Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Hans,
I figured out where spurious loading of lm-ec and lm-texnansi in XeTeX
comes from.
One is comming from symb-glm.tex. But, when looking at it, it seems to
me that it's not even needed any more, since \leftguillemot,
\rightguillemot, \guilsingleleft and
Hello Hans,
I figured out where spurious loading of lm-ec and lm-texnansi in XeTeX
comes from.
One is comming from symb-glm.tex. But, when looking at it, it seems to
me that it's not even needed any more, since \leftguillemot,
\rightguillemot, \guilsingleleft and \guilsingleright are defined in
