On 8/26/07, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice the web.xml uses the servlet and not filter approach - which is the
'preferred' option these days? Any reason to use one over the other? And
if not - maybe mention the filter in the talk and why you might want that.
The filter is
On 8/26/07, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice the web.xml uses the servlet and not filter approach - which is
the
'preferred' option these days? Any reason to use one over the other? And
if not - maybe mention the filter in the talk and why you might want that.
No reason,
I incorporated the patch of Al into the release branch, and built it
again. The feedback messages problem still persists, and wasn't fixed
with Al's effort (not that it targetted such a thing).
Martijn
On 8/22/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please backport the
I have uploaded a new version (the third) of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3
release to my
people.apache.org account. Updates are:
Release 3 (current):
- incorporated modification watcher fix
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=568603)
Release 2:
- updated copyright info in the notice.txt
Holy crap, this is actually a very serious problem! I missed it in the
former messages somehow. But I just tested form input, and the problem
even seems to persist across sessions! So the first message that is
loaded for a key wins, whatever session/ locale. This means that
localization is utterly
On 8/26/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded a new version (the third) of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3
release to my
people.apache.org account. Updates are:
Sorry that I'm the bad guy this time, but the message bundle problem
(and probably the same goes for all resource
On 8/26/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/26/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded a new version (the third) of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3
release to my
people.apache.org account. Updates are:
Sorry that I'm the bad guy this time, but the message bundle
