I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with
portlets. As I see it there are two options:
1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay the final 1.3 release until the
dust has settled.
2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.
WDYT?
Frank
On 9/19/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL
Gwyn Evans wrote:
On Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 12:12:16 AM, Ate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since -beta3, there have been several other commits to the trunk
which also affect critical areas like url handling: should those not have been
applied either?
Probably not! :-)
The amount of
Yes, it's about time, I think...
...Done.
/Gwyn
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 10:28:05 AM, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with portlets. As I see it there are two options:
1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 11:09:04 AM, Gwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero) chance of delaying 1.3 a bit.
/Gwyn
Gwyn Evans wrote:
We should have a vote on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-983
(Merge the portlet support branch into the trunk)
to decide whether we want this in core now or later.
Choices:
[X] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero) chance of delaying
I'm going to need this, so here's my non-binding vote for what it's worth
[X] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero) chance of delaying 1.3 a bit.
Frank Bille wrote:
I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with
portlets. As I see it there are two options:
1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay the final 1.3 release until the
dust has settled.
2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.
WDYT?
+1 from me, but I'm not
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I would feel more confident in the outcome when Al has had his looksy
on sunday. Shall we at least extend the vote until then?
Fine by me, +1
Ate
Typical votes
run for 72 hours, so it wouldn't delay too much if we extend it until
sunday evening or so. If Al hasn't
On 9/20/07, Ate Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Bille wrote:
I think we should wrap this up and hold a vote on how to proceed with
portlets. As I see it there are two options:
1) Merge portlets into trunk now and delay the final 1.3 release until
the
dust has settled.
2) Delay
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 11:28:02 AM, Martijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would feel more confident in the outcome when Al has had his looksy
on sunday. Shall we at least extend the vote until then? Typical votes
run for 72 hours, so it wouldn't delay too much if we extend it until
Gwyn Evans wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 11:28:02 AM, Martijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would feel more confident in the outcome when Al has had his looksy
on sunday. Shall we at least extend the vote until then? Typical votes
run for 72 hours, so it wouldn't delay too much if we
I just came across this in WicketFilter:
BufferedHttpServletResponse bufferedResponse = null;
String queryString = servletRequest.getQueryString();
if (!Strings.isEmpty(queryString))
{
bufferedResponse = webApplication.popBufferedResponse(sessionId,
On 9/9/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commit details look to be as follow (not that the URL works,) but I
don't see any mention of it on the mailing lists...
Revision: 600
http://svn.sourceforge.net/jwebunit/?rev=600view=rev
Author: henryju
Date: 2006-11-07 02:22:35 -0800 (Tue, 07
I appreciate the effort but we are very much better off if we could
include the generated dependencies reports of maven. This readme
document will get stale and out of date. And when building a release
you really don't have the time to parse and verify the readme document
for libraries.
maven
On 9/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate the effort but we are very much better off if we could
include the generated dependencies reports of maven. This readme
document will get stale and out of date. And when building a release
you really don't have the time to
BTW, I'm continuing to run the full javadoc build in ~tobrien as an interim
solution. It certainly isn't ideal, but it's one way to solve the
problem. :-) I'll keep an eye on the discussion.
On 9/10/07, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
issue filed:
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 11:13:23 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I'm continuing to run the full javadoc build in ~tobrien as an interim
solution. It certainly isn't ideal, but it's one way to solve the
problem. I'll keep an eye on the discussion.
Please flag it (to
17 matches
Mail list logo
