Re: [dev-context] Is this font changing allowed/correct?

2009-06-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 14.06.2009 um 10:38 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Hans Hagen wrote: Some text. { \switchtobodyfont[concrete] More text. } concrete roman? mkiv does not support bitmap fonts out of the box Well, mkiv does indeed define a typescript for concrete in type- otf It doesn't, concrete is

Re: [dev-context] Is this font changing allowed/correct?

2009-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.06.2009 um 10:38 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Hans Hagen wrote: Some text. { \switchtobodyfont[concrete] More text. } concrete roman? mkiv does not support bitmap fonts out of the box Well, mkiv does indeed define a typescript for concrete in type-otf

Re: [dev-context] Is this font changing allowed/correct?

2009-06-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 14.06.2009 um 10:45 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.06.2009 um 10:38 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Well, mkiv does indeed define a typescript for concrete in type- otf It doesn't, concrete is not part of type-otf.mkiv, only type-otf.mkii In current? Beta

Re: [dev-context] Is this font changing allowed/correct?

2009-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.06.2009 um 10:45 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.06.2009 um 10:38 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Well, mkiv does indeed define a typescript for concrete in type-otf It doesn't, concrete is not part of type-otf.mkiv, only type-otf.mkii

Re: [dev-context] Is this font changing allowed/correct?

2009-06-14 Thread Patrick Gundlach
only. (btw, it is getting time for a new current, I think). Yes, please. That way I can test the repository :) Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl