On 2023/02/08 11:02:54 Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that lately there have been some activities and questions related
> to Wicket 10. Although we have some pending issues before proposing a
> release candidate, I think it's the right time for a first milestone
> release. What do you
This would be great for OSGi too =)
Perhaps move the class that import junit.* to a wicket-junit5 maven module?
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Feb 22, 2023, at 2:11 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> BTW there is a ticket from Apache Causeway team requesting to extract
> WicketTester in its own
FYI, it was somehow related to the question (and workaround) I posted on
Stackoverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72814759/running-junit-tests-ignoring-module-path/
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:12 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> BTW there is a ticket from Apache Causeway team requesting to
BTW there is a ticket from Apache Causeway team requesting to extract
WicketTester in its own Maven module because currently it causes problems
when trying to use wicket-core as a Java module.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7019
But maybe it could be done for M2
On Thu, Feb 9,
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, 18:03 Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Excuse my silly question but isn't ok for milestone version to depend on a
> snapshot version (fileupload 2.0-SNAPSHOT)?
>
Unfortunately not :(
The build will not be reproducible
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at
Excuse my silly question but isn't ok for milestone version to depend on a
snapshot version (fileupload 2.0-SNAPSHOT)?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:36 AM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 08:32 schreef Martin Grigorov :
>
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij <
>
Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 08:32 schreef Martin Grigorov :
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij
> wrote:
>
> > Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov >:
> >
> > > Please update
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0
> > > that
omponent-queuing mean?
>
> Best,
>
> KB
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> > Von: "Martin Grigorov"
> > An: "dev"
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2023 07:45:50
> > Betreff: Re: Time for Wicket M1?
>
> > Please update
>
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov :
>
> > Please update
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0
> > that the Component Queueing is gone
> >
> > Before releasing M1 I think we need
this remove of component-queuing mean?
Best,
KB
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Martin Grigorov"
> An: "dev"
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2023 07:45:50
> Betreff: Re: Time for Wicket M1?
> Please update
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d
Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov :
> Please update
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0
> that the Component Queueing is gone
>
> Before releasing M1 I think we need to:
> 1) update all dependencies to their latest stable version
> 2)
Please update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0
that the Component Queueing is gone
Before releasing M1 I think we need to:
1) update all dependencies to their latest stable version
2) copy over commons-fileupload2 classes to wicket-util or a new Maven
Hi Sven!
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:30 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> I've removed queuing on branch
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
> Still ready to be merged.
>
> We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we?
>
Yes! Many many thanks for your work. I remember someone
+1 :)
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, 05:41 Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 8:31 PM Sven Meier wrote:
>
> > I've removed queuing on branch
> > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
> > Still ready to be merged.
> >
> > We agreed to remove it
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 8:31 PM Sven Meier wrote:
> I've removed queuing on branch
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
> Still ready to be merged.
>
> We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we?
>
the hell "yes" :-)
Sven
>
>
> On 08.02.23 12:54, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
I've removed queuing on branch
https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
Still ready to be merged.
We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we?
Sven
On 08.02.23 12:54, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing...
Afaik the only blocker for m1 is fileupload2 ...
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 18:55 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing... No
> idea if that landed on the master branch?
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at
No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing... No
idea if that landed on the master branch?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:03 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that lately there have been some activities and questions related
> to Wicket 10. Although we have some
Hi,
I've seen that lately there have been some activities and questions related
to Wicket 10. Although we have some pending issues before proposing a
release candidate, I think it's the right time for a first milestone
release. What do you think?
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
19 matches
Mail list logo
