seems this is confusing a lot of users and it doesnt work the greatest, so
here is a vote
so the vote is to deprecate the constructor variants that do not take a
markup provider as an arg.
-igor
On 8/29/07, Oli Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just lost a few hours on a problem where an ajax
+1
-igor
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems this is confusing a lot of users and it doesnt work the greatest, so
here is a vote
so the vote is to deprecate the constructor variants that do not take a
markup provider as an arg.
-igor
On 8/29/07, Oli Evans [EMAIL
+1
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-igor
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems this is confusing a lot of users and it doesnt work the greatest,
so
here is a vote
so the vote is to deprecate the constructor variants that do not take a
...that would have to be a +1 from me too.
Matej Knopp wrote:
+1
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-igor
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems this is confusing a lot of users and it doesnt work the greatest,
so
here is a vote
On 8/29/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems this is confusing a lot of users and it doesnt work the greatest, so
here is a vote
so the vote is to deprecate the constructor variants that do not take a
markup provider as an arg.
+1. Had plenty of problem with it myself.
Eelco
