easy as simple reorganizing imports, because a lot of classes have name clashes with classes in other packages, which require manual interaction. It will take me about a day I guess to fix

Re: Wicketstuff maven repository

in central repo. On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi all, It seems the wicketstuff.org maven repository (at http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository) is offline. Is this intentional? Best regards, Emond

Re: [VOTE] add onDestroy to IRequestCycleListener

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: The Wicket 1.4 RequestCycle also provided 3 'onFinish' methods: detach, onAfterTargetsDetached and onEndRequest, which were invoked in that order. Perhaps, the solution is to move onEndRequest back

Re: 1.5 RC4 this weekend ?

On Thursday 05 May 2011 09:19:44 Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi, We have ~60 closed tickets since RC3. I think it is time for RC4. I've never did full release but I'll try to do one this weekend. If someone wants to fix something before RC4 then please respond to this mail. +1 for me, our 1000+

Re: [Wicketstuff 1.5] Code formatting

don't know if it is possible to let the Maven Eclipse plugin configure these settings. If so, that would be my choice. At Topicus we use svn:externals to add the same settings directory to every project. I don't know if this possible with git. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Thursday 07 April

Re: [Wicketstuff 1.5] Migrated wicket-security

:36:46 Martin Grigorov wrote: And you did this without finding a single bug in Wicket 1.5 ?! :-) Congrats! On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi all, I just migrated wicket-security to wicket 1.5 and moved it into Wicketstuff

Re: Moving from isVisible/isEnabled overrides to onConfigure

isEnableAllowed(). It is the counterpart of isRenderAllowed() and serves to implement security. People may depend on that behavior. I've added this clarification to the JIRA issue. Do you want to continue this discussion on the list, or at JIRA? Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Monday 28 March 2011 18

Moving from isVisible/isEnabled overrides to onConfigure

be changed. It is part of the public API. This new property would make it significantly easier to move to onConfigure. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Re: Annotation for classes which should not be serialized

Hi Martin, I really like this idea. At Topicus we had to copy-paste the entire thing to make it check for subclasses of 'Entiteit' (our entity base class). It also checks for LDMs that are still attached, because these are not catched by the current checker, because the object is stored in a

Strange writeObjectMethodCache in SerializableChecker

Hi all, At Topicus, we maintain a customized SerializableChecker with some additional checks. I was trying to fix some generics-warnings and noticed a strange thing about the writeObjectMethodCache. This variable is used in only 4 places, one is a clear, one a get and 2 are puts. Both puts

Re: Strange writeObjectMethodCache in SerializableChecker

+ patch ;-) What else do you have in this custom SerializableChecker ? Maybe it is something that other users may benefit from and it can be included in the standard SerializableChecker and you'll not have to maintain it. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl

Re: overriding isVisible bad?

On of the main problems I see with onConfigure() is that is a general 'configuration' method. In our code, we ofter create an anonymous inner-class, overriding the isVisible() method. These methods often look like 'return super.isVisible() someOtherCondition;'. This is a lot more difficult to

Re: wicket-security Subject getPrincipals

wicket-shiro, which does that. Also, rewriting Wicket Security to use Apache Shiro will force all users of Wicket Security to rewrite major parts of their application; something I really don't want. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:10:13 Les Hazlewood wrote: Hi

{Spam?} Re: wicket-security Subject getPrincipals

on doing some work on Wicket Security for Wicket 1.5, which should see some API improvements. However, my time is very limited at the moment. A release for 1.4, which fixes some minor bugs, is also on my todo list. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij On Monday 23 August 2010 13:30:41 Thibault Kruse wrote

Re: Comments on WASP with Shiro (fwd)

? In that case, perhaps some Wicket developer can comment on this? Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)

no longer need to depend on SNAPSHOT. I also would like to add some new features, like a ComponentSubclassPermission, which was discussed on the wicket-users mailing list. Can I get commit access for wicket-stuff? My SF id is 'papegaaij'. Best regards, Emond Papegaaij

Re: Commit access for wicket-stuff (wicket-security)

Thanks On Monday 11 January 2010 09:58:33 Martijn Dashorst wrote: Added. On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote: Hi all, After Maurice's car accident, no-one really stood up to maintain wicket- security. I would like to continue the work

<    1   2   3   4